Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measurement uncertainty and doping control in sport

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a series of alleged cases of doping in sport, the assessment of (non-) compliance with an established threshold value has been under debate. From several cases witnessed, it has been concluded that the work of some of the laboratories responsible for doping control does not comply with present quality requirements, most notably those of ISO/IEC 17025. In all cases studied, the observed value is just above the threshold, and a credible statement of measurement uncertainty is lacking. National accreditation bodies should pay specific attention to the latter issue, as the uncertainty statement is part of the material evidence of a (alleged) doping offence, and, as such, an important integral part of the accreditation status of a laboratory and its scope. The fight against doping is based on proper concepts and principles, but it has been noted that in some cases practice does not always follow the requirements set by the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See note 1 of clause 5.4.6.2 of [2]

  2. This is a concrete indication for the fact that between-laboratory effects significantly contribute to the measurement uncertainty, and therefore should be included (see e.g. ISO/IEC 17025 [2], ISO 5725–2 [11], EURACHEM/CITAC Guide [10]).

References

  1. 1 International Olympic Committee (IOC) Olympic movement anti-doping code. IOC, Lausanne, Switzerland

  2. ISO/IEC 17025 (1999) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland

  3. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) G8 (1996) Guidelines on the assessment and reporting of compliance with specification. ILAC:http://www.ilac.org/

  4. World Anti-Doping Agency WADA (2002) Laboratory accreditation requirements and operating standards, Version 1.0, 10 November 2002. WADA:http://www.wada-ama.org/

  5. IOC (2001) Olympic movement anti-doping code, Appendix A. Prohibited classes of substances and prohibited methods 2001–2002, 1 September 2001. Lausanne, Switzerland

  6. ILAC (2000) ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (Arrangement). ILAC:http://www.ilac.org/

  7. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (1993) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology, 2nd edn. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  8. De Bièvre P (1997) Accred Qual Assur 2:269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 1st edn. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  10. EURACHEM, CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn. EURACHEM:http://www.eurachem.ul.pt/

  11. ISO 5725–1 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—Part 1: General principles and definition, Statistical methods for quality control, vol. 2, pp 9–29

  12. ISO 5725–2 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method, Statistical methods for quality control, vol. 2, pp 30–74

  13. Williams A (1996) Accred Qual Assur 1:14–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellison SLR, Williams A (1998) Accred Qual Assur 3:6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellison SLR, Barwick VJ (1998) Analyst 123:1387–1392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barwick VJ, Ellison SLR (1999) Analyst 124:981–990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barwick VJ, Ellison SLR (2000) Accred Qual Assur 5:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barwick VJ, Ellison SLR (2000) Accred QualAssur 5:104–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. ILAC G15 (2002) Guidance for accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025. ILAC:http://www.ilac.org/

  20. ILAC G17 (2002) Introducing the concept of uncertainty of measurement in testing in association with the application of the standard ISO/IEC 17025. ILAC:http://www.ilac.org/

  21. EURACHEM (1998) Fitness for purpose of analytical methods—a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics, 1st edn., EURACHEM:http://www.eurachem.ul.pt/

  22. Galán Martín AM, Maynar Mariño JI, García de Tiedra MP, Rivero Marabé JJ, Caballero Loscos MJ, Maynar Mariño M(2001) J Chromatogr B 761:229–236

    Google Scholar 

  23. Haber E, Muñoz Guerra JA, Soriano C, Carreras D, Rodriguez C, Rodriguez FA (2001) J Chromatogr B 755:17–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dehennin L, Bonnaire Y, Plou P (1999) J Chromatogr B. 721:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  25. Horwitz W, Albert R (1997) Analyst 122:615–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. King B(1999) Accred Qual Assur 4:27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. De Bièvre P(1999) Accred Qual Assur 4:387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. European Commission (2002) Council Decision of 12 August 2002, implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and interpretation of results, 2002/657/EC, Official Journal of the European Communities, L221/8 EN, 17.08.2002.

  29. De Bièvre P (2001) Accred Qual Assur 6:289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ILAC G20 (2002) Guidelines on grading nonconformities. ILAC:http://www.ilac.org/

  31. ILAC (2001) ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (Arrangement): Policy statement. ILAC:http://www.ilac.org/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nederlands Meetinstituut, Schoemakerstraat 97, 2628 VK, Delft, The Netherlands

    Adriaan M. H. van der Veen

Authors
  1. Adriaan M. H. van der Veen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriaan M. H. van der Veen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Veen, A.M.H. Measurement uncertainty and doping control in sport. Accred Qual Assur 8, 334–339 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0644-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0644-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation