Abstract
Six commercial programs devoted to the estimation of measurement uncertainty were compared for feasibility in order to be applied in routine chemical analysis. The main features of each program were discussed. They were applied to two well-documented case studies. Several screen captures were considered for illustration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taverniers I, van Bockstaele E, De Loose M (2004), Trends Anal Chem 23:480–490
Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993, corrected and reprinted in 1995
EURACHEM/CITAC Guide, (2000) Quantifyng Uncertainty in Analytical measurements, 2nd edn., http://www.vtt.fi/kct/eurachem/quam2000-pl.pdf
Herrador MA, González AG (2004) Talanta 64:415–422
Rasmussen SN, Software tools for the expression of uncertainty in measurement, MetroTrade Workshop on Traceability and Measurement Uncertainty in Testing. Berlin, 30–31 January 2003
Intramet, http://www.inframet.pl/uncertainty_calculators.htm
Metrodata GmbH, http://www.gum.dk, http://www.metrodata.de
Chemistry-software http://www.chemistry-software.com/quality/16032.htm
Decisioneering Inc., http://www.crystallball.com
Palisade, http://www.palisade-europe.com
Yang L, Willie S (2001) Uncertainty calculation in analytical chemistry. In: Chemical Metrology. INMS, NRCC
González AG, Herrador MA, Suero AG (2005) Accredit Qual Assur, in press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jurado, J.M., Alcázar, A. A software package comparison for uncertainty measurement estimation according to GUM. Accred Qual Assur 10, 373–381 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0005-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0005-8