Skip to main content
Log in

Application of a special in-house validation procedure for environmental–analytical schemes including a comparison of functions for modelling the repeatability standard deviation

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For some years, a special in-house validation concept according to the Commission Decision 2002/657/EC of the European Union is employed. The validation concept is based on a variance component model, which allows to consider matrix- and operation-induced deviations and to calculate critical concentrations for given α-errors. The approach relies on a comprehensive mathematical model to asses simultaneously the in-house reproducibility and its components. One important component, the repeatability standard deviation, is estimated by means of a power function of the Horwitz-type. In this study, several performance characteristics were compared based on the use of four recommended estimations for the standard deviation depending on the concentration level of the analyte. A special factorial design for calibration, considering three factors influencing the variance of the measurement values, was applied for the determination of arsenic in surface water samples collected at several abandoned mining sites in Germany. The advantageous applicability of the validation method presented for analytical procedures referring to environmental tasks was demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Currie LA (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:1699–1723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. IUPAC Recommendations (1998) Guidelines for calibration in analytical chemistry:http://www.iupac.org

  3. EURACHEM Laboratory guide to method validation and related topics: The fitness for purpose of analytical methods, ed. 1.0 (1998)

  4. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG4, Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, Appendix E.4, 2 ed. (2000)

  5. IUPAC Technical Report (2002) Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis. Pure Appl Chem 74:835–855

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO 11843-2:2006-06, Capability of detection-Methodology in the linear calibration case, ISO Geneva

  7. DIN 32645:2008-11, Chemische Analytik-Nachweis-, Erfassungs- und Bestimmungsgrenze, Normenausschuss Materialprüfung im DIN

  8. Commission Decision 2002/657/EC, implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results

  9. Brüggemann L, Morgenstern P, Wennrich R (2010) Accred Qual Assur 15:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jülicher B, Gowik P, Uhlig S (1998) Analyst 123:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jülicher B, Gowik P, Uhlig S (1999) Analyst 124:537–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. InterVal, version 2.8 (2002) Program for In-house validation, quo data GmbH; http://www.quodata.de

  13. Brüggemann L, Quapp W, Wennrich R (2006) Accred Qual Assur 11:625–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Wennrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brüggemann, L., Wennrich, R. Application of a special in-house validation procedure for environmental–analytical schemes including a comparison of functions for modelling the repeatability standard deviation. Accred Qual Assur 16, 89–97 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0731-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0731-4

Keywords

Navigation