Skip to main content
Log in

An approach for more precise statements of metrological traceability on reference material certificates

  • Discussion Forum
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metrological traceability of measurement results is a key requirement for the comparability of such data in time and space and with legal or product specifications. Similarly, traceability of the certified values of a certified reference material (CRM) is a prerequisite for their usefulness. Consequently, a statement on metrological traceability of the certified value of the specified property is a requirement of the ISO Guide series on Reference Materials. The establishment of the traceability of a value assigned to a property of a reference material to a stated reference is pivotal to the use of the material. Metrological traceability is related to a combination of four attributes that are assigned to a clearly identified sample: description of the property, description of the quantity/kind of quantity, a number with its corresponding uncertainty and the measurement unit. The first two items define the identity of the measurand, whereas the latter two describe the value that is assigned to this measurand. Therefore, the concept of traceability rests on two anchor points, namely identity and quantity value. The identity of a measurand can be defined by its structure alone or by an operational/procedural definition, the quantity value of the measurand can refer to the SI, or to an artefact, if standards of arbitrary values have been used for the calibration of equipment (e.g. WHO standards; international units). The presented approach splits traceability statements for CRMs into a description of the identity of the measurand and the quantity value and provides a solution to overcome the conflict as to whether a measurement result should be declared as traceable to the SI or traceable to a method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO/IEC Guide 99 (2007) International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). ISO, Geneva

  2. ISO Guide 35 (2006) Reference materials—general and statistical principles for certification. ISO, Geneva

  3. ISO 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneva

  4. Eurachem, CITAC (2003) Traceability in chemical measurement

  5. Cox M (2007) Metrologia 44:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolff JC, Taylor PDP, De Bievre P (1996) Anal Chem 68:3231–3237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 17511 (2003) In vitro diagnostic medical devices—measurement of quantities in biological samples—metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and control materials. ISO, Geneva

  8. King B (2000) Accred Qual Assur 5:429–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guideline Q3A (2006) ICH, Geneva

  10. May W, Parris R, Beck C, Fassett J, Greenberg R, Guenther F, Kramer G, Wise S, Gills T, Colbert J, Gettings R, MacDonald B (2000) NIST special publication 260-136. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

  11. European Commission, DG Research (MT Program) (1994) Guidelines for the production and certification of BCR reference materials, 1st edn. Document BCR/48/93

  12. Pauwels J, Squirrell A (2000) Accred Qual Assur 5:2–67

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO Guide 34 (2009) General requirements for the competence of reference material producers. ISO, Geneva

  14. ILAC Guide 12 (2000) Guidelines for the requirements for the competence of reference materials producers. ILAC: www.ilac.org

  15. Traceability policy of ERM. http://www.erm-crm.org

  16. ISO Guide 31 (2000) Reference materials—contents of certificates and labels. ISO, Geneva

  17. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis (1990) Total dietary fibre in foods. In: Enzymatic—gravimetric method, 15th edn. 985.29, pp 1105–1106

  18. Englyst HN, Quigley ME, Hudson GJ (1994) Analyst 119:1497–1509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tyheander O, Åman P, Westerlund E, Andersson R, Pettersson D (1995) J AOAC Int 78:1030–1044

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee SC, Prosky L, De Vries JW (1992) J AOAC Int 75:395–416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. AACC Report (2001) Cereal Foods World 46:112–126

    Google Scholar 

  22. http://www.old.iupac.org/reports/provisional/abstract09/debievre_prs.pdf

  23. ISO 11446 (1995) Soil quality—extraction of trace elements soluble in aqua regia. ISO, Geneva

  24. Panteghini M (2007) Clin Biochem Rev 28:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  25. Horsti J, Uppa H, Vilpo JA (2005) Clin Chem 51:553–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. International Committee for Standardisation in Haematology (1985) ICSH/ICTH recommendations for reporting prothrombin time in oral anticoagulant control. Thromb Haemost 53:155–156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Ulrich Panne (BAM) and Steve Wood (LGC) and their co-workers are acknowledged for the fruitful discussions resulting in the new ERM traceability policy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Koeber.

Additional information

Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koeber, R., Linsinger, T.P.J. & Emons, H. An approach for more precise statements of metrological traceability on reference material certificates. Accred Qual Assur 15, 255–262 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0644-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0644-2

Keywords

Navigation