Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Body mass index and bone loss among postmenopausal women: the 10-year follow-up of the OSTPRE cohort

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Obesity protects against osteoporosis, but the magnitude of this association has been difficult to assess from cross-sectional or short term studies. We examined the time course of bone loss as a function of body mass index (BMI) in early and late postmenopausal women. Our study population (n = 300) was a random sample of the population-based Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention (OSTPRE) Study, Finland. We excluded women without complete BMD results, premenopausal women during the second bone densitometry and women who had used hormone replacement therapy, bisphosphonates or calcitonin. BMI along with femoral neck and spinal bone mineral density (BMD) were assessed three times by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during a mean follow-up of 10.5 years (SD 0.5). The mean baseline age was 53.6 years (SD 2.8), time since menopause 2.9 years (SD 4.3) and BMI 27.3 kg/m2 (SD 4.4). The data was analyzed by linear mixed models. Thus, we were able to approximate the bone loss up to 20 postmenopausal years. To illustrate, a woman with a baseline BMI of 20 kg/m2 became osteopenic 2 (spine) and 4 (femoral neck) years after menopause, while obesity (BMI of 30 kg/m2) delayed the incidence of osteopenia by 5 (spine) and 9 (femoral neck) years, respectively. The delay was due to high baseline BMD of the obese, while bone loss rate was similar for both lean and obese subjects. This lean versus obese difference may also be partly due to altered X-ray attenuation due to fat mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kroger H, Tuppurainen M, Honkanen R, Alhava E, Saarikoski S (1994) Bone mineral density and risk factors for osteoporosis—a population-based study of 1600 perimenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen TV, Kelly PJ, Sambrook PN, Gilbert C, Pocock NA, Eisman JA (1994) Lifestyle factors and bone density in the elderly: implications for osteoporosis prevention. J Bone Miner Res 9:1339–1346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hannan MT, Felson DT, Dawson-Hughes B, Tucker KL, Cupples LA, Wilson PW, Kiel DP (2000) Risk factors for longitudinal bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 4:710–720

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dargent-Molina P, Poitiers F, Breart G, Group EPIDOS (2000) In elderly women weight is the best predictor of a very low bone mineral density: evidence from the EPIDOS study. Osteoporos Int 10:881–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sirola J, Kroger H, Honkanen R, Jurvelin JS, Sandini L, Tuppurainen MT, Saarikoski S, OSTPRE Study Group (2003) Factors affecting bone loss around menopause in women without HRT: a prospective study. Maturitas 3:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sirola J, Kroger H, Honkanen R, Sandini L, Tuppurainen M, Jurvelin JS, Saarikoski S (2003) Risk factors associated with peri- and postmenopausal bone loss: does HRT prevent weight loss-related bone loss? Osteoporos Int 1:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blain H, Carriere I, Favier F, Jeandel C, Papoz L, EPIDOS Study Group (2004) Body weight change since menopause and percentage body fat mass are predictors of subsequent bone mineral density change of the proximal femur in women aged 75 years and older: results of a 5 year prospective study. Calcif Tissue Int 1:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Macdonald HM, New SA, Campbell MK, Reid DM (2005) Influence of weight and weight change on bone loss in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal Scottish women. Osteoporos Int 2:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Douchi T, Kosha S, Uto H, Oki T, Nakae M, Yoshimitsu N, Nagata Y (2003) Precedence of bone loss over changes in body composition and body fat distribution within a few years after menopause. Maturitas 2:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ensrud KE, Cauley J, Lipschutz R, Cummings SR (1997) Weight change and fractures in older women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 8:857–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnell O, O’Neill T, Felsenberg D, Kanis J, Cooper C, Silman AJ (1997) Anthropometric measurements and vertebral deformities. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) Group. Am J Epidemiol 4:287–293

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blake GM, Fogelman I (2001) Monitoring treatment for osteoporosis by using bone densitometry. Semin Nucl Med 3:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wardlaw GM (1996) Putting body weight and osteoporosis into perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 63(3 Suppl):433S–436S

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reid IR (2002) Relationships among body mass, its components, and bone. Bone 5:547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reid IR, Comish J (2004) Direct actions of leptin on bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 4:313–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Svendsen OL, Hassager C, Skodt V, Christiansen C (1995) Impact of soft tissue on in vivo accuracy of bone mineral measurements in the spine, hip, and forearm: a human cadaver study. J Bone Miner Res 6:868–873

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tuppurainen M, Honkanen R, Kroger H, Saarikoski S, Alhava E (1993) Osteoporosis risk factors, gynaecological history and fractures in perimenopausal women—the results of the baseline postal enquiry of the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study. Maturitas 2:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kroger H, Heikkinen J, Laitinen K, Kotaniemi A (1992) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal women: a cross-sectional study of 717 Finnish volunteers. Osteoporos Int 3:135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saarelainen J, Honkanen R, Vanninen E, Kroger H, Tuppurainen M, Niskanen L, Jurvelin JS (2005) Cross-calibration of Lunar DPX-IQ and DPX dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral measurements in women: effect of body anthropometry. J Clin Densitom 3:320–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown HK, Prescott RJ (1999) Applied mixed models in medicine. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seidell JC, Flegal KM (1997) Assessing obesity: classification and epidemiology. Br Med Bull 2:238–252

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davies KM, Heaney RP, Recker RR, Barger-Lux MJ, Lappe JM (2001) Hormones, weight change and menopause. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 6:874–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaptoge S, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D, Lunt M, O’Neill TW, Silman AJ, Reeve J, EPOS Study Group (2004) When should the doctor order a spine X-ray? Identifying vertebral fractures for osteoporosis care: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 12:1982–1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu YZ, Liu YJ, Recker RR, Deng HW (2003) Molecular studies of identification of genes for osteoporosis: the 2002 update. J Endocrinol 2:147–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravn P, Cizza G, Bjarnason NH, Thompson D, Daley M, Wasnich RD, McClung M, Hosking D, Yates AJ, Christiansen C (1999) Low body mass index is an important risk factor for low bone mass and increased bone loss in early postmenopausal women. Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort (EPIC) study group. J Bone Miner Res 9:1622–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bainbridge KE, Sowers M, Lin X, Harlow SD (2004) Risk factors for low bone mineral density and the 6-year rate of bone loss among premenopausal and perimenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 6:439–446

    Google Scholar 

  27. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Seeman E, Offord KP, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Johnson KA, Melton LJ 3rd (1982) Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. J Clin Invest 4:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Greenspan SL, Maitland LA, Myers ER, Krasnow MB, Kido TH (1994) Femoral bone loss progresses with age: a longitudinal study in women over age 65. J Bone Miner Res 12:1959–1965

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liao EY, Wu XP, Luo XH, Zhang H, Dai RC, Huang G, Wang WB (2003) Establishment and evaluation of bone mineral density reference databases appropriate for diagnosis and evaluation of osteoporosis in Chinese women. J Bone Miner Metab 3:184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu W, Gluer CC, Fuerst T, Grampp S, Li J, Lu Y, Genant HK (1995) Influence of degenerative joint disease on spinal bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 3:169–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu W, Gluer CC, Grampp S, Jergas M, Fuerst T, Wu CY, Lu Y, Fan B, Genant HK (1995) Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 6:433–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bolotin HH, Sievanen H, Grashuis JL (2003) Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions. J Bone Miner Res 6:1020–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Patel R, Blake GM, Rymer J, Fogelman I (2000) Long-term precision of DXA scanning assessed over seven years in forty postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 1:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kolta S, Ravaud P, Fechtenbaum J, Dougados M, Roux C (1999) Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom. Osteoporos Int 1:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hannan MT, Tucker KL, Dawson-Hughes B, Cupples LA, Felson DT, Kiel DP (2000) Effect of dietary protein on bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 12:2504–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Loan MD, Johnson HL, Barbieri TF (1998) Effect of weight loss on bone mineral content and bone mineral density in obese women. Am J Clin Nutr 4:734–738

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fogelholm GM, Sievanen HT, Kukkonen-Harjula TK, Pasanen ME (2001) Bone mineral density during reduction, maintenance and regain of body weight in premenopausal, obese women. Osteoporos Int 3:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from Academy of Finland grant No.: 203403, TULES graduate school and Kuopio University Hospital (KUH). A special thanks to Mrs Eila Koski for performing the DXA measurements. We would also like to thank Ms Seija Oinonen for technical help and David Laaksonen for language check.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jarmo Saarelainen.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Equations for estimating postmenopausal (0–20 years) and age-related (50–70 years) change in bone mineral measurement values (n = 300) as a function of body mass index (BMI). Bone mineral measurements and all anthropometrical parameters were measured three times during a mean follow-up of 10.5 years. Statistical method: mixed models framework in the form of random coefficients regression (see Materials and methods for details). Equations for estimating age-related and postmenopausal changes in weight and height are also shown. All factors in the models were statistically significant (p < 0.05). BMD (g/cm2) i.e., bone mineral density.

Equations according to time since menopause (TSM, years):

$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{Lumbar spine BMD}} = - 0.0131 \times {\text{TSM}} + 0.0005 \, \times {\text{TSM}}^{2} + 0.0037 \times {\text{BMI}} + 1.0421 \hfill \\ {\text{Femoral neck BMD}} = - 0.0079 \times {\text{TSM}} + 0.0069 \times {\text{BMI}} + 0.7616 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{Lumbar spine T-score}} = - 0.1061 \times {\text{TSM}} + 0.0040 \times {\text{TSM}}^{2} + 0.0298 \times {\text{BMI}} - 1.3566 \hfill \\ {\text{Femoral neck T-score}} = - 0.0559 \times {\text{TSM}} + 0.0492 \times {\text{BMI}} - 1.7547 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{Weight}} = 0.4624 \times {\text{TSM}} - 0.0078 \times {\text{TSM}}^{2} + 69.8924 \hfill \\ {\text{Height}} = - 0.1241 \times {\text{TSM}} + 161.3485 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$

Equations according to calendar age (years):

$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{Lumbar spine BMD}} = - 0.0812 \times {\text{age}} + 0.0006 \times {\text{age}}^{2} + 0.0047 \times {\text{BMI}} + 3.4827 \hfill \\ {\text{Femoral neck BMD}} = - 0.0269 \times {\text{age}} + 0.0002 \times {\text{age}}^{2} + 0.0072 \times {\text{BMI}} + 1.7157 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{Lumbar spine T-score}} = - 0.6604 \times {\text{age}} + 0.0052 \times {\text{age}}^{2} + 0.0383 \times {\text{BMI}} + 18.4853 \hfill \\ {\text{Femoral neck T-score}} = - 0.1893 \times {\text{age}} + 0.0011 \times {\text{age}}^{2} + 0.0506 \times {\text{BMI}} + 4.9768 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} .$$
$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{Weight}} = 2.0041 \times {\text{age}} - 0.0142 \times {\text{age}}^{2} + 4.3970 \hfill \\ {\text{Height}} = - 0.1246 \times {\text{age}} + 167.6488. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$

About this article

Cite this article

Saarelainen, J., Kiviniemi, V., Kröger, H. et al. Body mass index and bone loss among postmenopausal women: the 10-year follow-up of the OSTPRE cohort. J Bone Miner Metab 30, 208–216 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-011-0305-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-011-0305-5

Keywords

Navigation