Skip to main content
Log in

Recovery revisited

  • Policies and Concepts
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last decade, various IUPAC documents have presented concepts related to the important ability of a measurement procedure to provide correct quantity values for amount, concentration, or content of a component in a system. The measurement procedure often, but not necessarily, includes one or more separation steps prior to the final instrumental reading. The vocabularies present concepts with some definitions and terms that disagree or are ambiguous, mostly revolving around the term ‘recovery’ and its derivatives. The present proposal consists in defining three concepts with the terms actual quantity, initially estimated quantity, and recovered quantity ratio, where ‘quantity ’ is used in the metrological sense of the international vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology, draft, 3rd edn. BIPM, Sèvres, 2005), not as a synonym of ‘amount’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Single quotation marks indicate terms or quotes whereas double quotation marks surround a concept.

  2. The sources quoted use subscript A as a reference to a component (analyte); here B is preferred in accordance with physicochemical terminology [5, 6]. Furthermore, the symbol Q is used throughout for a quantity in the metrological sense rather than c or x.

References

  1. Allen RE (ed) (1991) The concise Oxford dictionary of current English, 8th edn. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. The World Publishing Company (1969) Webster’s new twentieth century dictionary of the English language, 2nd edn. The World Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. IUPAC (1997) Compendium of chemical terminology: IUPAC recommendations (The Gold Book), 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (compiled by McNaught AD, Wilkinson A)

    Google Scholar 

  4. IUPAC (1993) Glossary for chemists of terms used in toxicology: IUPAC recommendations 1993. Pure Appl Chem 65:2003–2122 (prepared by Duffus JH)

    Google Scholar 

  5. IUPAC (1993) Quantities, units and symbols in physical chemistry (The Green Book), 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (prepared by Mills I, Cvitaš T, Honann K, Kallay N, Kuchitsu K)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO (1993) Quantities and units. ISO standards handbook, 3rd edn. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. IUPAC, Analytical Chemistry Division (1998) Compendium of analytical nomenclature: definitive rules 1997 (The Orange Book), 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (prepared by Inczédy J, Lengyel T, Ure AM)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IUPAC (1999) Harmonised guidelines for the use of recovery information in analytical measurement (technical report). Pure Appl Chem 71:337–348 (prepared by Thompson MS, Ellison R, Fajgelj A, Willetts P, Wood R)

    Google Scholar 

  9. IUPAC, Analytical Chemistry Division, Commission on General Aspects of Analytical Chemistry (2002) Use of the terms “recovery” and “apparent recovery” in analytical procedures: IUPAC recommendations 2002. Pure Appl Chem 74:2201–2205 (prepared by Burns DT, Danzer K, Townshend A)

    Google Scholar 

  10. IUPAC, Clinical Chemistry Division, Commission on Quantities and Units in Clinical Chemistry and IFCC Scientific Division, Committee on Quantities and Units (1995) Compendium of terminology and nomenclature of properties in clinical laboratory sciences: recommendations 1995 (The Silver Book). Blackwell, Oxford (prepared by Rigg JC, Brown SS, Dybkær R, Olesen H)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The theme of this paper was suggested by the members of the IUPAC Project 2001-010-3-500, Metrological traceability of measurement results in chemistry, whose chairman Paul De Bièvre is thanked for valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dybkaer, R. Recovery revisited. Accred Qual Assur 10, 302–303 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0922-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0922-6

Keywords

Navigation