Skip to main content
Log in

Including correlation effects in an improved spreadsheet calculation of combined standard uncertainties

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A spreadsheet method allowing rapid calculation of combined standard uncertainties is described. The model used allows explicitly for correlation effects, and requires a user to enter only the parameters, the calculation used to obtain the final result (including relevant influence factors), the individual standard uncertainties for the parameters, and estimates of correlation coefficients where necessary. The estimation of correlation coefficients in common cases is discussed, and it is shown that correlation is likely to be practically significant only when the correlated contribution to individual standard uncertainties is significantly over about 30% of the relevant standard uncertainty, leading to correlation coefficients |r| greater than 0.1. The implementation includes a more robust differentiation algorithm than previously reported for spreadsheet use, and initial preparation of the spreadsheets has been automated. The principle is illustrated with a simple example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that for many purposes it is convenient to choose c such that \( p(p',c) = p'\) and \( q(q',c) = q'\). This will normally follow where the common factor c arises from a nominally null correction, such as in the case of an assumption about which there is some uncertainty, or a calibration step with associated uncertainty.

References

  1. ISO (1993) “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”. Geneva, Switzerland. (ISBN 92-67-10188-9)

  2. Eurachem/CITAC Guide (2000) “Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement”, 2nd edition. Williams A, Ellison SLR, Roesslein M (eds). Available from the Eurachem secretariat and website (http://www.eurachem.com/) and (hard copy) LGC Ltd, London (ISBN 0-948926-15-5)

  3. Kragten J (1994) Analyst 119:2161–2166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haesselbarth W, Bremser W (2004) Accred Qual Assur 9:597–600

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vettering WT (1988) Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge NY, p 272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported under contract with the UK Department of Trade and Industry as part of the Valid Analytical Measurement (VAM) programme. The author thanks Mr A Williams for valuable discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen L. R. Ellison.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellison, S.L.R. Including correlation effects in an improved spreadsheet calculation of combined standard uncertainties. Accred Qual Assur 10, 338–343 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0008-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0008-5

Keywords

Navigation