Abstract
For some years, a special in-house validation concept according to the Commission Decision 2002/657/EC of the European Union is employed. The validation concept is based on a variance component model, which allows to consider matrix- and operation-induced deviations and to calculate critical concentrations for given α-errors. The approach relies on a comprehensive mathematical model to asses simultaneously the in-house reproducibility and its components. One important component, the repeatability standard deviation, is estimated by means of a power function of the Horwitz-type. In this study, several performance characteristics were compared based on the use of four recommended estimations for the standard deviation depending on the concentration level of the analyte. A special factorial design for calibration, considering three factors influencing the variance of the measurement values, was applied for the determination of arsenic in surface water samples collected at several abandoned mining sites in Germany. The advantageous applicability of the validation method presented for analytical procedures referring to environmental tasks was demonstrated.
References
Currie LA (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:1699–1723
IUPAC Recommendations (1998) Guidelines for calibration in analytical chemistry:http://www.iupac.org
EURACHEM Laboratory guide to method validation and related topics: The fitness for purpose of analytical methods, ed. 1.0 (1998)
EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG4, Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, Appendix E.4, 2 ed. (2000)
IUPAC Technical Report (2002) Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis. Pure Appl Chem 74:835–855
ISO 11843-2:2006-06, Capability of detection-Methodology in the linear calibration case, ISO Geneva
DIN 32645:2008-11, Chemische Analytik-Nachweis-, Erfassungs- und Bestimmungsgrenze, Normenausschuss Materialprüfung im DIN
Commission Decision 2002/657/EC, implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results
Brüggemann L, Morgenstern P, Wennrich R (2010) Accred Qual Assur 15:99–104
Jülicher B, Gowik P, Uhlig S (1998) Analyst 123:173–179
Jülicher B, Gowik P, Uhlig S (1999) Analyst 124:537–545
InterVal, version 2.8 (2002) Program for In-house validation, quo data GmbH; http://www.quodata.de
Brüggemann L, Quapp W, Wennrich R (2006) Accred Qual Assur 11:625–631
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brüggemann, L., Wennrich, R. Application of a special in-house validation procedure for environmental–analytical schemes including a comparison of functions for modelling the repeatability standard deviation. Accred Qual Assur 16, 89–97 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0731-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0731-4