Skip to main content
Log in

Eel calcitonin (elcatonin) suppressed callus remodeling but did not interfere with fracture healing in the femoral fracture model of cynomolgus monkeys

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the effect of eel calcitonin (elcatonin) on the process of fracture repair in the osteotomized femur of cynomolgus monkeys, since they possess a Haversian remodeling system similar to that of humans. Alendronate was used for comparison. Twenty female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis), aged 18–22 years, were allocated into five groups: control (CNT, n = 4), low-dose elcatonin group (0.5 U/kg; ELL, n = 4), high-dose elcatonin group (5 U/kg; ELH, n = 4), low-dose alendronate group (10 μg/kg; ALL, n = 4) and high-dose alendronate group (100 μg/kg; ALH, n = 4). All animals were given subcutaneous injections twice a week for 3 weeks. Then fracture was produced surgically by transversely cutting the midshaft of the right femur and fixing with stainless steel plate. After fracture, treatments were continued until sacrifice at 26 weeks after surgery. The femora were assessed by micro CT, contact microradiograph, three-point bending mechanical test and histomorphometry. Micro CT showed that callus sizes in elcatonin-treated groups were similar to CNT, whereas alendronate-treated groups had larger calluses than those in the CNT and elcatonin-treated groups. Fracture lines almost disappeared in the CNT and elcatonin-treated groups but remained clear in the alendronate-treated groups. Total area did not differ significantly between the elcatonin-treated groups and the CNT but was significantly greater in the ALH compared to the CNT and elcatonin-treated groups, due to increased callus area in the ALH group. Callus remodeling was less suppressed in the elcatonin-treated groups than in the alendronate-treated groups when compared with callus remodeling in the CNT. Although no significant differences in structural mechanical properties such as ultimate load, stiffness and work to failure were found among all groups, ultimate stress was significantly reduced in the ALH group compared with CNT and ELL groups. In conclusion, mild suppression of callus remodeling by elcatonin did not impair overall fracture healing process. In contrast, alendronate delayed structural fracture healing process by strongly suppressing callus remodeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodan GA, Fleisch HA (1996) Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action. J Clin Invest 97:2692–2696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Russell RG, Rogers MJ (1999) Bisphosphonates: from the laboratory to the clinic and back again. Bone 25:97–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Delmas PD (2002) Different effects of antiresorptive therapies on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone 30:14–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Delmas PD (2002) Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet 359:2018–2026

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fleisch H (2001) Can bisphosphonates be given to patients with fractures? J Bone Miner Res 16:437–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodan GA, Martin TJ (2000) Therapeutic approaches to bone diseases. Science 289:1508–1514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujita T, Fujii Y, Miyauchi A, Takagi Y (1999) Comparison of antiresoptive activities of ipriflavone, an isoflavone derivative, and elcatonin, an eel carbocalcitonin. J Bone Miner Metab 17:289–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hori M, Takahashi H, Konno T, Inoue J, Haba T, Sakurada T, Noda T, Fujimoto K (1984) Effect of elcatonin on experimental osteoporosis induced by ovariectomy and low calcium diet in beagles. Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi 84:91–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshikawa S, Shiba M, Hoshino T, Igarashi M, Orimo H, Sakuma A, Tsuyama N (1983) Effect of eel calcitonin derivative(elcatonin) in osteoporosis. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 57:1717–1728

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sato M, Rippy MK, Bryant HU (1996) Raloxifene, tamoxifen, nafoxidine, or estrogen effects on reproductive and nonreproductive tissue in ovariecyomized rat. FASEB J 10:905–912

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chavassieux PM, Arlot ME, Reda C, Wei L, Yates AJ, Meunier PJ (1997) Histomorphometric assessment of the long-term effects of alendronate on bone quality and remodeling in patients with osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 100:1475–1480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Mori S, Kaji Y, Mashiba T, Kawanishi J, Norimatsu H (1999) Effect of bisphosphonate (incadronate) on fracture healing of long bones in rats. J Bone Miner Res 14:969–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li J, Mori S, Kaji Y, Kawanishi J, Akiyama T, Norimatsu H (2000) Concentration of bisphosphonate (incadronate) in callus area and its effects on fracture healing in rats. J Bone Miner Res 15:2042–2051

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li C, Mori S, Li J, Kaji Y, Akiyama T, Kawanishi J, Norimatsu H (2001) Long-term effect of incadronate disodium (YM-175) on fracture healing of femoral shaft in growing rats. J Bone Miner Res 16:429–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao Y, Mori S, Mashiba T, Westmore MS, Ma L, Sato M, Akiyama T, Shi L, Komatsubara S, Miyamoto K, Norimatsu H (2002) Raloxifene, estrogen, and alendronate affect the processes of fracture repair differently in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res 17:2237–2246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cao Y, Mori S, Mashiba T, Kaji Y, Manabe T, Iwata K, Miyamoto Kensaku, Komatsubara S, Yamamoto T (2007) 1α-25-Dihydroxy-2β(3-hydroxypropoxy)vitamin D3 (ED-71) suppressed callus remodeling but did not interfere with fracture healing in rat femora. Bone 40:132–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chambers TJ, Moore A (1983) The sensitivity of isolated osteoclasts to morphological transformation by calcitonin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 57:819–824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knopp JA, Diner BM, Blitz M (2005) Calcitonin for treating acute pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Osteoporos Int 16:1281–1290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishida Y, Kawai S (2004) Comparative efficacy of hormone replacement therapy, etidronate calcitonin, alfacalcidol, and vitamin K in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Yamagata Osteoporosis Prevention Study. Am J Med 117:549–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujita T, Fujii Y, Goto B (1997) A three-year comparative trial in osteoporosis treatment: effect of combined alfacalcidol and elcatonin. J Bone Miner Metab 15:223–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Orimo H, Morii H, Inoue T (1996) Effect of elcatonin on involutional osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 14:73–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Aro HT, Wippermann BW, Hodgson SF, Chao EY (1990) Internal remodeling of periosteal new bone during fracture healing. J Orthop Res 8:238–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schenk RK, Hunziker EB (1994) Histologic and ultrastructural features of fracture healing. In: Brington CT, Friedlaender GE, Lane JM (eds) Bone regeneration and repair, 1st edn. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL, USA, pp 117–146

    Google Scholar 

  24. Einhorn TA (1998) The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop 355S:S7–S21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Frost HM (1998) The biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop 248:283–309

    Google Scholar 

  26. McKibbin B (1978) The biology of fracture healing in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60-B:150–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ikegame M, Ejiri S, Ozawa H (1994) Histochemical and autoradiographic studies on elcatonin internalization and intracellular movement in osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res 9:25–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Meschia M, Brincat M, Barbacini P (1993) A clinical trial on effects of a combination of elcatonin (carbo-calcitonin) and conjugated estrogens on vertebral bone mass in early postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 53:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nicholson GC, Moseley JM, Sexton PM, Mendelsohn FAO, Martin TJ (1986) Abundant calcitonin receptors in isolated rat osteoclasts. J Clin Invest 78:355–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Suda T, Takahashi N, Martin TJ (1992) Modulation of Osteoclast differentiation. Endocr Rev 13:66–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin HY, Harris TL, Flannery MS, Azuffo A, Kaji EH, Gorn A, Kolakowski LF Jr, Lodish HF, Goldring SR (1991) Expression cloning of an adenylate cyclase-coupled calcitonin receptor. Science 254:1022–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nancollas GH, Tang R, Phipps RJ, Henneman Z, Gulde S, Wu W, Mangood A, Russell RGG, Ebetino FH (2006) Novel insights into actions of bisphonates on bone: Differences in interactions with hydroxyapatite. Bone 38:617–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mika Kawada and Yoshiko Fukuda for histological preparation and Asahi Kasei Co. for kindly supplying the elcatonin.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflict of interest associated with this study and publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Mori.

About this article

Cite this article

Manabe, T., Mori, S., Mashiba, T. et al. Eel calcitonin (elcatonin) suppressed callus remodeling but did not interfere with fracture healing in the femoral fracture model of cynomolgus monkeys. J Bone Miner Metab 27, 295–302 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-009-0046-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-009-0046-x

Keywords

Navigation