Abstract
To precisely capture the cavitation process, it is essential to establish physical and mathematical models that describes the thermodynamic process between liquid and vapor. However, most mass transfer models represented by the cavitation model involves numbers of empirical constants which are case specific. The calibration for the cavitation model constants is therefore required for accurate numerical simulations. In this paper, a rapid and effective calibration approach for model coefficients using a surrogate-based approximate optimization (SAO) strategy is established based on OpenFOAM platform. Coefficients calibration has been carried out for the Kunz cavitation model using both two-dimensional and three-dimensional hydrofoil experimental data. The selection law for the Kunz model constants which defines a specific region that would guarantee low levels of errors is obtained, implying the mass transfer mechanism between gas and liquid. Furthermore, the optimized values for the model constants are gained. Validations have been carried out using the cases of the three-dimensional hemispherical head-form. Results show that the optimal constants perform much better in cavitation predictions. The proposed calibration method is validated for feasibility and efficiency for cavitation model constant calibration and can also be applied for the other models with various empirical constants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Franc JP, Michel JM (2005) Fundamentals of cavitation. Fluid mechanics and its applications. Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2233-6
Ahn BK, Lee CS, Kim HT (2010) Experimental and numerical studies on super-cavitating flow of axisymmetric cavitators. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 2(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0018
Merkle CL, Feng J, Buelow PEO (1998) Computational modeling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on cavitation, pp 1–9
Kunz RF, Boger DA, Chyczewski TS, Stinebring DR, Gibeling HJ, Govindan TR (1999) Multi-phase CFD analysis of natural and ventilated cavitation about submerged bodies. FEDSM ‘99 1999 ASME/JSME joint fluids engineering conference, pp 1–9
Schnerr GH, Sauer J (2001) Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on multiphase flow, New Orleans, LA, USA
Singhal AK, Athavale MM, Li H, Jiang Y (2002) Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluids Eng 124(3):617–624
Zwart PJ, Gerber AG, Belamri T (2004) A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics. In: ICMF 2004 international conference on multiphase flow
Huang B, Wang GY (2011) A modified density based cavitation model for time dependent turbulent cavitating flow computations. Chin Sci Bull 56(19):1985–1992
Konstantinov SY, Tselischev DV, Tselischev VA (2015) Numerical cavitation model for simulation of mass flow stabilization effect in ANSYS CFX. Mod Appl Sci 9(4):21–31
Bensow RE, Bark G (2010) Simulating cavitating flows with les in openfoam. In: 5th European conference on computational fluid dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD (June), p 18
Meng G, Tan L, Cao S, Wang Y, Yun X, Wanshi Q (2014) Numerical prediction of performance drop due to cavitation in a centrifugal pump. In: 2014 ISFMFE—6th international symposium on fluid machinery and fluid engineering, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2014.1191
Roohi E, Zahiri AP, Pasandideh-Fard M (2012) Numerical simulation of cavitation around a two-dimensional hydrofoil using VOF method and les turbulence model. In: Proceedings of the eighth international symposium on cavitation (CAV 2012), pp 661–666
Roohi E, Zahiri AP, Passandideh-Fard M (2013) Numerical simulation of cavitation around a two-dimensional hydrofoil using VOF method and les turbulence model. Appl Math Model 37(9):6469–6488
Zhang Y, Luo XW, Ji B, Liu SH, Wu YL, Xu HY (2010) A thermodynamic cavitation model for cavitating flow simulation in a wide range of water temperatures. Chin Phys Lett 27(1):016401
Vaidyanathan R, Senocak I, Wu J, Shyy W (2003) Sensitivity evaluation of a transport-based turbulent. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 125:447–458
Goel T, Thakur S, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Zhao J (2008) Surrogate model-based strategy for cryogenic cavitation model validation and sensitivity evaluation. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 58(9):969–1007
Passandideh-Fard M, Roohi E (2008) Transient simulations of cavitating flows using a modified volume-of-fluid (VOF) technique. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 22(1–2):97–114
Tani N, ichi Tsuda S, Yamanishi N, Yoshida Y (2009) Development and validation of new cryogenic cavitation model for rocket turbopump inducer. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on cavitation (CAV2009), Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp 1–10
Morgut M, Nobile E, Biluš I (2011) Comparison of mass transfer models for the numerical prediction of sheet cavitation around a hydrofoil. Int J Multiph Flow 37(6):620–626
Liu HL, Wang J, Wang Y, Zhang H, Huang H (2014) Influence of the empirical coefficients of cavitation model on predicting cavitating flow in the centrifugal pump. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 6(1):119–131
Tseng CC, Wang LJ (2014) Investigations of empirical coefficients of cavitation and turbulence model through steady and unsteady turbulent cavitating flows. Comput Fluids 103:262–274
Pendar MR, Roohi E (2016) Investigation of cavitation around 3D hemispherical head-form body and conical cavitators using different turbulence and cavitation models. Ocean Eng 112:287–306
Roohi E, Pendar MR, Rahimi A (2016) Simulation of three-dimensional cavitation behind a disk using various turbulence and mass transfer models. Appl Math Model 40(1):542–564
Asnaghi A, Feymark A, Bensow RE (2017) Improvement of cavitation mass transfer modeling based on local flow properties. Int J Multiph Flow 93:142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.04.005
Kinzel M, Lindau J, Kunz R (2017) A unified homogenous multiphase CFD model for cavitation. In: American society of mechanical engineers, fluids engineering division (publication) FEDSM, vol 1B-2017
Hu F, Wu Z, Wang D, Zhang W (2017) Sequential approximate optimization method. Guofang Keji Daxue Xuebao J Natl Univ Def Technol 39(1):92–101
Bonte MHA, van den Boogaard AH, Huétink J (2008) An optimisation strategy for industrial metal forming processes. Struct Multidiscip Optim 35(6):571–586
Bonte MHA, Fourment L, Do TT, Boogaard AHVD, Huétink J (2010) Optimization of forging processes using finite element simulations: a comparison of sequential approximate optimization and other algorithms. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(5):797–810
Wang D, Hu F, Ma Z, Wu Z, Zhang W (2014) A CAD/CAE integrated framework for structural design optimization using sequential approximation optimization. Adv Eng Softw 76:56–68
Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE international conference on neural networks, Perth, Australia, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, vol 4, pp 1942–1948
Wu Z, Wang D, Hu F, Zhang W (2016) Surrogate based grain design optimization for solid rocket motor. J Solid Rocket Technol 39(03):321–326
Ebrahim K, Erfan K, Khodayar J, Seyyed MJ (2017) The investigation of natural super-cavitation flow behind three-dimensional cavitators: full cavitation model. Appl Math Model 45:165–178
Dimotakis PE, Gaebler HF, Hamaguchi HT (1987) Two dimensional NACA 66(MOD) hydrofoil high speed water tunnel tests. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA (Unpublished). http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20141113-160804180
Rouse H, Stephenson MJ (1948) Cavitation and pressure distribution: head forms at zero angle of yaw. State University of Iowa, Iowa City
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge support by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant nos. 51776221, 61872380) and foundation of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Computing of China (Grant no. 201803-01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, H., Xiang, M., Okolo, P.N. et al. An efficient calibration approach for cavitation model constants based on OpenFOAM platform. J Mar Sci Technol 24, 1043–1056 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0604-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0604-9