Abstract
Nuclear lamins are the main components of the nuclear lamina in many eukaryotes. They are members of the intermediate filament (IF) protein family. Lamins differ from cytoplasmic IF proteins by the presence of a nuclear localisation sequence (NLS) and a C-terminal tetrapeptide, the CaaX motif. The CaaX motif is target of post-translational modifications including isoprenylation, proteolytic processing, and carboxyl-methylation. These modifications, in conjunction with the NLS, direct lamins to the inner nuclear membrane where they assemble into filaments. Lamins lacking a CaaX motif are unable to associate independently with nuclear membranes and remain in the nucleoplasm. So far, three species have been reported to exclusively express CaaX-less lamins. All three belong to the lophotrochozoan lineage. To find out whether they represent rare exceptions, we analysed lamins of representatives of 17 lophotrochozoan phyla. Here we report that all four clades of Rotifera as well as individual taxa of Mollusca and Annelida lack CaaX-lamins, but express lamins with alternative C-termini. Of note, the respective mollusc and annelid groups occupy very different phylogenetic ranks. Most of these alternative C-termini are rich in aromatic residues. A possible function of these residues in membrane association is discussed. Alternative splicing of terebellid lamin transcripts gives rise to two lamin variants, one with a CaaX motif and one with an alternative C-terminus. A similar situation is found in Arenicolidae, Opheliidae, Capitellidae, and Echiura. This points a way, how the switch from lamins carrying a CaaX motif to lamins with alternative C-termini may have occurred.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The nuclear lamina is an integral part of the nuclear skeleton in eukaryotic cells. The lamina is made up of a network of filaments that are closely attached to the nuclear aspect of the inner nuclear membrane. Lamin proteins constitute the major components of the lamina. Together with lamina-associated polypeptides and lamin-binding proteins, they contribute to a wealth of cellular functions. The lamina is involved in nuclear mechanics and nuclear positioning, in the spatial organization of interphase chromatin and DNA replication, and it contributes to transcription and regulatory functions (Burke and Stewart 2013; Gruenbaum and Foisner 2015; Patil and Sengupta 2021). Mutations in lamin genes and their associated proteins cause a wide range of severe human hereditary diseases underscoring their relevance for the integrity of cellular functioning (Prokocimer et al. 2009; Wong and Stewart 2020).
Lamin proteins are members of the intermediate filament (IF) protein family (Peter et al. 1990). Most non-vertebrate genomes contain only a single lamin gene; exceptions are mosquitoes and fruit flies, which harbour two lamin genes. Vertebrates, on the other hand, possess three (mammals) or four (all other vertebrates) lamin genes (Peter and Stick 2012; Stick and Peter 2020).
All IF proteins are characterized by a tripartite domain organization. A short head domain and a larger tail domain flank a central α-helical domain, the rod domain. The rod domain forms an α-helical coiled-coil. In metazoans, it is subdivided into three α-helical subdomains, each of characteristic length and separated by short non-helical linkers (Herrmann and Aebi 2016). Conserved sequence motifs at both ends of the rod domain trigger coiled-coil formation and assembly into higher order filaments (Chernyatina et al. 2015; de Leeuw et al. 2018). The tail domains of lamins and of non-vertebrate cytoplasmic IFs contain a highly distinctive immunoglobulin-like fold, the lamin tail domain (LTD) (Dhe-Paganon et al. 2002). Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation at a cyclin-dependent kinase 1 recognition site within the lamin head domain causes disassembly and reassembly of the lamina during mitosis, respectively.
Lamins can be distinguished from cytoplasmic IF proteins by the presence of a nuclear localisation sequence (NLS) and by a CaaX isoprenylation motif at the C-terminus (Peter and Stick 2015). The CaaX tetrapeptide with the consensus (cysteine-aliphatic-aliphatic-methionine) is post-translationally isoprenylated at its cysteine residue, followed by endoproteolytic removal of the aaX residues, and subsequent carboxyl-methylation of the now terminal cysteine residue (Nigg et al. 1992). These modifications in conjunction with the NLS target lamins to the inner nuclear membrane where they form filaments (Loewinger and Mckeon 1988; Holtz et al. 1989). Ablation of the CaaX motif or mutation of the CaaX cysteine residue disables membrane association (McKeon 1991).
A few organisms express lamin proteins that lack a CaaX motif. Examples for CaaX-less lamins are the mammalian C lamins (Fisher et al. 1986), the C lamins of the Brachycera, a suborder of the dipterans (Bossie and Sanders 1993; Kollmar 2015), and the barley midge Mayetiola destructor, a dipteran belonging to the order Nematocera (Table 1) (Brandt 2015). Notably, in all these cases the CaaX-less lamin is co-expressed with at least one CaaX-containing lamin protein. This is interpreted in the way that CaaX-less lamins reach the nuclear membrane by co-transport with CaaX-lamins. Experimental settings in which co-expression of a CaaX-lamin is inhibited, demonstrate that CaaX-less proteins on their own are not able to associate with membranes, but remain in the nucleoplasm (Krohne et al. 1989). However, other mechanisms of membrane association are known for CaaX-less lamins, like the C2 lamins of mammals. C2 lamins are selectively expressed in male germ cells and acquire membrane affinity by myristoylation of a glycine residue at their N-terminus (Alsheimer et al. 2000).
Sequence analysis of an increasing number of phylogenetically very different organisms has shown that lamin proteins, originally characterized in metazoans also occur in other branches of the eukaryotic tree. Although sequence information is still incomplete, especially for unicellular eukaryotic taxa, it is assumed that a lamin gene was already present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) (Krüger et al. 2012; Kollmar 2015; Koreny and Field 2016). The search for lamins has also revealed that lamin proteins are missing in certain eukaryotic branches where their function is taken over by other proteins. Examples are the NMCP proteins in plants (Streptophyta), e.g. NMPCs of Daucus carota (Masuda et al. 1997; Ciska and de la Espina 2013), CROWDED NUCLEI (CRWN 1–4) of Arabidopsis thaliana (Wang et al. 2013), and the NUP-1 protein in trypanosomes, which are the main components of the lamina in these organisms (Rout and Field 2001). NMCPs and NUP-1 have analogous functions, but do not show phylogenetic relationship to lamins of the IF protein family (Koreny and Field 2016).
Extensive search for lamin sequences has unexpectedly revealed the existence of organisms that only possess CaaX-less lamins. Examples are the annelids Capitella teleta (Zimek and Weber 2011) and Helobdella robusta (Kollmar 2015) as well as the rotifer Adineta vaga (Kollmar 2015). All three species are members of the monophyletic group of Lochotrophozoans. The same has been reported for the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta, the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica, and one of the lamins of the rotifer Adineta vaga (Kollmar 2015). The lamins of Amphimedon queenslandica and one of the lamins of the rotifer Adineta vaga have been reported to additionally lack the LTD. (Kollmar 2015). An even more extensive loss of lamin sequence motifs was reported for species of two different crustacean orders, Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Eurytemora affinis. The latter were described to contain a conserved protein interaction domain, a PDZ domain, in their N-termini and to lack the entire C-terminus, which carries the LTD and the CaaX motif in other lamins (Kollmar 2015). None of these proteins carries other readily apparent recognition sites for lipidation, such as an N-terminal palmitoylation site. It therefore remains open how these proteins might associate with the inner nuclear membrane. To clarify whether these cases represent special biological cases or are merely due to missing sequence information or incorrect annotations we re-analysed these sequences and extended our search for CaaX-less lamins to more representatives of the lochotrophozoan lineage.
Materials and methods
Lamin sequences were retrieved from the NCBI databases (Agarwala et al. 2016) and the MolluscaBase (MolluscaBase 2020) by blast searches, using protein sequences of various lamins as query. Lophotrochozoan transcriptomes and proteomes were kindly provided by authors of the following publications: (Zverkov et al. 2019), (Ogura et al. 2013; Halanych and Kocot 2014; Struck et al. 2014; Lu et al. 2017; Laumer et al. 2019; Marlétaz et al. 2019; Stiller et al. 2020; Tilic et al. 2020, 2022; Mauer et al. 2021) and were searched by tblastn and blastp using lamin sequences of species from closely related taxa. Sequence alignments were done using MultAlin software (Corpet 1988). Protein statistics were done with The Sequence Manipulation Suite (Stothard 2000).
Results
Re-analysis of lamin sequences missing a CaaX motif
The loss of lamin-specific sequence motifs in only a single species within a systematic group, whose other members carry these motifs, raises questions of its biological significance. We therefore re-analysed the lamin sequences of the respective species, using information from publicly accessible databases. In some cases, we carried out de novo transcriptome assemblies using published RNA-Seq data.
For the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta, we have obtained the following: the genes encoding the two Salpingoeca lamins, lamin-1 and lamin-2, are arranged in tandem within the same genomic region. The upstream gene encodes the CaaX-less lamin-1 (PTSG_10006); the downstream gene contains a CaaX-encoding lamin (PTSG_10008); however, the last exon encoding the CaaX motif is located on a separate genomic contig (ACSY01003084) and therefore probably remained undiscovered so far (Table 1). The assignment of this exon to the S. rosetta lamin-2 gene is corroborated by transcript mapping, which shows that all exon/exon junctions, including that of the CaaX-encoding exon, are covered by RNA-Seq reads (Table 1). The CaaX-less lamin is transcribed, as shown by RNA-Seq data. In addition, we identified lamin transcripts for a further 10 choanoflagellate species by searching the iMicrobe database (Youens-Clark et al. 2019). All 10 species encode lamins carrying a CaaX motif. Taken together, this suggests that a gene duplication of the lamin gene has taken place in Salpigoeca rosetta and that one of the two lamins genes has lost the CaaX motif.
For the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica, we published previously a complete lamin sequence containing both an LTD and a CaaX motif (Peter and Stick 2012) (Table 1). The identical sequence is listed in the NCBI database as predicted Amphimedon lamin-L(I)-like, supported by 100% coverage of the annotated genomic features by RNA-Seq alignments (XM_011407353.2).
For Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Eurytemora affinis, transcripts encoding bona fide lamin proteins with an NLS, an LTD, and a CaaX motif were retrieved from the NCBI transcriptome database (Table 1). Sequences similar to those described by Kollmar (Kollmar 2015), which carry a PZD domain and coiled-coil domains but lack any further lamin features, can be found in many other crustaceans, but these genes do not belong to the lamin gene family.
CaaX-less lamins in the lophotrochozoan lineage
Three species remain, which have been reported to have lamin proteins, of which none carries a CaaX motif, Capitella teleta, Helobdella robusta, and Adineta vaga. All three belong to the clade Lophotrochozoa (Halanych et al. 1995; Kocot 2016; Marlétaz et al. 2019). Two Capitella lamin variants will be described in the section ‘CaaX-less lamins in the phylum Annelida’. Helobdella robusta expresses two lamins, both lack a CaaX motif, as consistently proven by transcriptomic and genomic sequences (Table 4). The lack of CaaX motifs in Adineta vaga lamins is reported in the section ‘Rotifera syn. Syndermata’.
Since the absence of a CaaX motif in the lamin proteins of two species could be proven beyond doubt, and since these species belong to the lophotrochozoan clade we next searched for lamin sequences in closely related species and then extended our search to the entire group of Lophotrochozoa.
Lophotrochozoa is one of the three major monophyletic groups of bilaterian animals (Halanych et al. 1995). The other two are the Ecdysozoa and the Deuterostomia. The Ecdysozoa are the sister group of the Lophotrochozoa. Together they constitute the monophyletic group Protostomia. (Fig. 1) (Halanych et al. 1995; Kocot 2016; Bleidorn 2019; Marlétaz et al. 2019). Ecdysozoa include the nematodes and arthropods, while the Deuterostomia include the hemichordates, echinoderms, and chordates. The clade Lophotrochozoa is home to 18 phyla with taxa as diverse as the segmented annelids, the shell-bearing molluscs and brachiopods, the colony-forming bryozoans and the endoparasitic Acanthocephala, to name but a few (Halanych et al. 1995; Kocot 2016). They include both species-rich groups and groups consisting of only a few species (Bánki et al. 2022).
We were able to determine lamin sequences of representatives from 17 of 18 lophotrochozoan phyla (Fig. 1), totalling more than 200 species (Supplementary Table S1). Our analysis reveals that CaaX-less lamins occur in at least six clades of different phylogenetic rank, namely within the Annelida, the Mollusca, and all four clades of the Rotifera (Fig. 1).
Rotifera syn. Syndermata
The phylum Rotifera includes the Monogonata, Bdelloidea, Seisonidea, and Acanthocephala (Fig. 1) (García-Varela and Nadler 2006; Struck et al. 2014; Wey-Fabrizius et al. 2014; Sielaff et al. 2016). Members of these four groups have very different lifestyles and different modes of reproduction. Most monogononts and bdelloids are free-living aquatic organisms. Monogononts have a heterogontic life cycle switching between parthenogenetic and bisexual reproduction (Gilbert 2020), while bdelloids reproduce exclusively parthenogenetically. They lack males and there exists no evidence of meiotic processes (Fontaneto et al. 2007). Acanthocephalans are obligate endoparasites with a life cycle switching between invertebrates as intermediate and vertebrates as final hosts. Seisonids, with only two species known so far, ectoparasitize on marine crustaceans of the genus Nebalia and reproduce strictly sexually (Mauer et al. 2021). Despite this great diversity, Rotifera form a monophyletic group. One of the synapomorphic characters is the presence of a syncytial epidermis, hence the synonym Syndermata.
Lamin sequences have been obtained for representatives of all four rotiferan clades, namely for eight bdelloids (Flot et al. 2013; Eyres et al. 2015), eight monogononts (Hanson et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2015; Gribble and Welch 2017; Kang et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2021), two acanthocephalans (Struck et al. 2014; Mauer et al. 2020), and for Seison nebaliae (Mauer et al. 2021) (Supplementary Table S1). None of these lamins carries a CaaX motif. Moreover, the C-terminal sequences differ markedly between individual rotiferan groups. The genome of bdelloid Adineta vaga is tetraploid; its structure is incompatible with conventional meiosis (Flot et al. 2013). The Adineta genome contains four lamin genes, reflecting its tetraploid state. Two of the four genes are almost identical to each other. Of note, all four lamins possess an LTD but all lack a CaaX motif (Table 2). We obtained transcriptomic and genomic sequence information for two additional Adineta species and five bdelloid species of other genera. C-termini of bdelloid lamins are characterized by a high proportion of aliphatic amino acid residues (40–50%), but lack aromatic residues (Table 2). C-termini of monogonont lamins, in contrast are rich in aromatic residues (phenylalanine and tryptophan) (Table 2). While the proportion of aromatic residues in total lamin proteins averages about 5%, up to four out of the last 10 residues (10–40%) are aromatic in monogonont lamins (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1). Moreover, with the exception of the Brachionus calyciflorus lamin, the C-termini are devoid of negatively charged residues. Pomphorhynchus laevis, an acanthocephalan, and the seisonid Seison nebaliae each express two very similar lamin proteins. In Seison, alternative splicing gives rise to a total of four protein variants, three of which differ in their C-termini. One of these variants carries the tetrapeptide sequence CSEE at its C-terminus. Despite the presence of the cysteine residue in an appropriate position, this sequence cannot serve as an isoprenylation substrate. This is because the farnesyltransferase cannot accommodate charged residues such as the glutamic acid residue in the X-position in its specificity pocket (Reid et al. 2004).
Mollusca with emphasis on Cephalopoda
The phylum Mollusca comprises eight classes, including very species rich classes with more than 10,000 species (Gastropoda, Bivalvia, and Cephalopoda), those with several hundred species (Polyplacophora, Scaphopoda, Solenogastres, Caudofoveata), and the Monoplacophora, for which only 32 species have been described to date (MolluscaBase (2020) (Fig. 2). The phylogenetic relationships among the eight clades have been largely clarified (Wanninger and Wollesen 2019; Kocot et al. 2020) (Fig. 2). Only the position of the Monoplacophora is still subject of debate. By morphological criteria they are considered a sister group to the rest of the Conchifera (Fig. 2), while phylogenomic analyses places them together with Cephalopoda (Kocot et al. 2020). Lamin sequences were obtained for representatives of all eight classes. But the number of species for which lamin sequences have been obtained varies greatly among the eight classes (Fig. 2). This depends, among other things, on the species richness of a group as well as on the sequencing depth, which in turn usually reflects the medical, economic or scientific importance of the respective group. The latter is especially the case when a species/clade holds a unique phylogenetic position.
Lamins with a CaaX motif were consistently found in all mollusc classes, with the notable exception of cephalopods (Fig. 2). In all 23 cephalopod species studied, only lamins lacking this motif were identified. These 23 species represent six orders, including Nautilus at the very base of the cephalopod phylogenetic tree (Uribe and Zardoya 2017). Of note, all cephalopod lamins possess a 10–12 amino-acid-residue-long highly conserved C-terminal sequence rich in aromatic residues with the sequence consensus: TPsQqkkgWlFW* (uppercase ≥ 90% identity, lowercase ≥ 50% identity) (Corpet 1988). We identified complete lamin genes for five cephalopod species for which whole genome assemblies of high quality were available, namely Nautilus pompilius (Ogura et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2021), of the two closely related species of the common Octopus complex (Gleadall 2016), i.e. Octopus sinensis (Li et al. 2020) and Octopus vulgaris (Zarrella et al. 2019), the gene of Octopus minor (Kim et al. 2018), and of Architeuthis dux (da Fonseca et al. 2020). We determined the exon–intron patterns for these five genes, three of which are shown (Fig. 3a, b, c). No transcript information is available for Architeuthis dux (da Fonseca et al. 2020). However, the gene structure could be deduced by using the transcript information of Sepioloida lineolata, for which four transcript variants are known (Fig. 3e). The coding region of the Nautilus lamin gene is made up of 12 exons separated by 11 introns (Fig. 3a). Eight of these introns correspond in position to archetypal lamin introns found in many metazoan lamin genes including non-bilaterians and bilaterians (Peter and Stick 2012) (labelled with Roman numerals I to VIII in Fig. 3). In contrast, the intron that separates exon 2 from exon 3 is restricted to the Protostomia lineage (Peter and Stick 2012). This pattern was also found in the other four cephalopod lamin genes.
Downstream of exon 10, cephalopod lamin genes differ from those of most other species. While in most other metazoans the CaaX motif is encoded in a single short exon, C-termini of the cephalopod lamins are encoded by two, three or four exons respectively (Fig. 3a, b, c). The C-terminal cephalopod consensus motif is encoded in two exons, with the last exon containing only the second and third nucleotide of the terminal tryptophan codon followed by a termination codon. This feature is consistently found in all cephalopod lamins analysed so far. For Nautilus pompilius, only one type of transcript has been found. In contrast, two transcript variants are present in most Octopodiformes (e.g. Hapalochlaena maculosa, Octopus kaurna, O. maya, O.vulgaris) and up to four in the Decapodiformes (e.g. Chiroteuthis calyx (3), Dosidicus gigas (3), Euprymna tasmanica (2), Octopoteuthis deletron (3), Onychoteuthis banksii (2), Pterygioteuthis hoylei (2), Sepia esculenta (2), Sepia pharaonis (2), Sepioloidea lineolata (4), Vampyroteuthis infernalis (3), Watasenia scintillans (3)). These variants result from alternative splicing of the additional one, respectively two exons, which are located between exon 10 and the two terminal exons (Fig. 3b, c, d, e). Whether with or without the regions encoded by the alternatively spliced exons, all cephalopod lamins terminate with the consensus sQqkkgWlFW (uppercase ≥ 90% identity, lowercase ≥ 50% identity) (Corpet 1988). The C-termini lack negatively charged residues with a few exceptions and are rich in the aromatic residues phenylalanine and tryptophan. Particularly noteworthy is the highly conserved position of two tryptophan residues at the very C-terminus from two points of view. Firstly, this amino acid is one of the rarest in proteins. Secondly, tryptophan has a special role in the interaction of proteins with membranes (Khemaissa et al. 2021).
CaaX-less lamins in the phylum Annelida
Annelida, commonly named as segmented worms, is a morphologically diverse phylum within the Lophotrochozoa. The phylum comprises over 16,000 species, which inhabit a wide range of marine, freshwater and terrestrial habitats and enjoy very different lifestyles. Most basic phylogenetic relationships within the annelids have been clarified in recent years with the help of extensive sequence and phylogenomic analyses (Fig. 4). There are two major clades, the Sedentaria and the Errantia, in addition to several basal groups (Struck et al. 2011, 2015; Weigert et al. 2014; Weigert and Bleidorn 2016). We were able to determine lamin sequences for the 18 clades listed in Fig. 4. Even though the number of lamin sequences obtained from the basal annelid groups is still small, the following picture emerges: Lamins with a C-terminus other than a CaaX motif are found in a subset of clades of the Sedentaria, namely the Clitellata, Terebelliformia, Arenicolidae, Opheliidae, Capitellidae, and Echiura (Fig. 4). The C-termini of all these lamins, similar to those of the cephalopods, lack negative amino acid residues with few exceptions and are rich in aromatic residues (Tables 2, 3, and 4). However, the number of aromatic residues varies between individual lamins (Table 4). This is especially true for the earthworms of the genera Lumbricus, Eisenia, and Glossoscolex, which express two or even three lamins, one of which usually has a particularly high proportion of aromatic residues, as well as for all Terebelliformia that were studied (Table 4).
Of particular interest are observations in the suborder Terebelliformia. We were able to obtain a wealth of lamin transcripts for terebelliformian species due to the availability of extensive transcriptome data originally generated for phylogenetic studies (Stiller et al. 2020). In the majority of the terebellids, we identified up to three transcript variants that differ in the last 10 to 32 triplets of their open reading frames, giving rise to lamin variants with different C-termini. One of the two variants carries a typical CaaX motif, the other a C-terminus, which is rich in aromatic and positively charged residues but lacks aliphatic and negatively charged residues (alternative C-termini). These C-termini meet the sequence consensus gRrSWFwWnK* (uppercase ≥ 90% identity, lowercase ≥ 50% identity) (Corpet 1988). Interestingly, the transcripts encoding the variants with the alternative C-termini contain the sequence information for the corresponding CaaX termini within their 3′-UTR. From this, even though genomic information is missing for Terebellids, the following can be deduced: in the lamin genes of the Terebelliformia, the exon encoding the alternative C-terminus is located upstream of the CaaX-encoding exon and is flanked on both sides by an intron (Fig. 5a). When the two flanking introns are spliced out, the transcript is generated, which encodes the lamin with the alternative C-terminus. The region encoding the CaaX-terminus remains in the 3′-UTR of this mRNA. If, on the other hand, the exon encoding the alternative C-terminus is spliced out together with the two flanking introns, the transcript encoding the CaaX variant is generated (Fig. 5a).
Arenicola is a member of the sister group of the Terebelliformia (Andrade et al. 2015; Helm et al. 2018). Only one transcript was found for Arenicola marina. It encodes a lamin with an alternative C-terminus (Table 4), but, like the lamin transcripts of the terebellids, it also contains sequence information for a putative CaaX-terminus in its 3′-UTR. To check whether there exists an mRNA encoding this CaaX variant, the position of the putative splice site was determined by alignment of the Arenicola lamin sequence with those of the terebellids. In this way, the nucleotide sequence of the splice junction could be reconstructed from the transcript and subsequently checked and verified by blast searches using Arenicola RNA-Seq reads.
Capitellidae and Echiura are in a sister group relationship to each other. Together with Opheliidae they form a monophyletic group within Sedentaria (Fig. 4). The lamin sequence of the capitellid Capitella teleta has previously been published (Zimek and Weber 2011). It was annotated with an alternative C-terminus. For Urechis unicictus, a member of Echiura, in contrast, a lamin with a CaaX terminus was found. Therefore, we paid special attention to the possible existence of two lamin variants within these three groups. Using the approach described above for Arenicola, we were able to detect both lamin variants, one with a C-terminal CaaX motif and one with an alternative C-terminus, for Capitella teleta and Urechis unicincta as well as for the opheliid, Thoracophila mucronata, respectively (Table 4, Supplementary Table S1). For Ophelina acuminata, a second member of the Opheliidae, we obtained partial RNA-Seq sequences encoding the corresponding C-terminal regions that closely resemble those of Thoracophila.
For Capitella, the gene structure could be clarified by comparing the genomic sequences with the sequences of the two transcript variants (Fig. 5b). These results support the splicing pattern for the Terebelliformia, which could only be inferred from the comparison of the two transcript variants.
All annelid species in which lamins with alternative C-termini have been found belong to clades that together form a monophyletic group, these groups are the above-discussed Clitellata, Terebelliformia, Arenicolidae, Capitellidae, and Echiura (Weigert et al. 2014; Struck et al. 2015; Weigert and Bleidorn 2016). So far, we have no evidence that any of the species of the Clitellata expresses a CaaX variant in addition to its lamins with alternative C-termini.
In all other annelid groups studied, we found lamins carrying a CaaX motif and so far have no evidence that these species also express lamins variants with alternative C-termini (Fig. 4). For representatives of the Errantia, in particular for the Sabellida, Phyllodocida and Eunicida, we had access to a comparably large amount of transcriptome data as for the Terebelliformia (Laumer et al. 2019; Stiller et al. 2020; Tilic et al. 2022) (Fig. 4). So, if they were present, we should have picked up lamin variants with alternative C-termini in these groups. Far less sequence data are available for the basal annelid groups. The detection of lamins in some of these taxa is currently based on only one or two species.
Discussion
The search for lamin proteins in the Lophotrochozoa lineage has revealed that lamins with an alternative C-terminus in place of a CaaX motif occur in several branches of this clade. The branches occupy widely different ranks within the phylogenetic tree of the Lophotrochozoa. Lamins with alternative C-termini were found in all four classes of the Rotifera. In molluscs they are restricted to one of the eight classes, the cephalopods, and within annelids they are present in some subgroups of the Sedentaria, but not in others. A reliable identification of lamins with alternative C-termini requires lamin transcripts with a full length ORF, and/or a sufficient number of RNA-Seq reads with which gene annotations can be verified. Since lamin transcripts are only moderately abundant, retrieving a transcript with a full length ORF requires high sequence coverage. Although the amount of sequence information is constantly growing due to intensive phylogenetic studies and due to new sequencing methods, sequence coverage of individual lophotrochozoan groups remains limited at present. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that lamins with alternative C-termini will be discovered in further lophotrochozoan subgroups as sequencing progresses.
It is assumed that a lamin with its characteristic features including the C-terminal CaaX isoprenylation motif was already present in the last eukaryotic ancestor and was subsequently lost in particular eukaryotic branches (Krüger et al. 2012; Kollmar 2015; Koreny and Field 2016). The most plausible assumption is therefore that lamins with alternative C-termini have evolved independently several times in the lophotrochozoan lineage.
The CaaX motif is a target for post-translational modifications, which, as experimentally proven, is necessary for the association of CaaX proteins with membranes (Clarke 1992). Ablation of the CaaX motif or mutation of the CaaX cysteine residue disables membrane association of lamins (McKeon 1991; Hennekes and Nigg 1994; Hofemeister et al. 2000). The lamins described here do not differ from the CaaX lamins in any other aspect apart from their alternative C-termini. It can also be assumed that these lamins do associate with the inner nuclear membrane and form a lamin filament network like the CaaX lamins. In this context, it is worth noting that a very prominent fibrous nuclear lamina was described as early as 1963 in neurons of the leech, Hirudo medicinalis (Gray and Guillery 1963) a species that possesses lamins with alternative C-termini (Table 4). It is therefore reasonable to assume that the alternative C-termini also have functional significance for membrane association.
The alternative lophotrochozoan C-termini can be grouped in two types. C-termini of bdelloid lamins are rich in aliphatic amino acid residues but lack aromatic residues. Most of the others, namely those of the other rotifers, the cephalopods, and the alternative C-termini of the annelids stand out for the absence of negatively charged residues and their high proportion of aromatic residues, in particular phenylalanine and tryptophan.
The nuclear matrix constituent proteins (NMCPs) are the structural components of the plant lamina. They are considered to be the analogs of lamins in plants (Ciska and de la Espina 2013). However, they are not members of the IF protein family but have other evolutionary roots. Type 1 NMCPs (NMCP1) possess highly conserved C-terminal sequences (Ciska et al. 2019). These are strikingly similar to the C-termini of many of the lophotrochozoan lamins discussed here (Tables 3 and 4). Even though the underlying molecular mechanisms are still unknown, the high sequence similarity makes a functional relationship seem more plausible than a purely coincidental sequence match. Tryptophan is the amino acid with the largest side chain with unique physicochemical properties. It is one of the rarest amino acids in proteins. In integral membrane proteins tryptophan is especially located at the level of the water/bilayer interface and plays a role in membrane protein stabilisation and anchoring (Khemaissa et al. 2021).
However, information on the role of tryptophan and phenylalanine residues in proteins other than integral membrane proteins is scarce. Experiments with the Rho guanine exchange factor TGAT may provide a clue, albeit an indirect one. It was shown that the 15-residue long C-terminus of TGAT, which contains one tryptophan, and four phenylalanine residues in addition to two cysteine residues, mediates association with the plasma membrane even in the absence of palmitoylation of the cysteine residues (van Unen et al. 2018). Therefore, it is suggestive that the tryptophan and phenylalanine residues in the lamin C-termini have a function in membrane association. However, this requires experimental proof, which cannot be provided by the authors within the framework of this work. It is hoped that colleagues who have the experimental facilities will take up this question.
Terebelliformia provide a glance at the playground of evolution
Results of subgroups within the Annelida, namely the Terebelliformia, Arenicolidae, Opheliidae, Capitellidae, and Echiura are of particular interest with respect to the evolution of lamins with alternative C-termini. They point a way to how the switch from lamins carrying a CaaX motif to lamins with alternative C-termini may have occurred. The following scenario can be imagined: In a first step a lamin gene acquired an additional exon encoding a novel C-terminus. Alternative splicing of the corresponding primary transcript produces two lamin mRNAs, which then give rise to two lamin protein variants, one carrying a CaaX motif, the other a new alternative C-terminus. The new C-terminus does not necessarily have to confer membrane association right from the beginning, as the corresponding lamin is co-expressed together with the CaaX lamin and will be targeted to the nuclear membrane by co-transport. Once the alternative C-terminus itself has acquired the property of mediating membrane association, the CaaX motif is dispensable and may be lost. The co-existence of two lamins, products of a single gene, one with an alternative C-terminus, one still carrying a CaaX motif at its C-terminus, is seen so far only in five clades of the Annelida, namely in the Terebelliformia, Arenicolidae, Opheliidae, in Capitella and in Urechis. The fact that mRNAs for both lamin variants could be detected in all cases suggests that both protein variants are indeed co-expressed. In contrast, the Clitellata as well as members of other Lophotrochozoa clades, the Rotifera and the Cephalopoda, have lost the information for a CaaX-carrying lamin. In these organisms, the association of lamins with the nuclear membrane must occur in a different way. A role of the new C-terminal sequences seems obvious, but must be clarified experimentally.
In other cases where lamins exist without a CaaX motif, they are expressed together with a second, constitutively expressed CaaX lamin and, as shown experimentally, are unable to associate with the nuclear membrane on their own (Krohne et al. 1989). In contrast to the cases described for the annelids, these lamins are encoded by separate genes. The first step in the evolution of these CaaX-less lamins was therefore probably a duplication of the lamin gene, followed by differentiation and loss of the CaaX motif.
The appearance of alternative lamin C-termini in clades of different phylogenetic position raises the question of whether they are the result of genetic drift and/or what evolutionary advantage the acquisition of these new C-termini might confer. However, discussion of these issues requires experimental studies that provide information about the nature and strength of the membrane affinity conferred by the alternative C-termini.
We focused our analysis on the lophotrochozoan lineage, as this group was the only one in which lamins with exclusively alternative C-termini were found so far. The number of lophotrochozoan species studied is limited by the sequence information currently available. For many taxa this number is small compared to the number of species for the respective group (Bánki et al. 2022). Moreover, whether lamins with alternative C-termini are actually absent in those groups where they have not been found, or have merely remained undiscovered, must remain open. The C-terminal sequences to be searched for are short and show variability. Negative results in database searches therefore cannot make any definitive statements about their absence. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that further examples of lamins with alternative C-termini will be found within the lochotrophozoan lineage. Likewise, it must remain open whether this is a peculiarity of the Lophotrochozoa. So far, no cases are known in other groups. However, since the occurrence within the Lophotrochozoa is restricted to individual systematic groups of different phylogenetic ranks, very extensive sequence data are needed to make reliable statements for other groups. The Earth BioGenome Project 2020, which aims to sequence all known eukaryotic species in a 10-year timeframe (Lewin et al. 2018), and in particular comprehensive transcriptome data will be able to provide answers here.
References
Agarwala R, Barrett T, Beck J, Benson DA, Bollin C, Bolton E, Bourexis D, Brister JR, Bryant SH, Lanese K, Charowhas C, Clark K, DiCuccio M, Dondoshansky I, Federhen S, Feolo M, Funk K, Geer LY, Gorelenkov V, Hoeppner M, Holmes B, Johnson M, Khotomlianski V, Kimchi A, Kimelman M, Kitts P, Klimke W, Krasnov S, Kuznetsov A, Landrum MJ, Landsman D, Lee JM, Lipman DJ, Lu ZY, Madden TL, Madcj T, Marchler-Bauer A, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Murphy T, Orris R, Ostell J, O’Sullivan C, Panchenko A, Phan L, Preuss D, Pruitt KD, Rodarmer K, Rubinstein W, Sayers EW, Schneider V, Schuler GD, Sherry ST, Sirotkin K, Siyan K, Slotta D, Soboleva A, Soussov V, Starchenko G, Tatusova TA, Todorov K, Trawick BW, Vakatov D, Wang YL, Ward M, Wilbur WJ, Yaschenko E, Zbicz K, Coordinators NR (2016) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D7–D19. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1290
Alsheimer M, von Glasenapp E, Schnolzer MN, Heid H, Benavente R (2000) Meiotic lamin C2: The unique amino-terminal hexapeptide GNAEGR is essential for nuclear envelope association. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13120–13125. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240466597
Andrade SCS, Novo M, Kawauchi GY, Worsaae K, Pleijel F, Giribet G, Rouse GW (2015) Articulating “Archiannelids”: phylogenomics and annelid relationships, with emphasis on meiofaunal taxa. Mol Biol Evol 32:2860–2875. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv157
Bánki O, Roskov Y, Döring M, Ower G, Vandepitte L, Hobern D, Remsen D, Schalk P, DeWalt RE, Keping M, Miller J, Orrell T, Aalbu R, Adlard R, Adriaenssens E, Aedo C, Aescht E, Akkari N, Alonso-Zarazaga MA et al (2022) Catalogue of Life Checklist. https://www.catalogueoflife.org
Bleidorn C (2019) Recent progress in reconstructing lophotrochozoan (spiralian) phylogeny. Org Divers Evol 19:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-019-00412-4
Bossie CA, Sanders MM (1993) A cDNA from Drosophila melanogaster encodes a lamin C-like intermediate filament protein. J Cell Sci 104(Pt 4):1263–1272
Brandt M (2015) Vergleichende Genstrukturanalyse der Lamingene ausgewählter Gruppen von Protostomiern. Diplom Thesis. Department of Biology and Chemistry. https://www.uni-bremen.de/fb2/
Burke B, Stewart CL (2013) The nuclear lamins: flexibility in function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 14:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3488
Chernyatina AA, Guzenko D, Strelkov SV (2015) Intermediate filament structure: the bottom-up approach. Curr Opin Cell Biol 32:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2014.12.007
Ciska M, Hikida R, Masuda K, de la Espina SMD (2019) Evolutionary history and structure of nuclear matrix constituent proteins, the plant analogues of lamins. J Exp Bot 70:2651–2664. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz102
Ciska M, de la Espina SMD (2013) NMCP/LINC proteins putative lamin analogs in plants?. Plant Signal Behav 8 https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.26669
Clarke S (1992) Protein isoprenylation and methylation at carboxyl-terminal cysteine residues. Annu Rev Biochem 61:355–386. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.002035
Corpet F (1988) Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res 16:10881–10890. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/16.22.10881
da Fonseca RR, Couto A, Machado AM, Brejova B, Albertin CB, Silva F, Gardner P, Baril T, Hayward A, Campos A, Ribeiro AM, Barrio-Hernandez I, Hoving HJ, Tafur-Jimenez R, Chu C, Frazao B, Petersen B, Penaloza F, Musacchia F, Alexander GC, Osorio H, Winkelmann I, Simakov O, Rasmussen S, Rahman MZ, Pisani D, Vinther J, Jarvis E, Zhang GJ, Strugnell JM, Castro LFC, Fedrigo O, Patricio M, Li QY, Rocha S, Antunes A, Wu YF, Ma B, Sanges R, Vinar T, Blagoev B, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Nielsen R, Gilbert MTP (2020) A draft genome sequence of the elusive giant squid, Architeuthis dux. Gigascience 9 https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz152
de Leeuw R, Gruenbaum Y, Medalia O (2018) Nuclear lamins: thin filaments with major functions. Trends Cell Biol 28:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2017.08.004
Dhe-Paganon S, Werner ED, Chi YI, Shoelson SE (2002) Structure of the globular tail of nuclear lamin. J Biol Chem 277:17381–17384. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C200038200
Eyres I, Boschetti C, Crisp A, Smith TP, Fontaneto D, Tunnacliffe A, Barraclough TG (2015) Horizontal gene transfer in bdelloid rotifers is ancient, ongoing and more frequent in species from desiccating habitats. BMC biology 13 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-015-0202-9
Fisher DZ, Chaudhary N, Blobel G (1986) cDNA sequencing of nuclear lamins A and C reveals primary and secondary structural homology to intermediate filament proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:6450–6454. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.17.6450
Flot JF, Hespeels B, Li X, Noel B, Arkhipova I, Danchin EGJ, Hejnol A, Henrissat B, Koszul R, Aury JM, Barbe V, Barthelemy RM, Bast J, Bazykin GA, Chabrol O, Couloux A, Da Rocha M, Da Silva C, Gladyshev E, Gouret P, Hallatschek O, Hecox-Lea B, Labadie K, Lejeune B, Piskurek O, Poulain J, Rodriguez F, Ryan JF, Vakhrusheva OA, Wajnberg E, Wirth B, Yushenova I, Kellis M, Kondrashov AS, Welch DBM, Pontarotti P, Weissenbach J, Wincker P, Jaillon O, Van Doninck K (2013) Genomic evidence for ameiotic evolution in the bdelloid rotifer Adineta vaga. Nature 500:453–457. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12326
Fontaneto D, Herniou EA, Boschetti C, Caprioli M, Melone G, Ricci C, Barraclough TG (2007) Independently evolving species in asexual bdelloid rotifers. PLoS Biol 5:914–921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050087
García-Varela M, Nadler SA (2006) Phylogenetic relationships among Syndermata inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.02.010
Gilbert JJ (2020) Variation in the life cycle of monogonont rotifers: commitment to sex and emergence from diapause. Freshwater Biol 65:786–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13440
Gleadall IG (2016) Octopus sinensis dÒrbigny, 1841 (Cephalopoda: Octopodae): valid species name for the commercially valuable east asian common Octopus. Species Diversity 21:31–42
Gray EG, Guillery RW (1963) On nuclear structure in the ventral nerve cord of the leech Hirudo-Medicinalis. Z Zellforsch Mik Ana 59:738–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00319069
Gribble KE, Welch DBM (2017) Genome-wide transcriptomics of aging in the rotifer Brachionus manjavacas, an emerging model system. BMC genomics 18 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3540-x
Gruenbaum Y, Foisner R (2015) Lamins: nuclear intermediate filament proteins with fundamental functions in nuclear mechanics and genome regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034115
Halanych KM, Kocot KM (2014) Repurposed transcriptomic data facilitate discovery of innate immunity Toll-like receptor (TLR) genes across Lophotrochozoa. Biol Bull-Us 227:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1086/BBLv227n2p201
Halanych KM, Bacheller JD, Aguinaldo AMA, Liva SM, Hillis DM, Lake JA (1995) Evidence from 18s Ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267:1641–1643. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7886451
Hanson SJ, Stelzer CP, Welch DBM, Logsdon JM (2013) Comparative transcriptome analysis of obligately asexual and cyclically sexual rotifers reveals genes with putative functions in sexual reproduction, dormancy, and asexual egg production. BMC Genomics 14 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-412
Helm C, Beckers P, Bartolomaeus T, Drukewitz SH, Kourtesis I, Weigert A, Purschke G, Worsaae K, Struck TH, Bleidorn C (2018) Convergent evolution of the ladder-like ventral nerve cord in Annelida. Front Zool 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-018-0280-y
Hennekes H, Nigg EA (1994) The role of isoprenylation in membrane attachment of nuclear lamins - a single-point mutation prevents proteolytic cleavage of the lamin-a precursor and confers membrane-binding properties. J Cell Sci 107:1019–1029
Herrmann H, Aebi U (2016) Intermediate filaments: structure and assembly. Csh Perspect Biol 8 https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a018242
Hofemeister H, Weber K, Stick R (2000) Association of prenylated proteins with the plasma membrane and the inner nuclear membrane is mediated by the same membrane-targeting motifs. Mol Biol Cell 11:3233–3246. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.9.3233
Holtz D, Tanaka RA, Hartwig J, Mckeon F (1989) The Caax motif of lamin a functions in conjunction with the nuclear-localization signal to target assembly to the nuclear-envelope. Cell 59:969–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90753-8
Kang HM, Kim MS, Choi BS, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Hwang UK, Hagiwara A, Lee JS (2020) The genome of the marine monogonont rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis and insight into species-specific detoxification components in Brachionus spp. Comp Biochem Phys D 36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2020.100714
Khemaissa S, Sagan S, Walrant A (2021) Tryptophan, an amino-acid endowed with unique properties and its many roles in membrane proteins. Crystals 11 https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11091032
Kim BM, Kang S, Ahn DH, Jung SH, Rhee H, Yoo JS, Lee JE, Lee S, Han YH, Ryu KB, Cho SJ, Park H, An HS (2018) The genome of common long-arm octopus Octopus minor. Gigascience 7 https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy119
Kim DH, Kim MS, Hagiwara A, Lee JS (2021) The genome of the minute marine rotifer Proales similis: Genome-wide identification of 401 G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) genes. Comp Biochem Phys D 39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2021.100861
Kocot KM (2016) On 20 years of Lophotrochozoa. Org Divers Evol 16:329–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-015-0261-3
Kocot KM, Poustka AJ, Stoger I, Halanych KM, Schrodl M (2020) New data from Monoplacophora and a carefully-curated dataset resolve molluscan relationships. Sci Rep-Uk 10 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56728-w
Kollmar M (2015) Polyphyly of nuclear lamin genes indicates an early eukaryotic origin of the metazoan-type intermediate filament proteins. Sci Rep-Uk 5 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10652
Koreny L, Field MC (2016) Ancient eukaryotic origin and evolutionary plasticity of nuclear lamina. Genome Biol Evol 8:2663–2671. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw087
Krohne G, Waizenegger I, Hoger TH (1989) The conserved carboxy-terminal cysteine of nuclear lamins is essential for lamin association with the nuclear-envelope. J Cell Biol 109:2003–2011. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.109.5.2003
Krüger A, Batsios P, Baumann O, Luckert E, Schwarz H, Stick R, Meyer I, Graf R (2012) Characterization of NE81, the first lamin-like nucleoskeleton protein in a unicellular organism. Mol Biol Cell 23:360–370. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-07-0595
Laumer CE, Fernandez R, Lemer S, Combosch D, Kocot K, Riesgo A, Andrade SCS, Sterrer W, Sorensen MV, Giribet G (2019) Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla (vol 286, 20190831, 2019). P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 286 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1941
Lee BY, Kim HS, Hwang DS, Won EJ, Choi BS, Choi IY, Park HG, Rhee JS, Lee JS (2015) Whole transcriptome analysis of the monogonont rotifer Brachionus koreanus provides molecular resources for developing biomarkers of carbohydrate metabolism. Comp Biochem Phys D 14:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2015.02.003
Lewin HA, Robinson GE, Kress WJ, Baker WJ, Coddington J, Crandall KA, Durbin R, Edwards SV, Forest F, Gilbert MTP, Goldstein MM, Grigoriev IV, Hackett KJ, Haussler D, Jarvis ED, Johnson WE, Patrinos A, Richards S, Castilla-Rubio JC, van Sluys MA, Soltis PS, Xu X, Yang HM, Zhang GJ (2018) Earth BioGenome Project: sequencing life for the future of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:4325–4333. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720115115
Li FH, Bian L, Ge JL, Han FM, Liu ZH, Li XM, Liu YS, Lin ZS, Shi HL, Liu CL, Chang Q, Lu B, Zhang SN, Hu JC, Xu DF, Shao CW, Chen SQ (2020) Chromosome-level genome assembly of the East Asian common octopus (Octopus sinensis) using PacBio sequencing and Hi-C technology. Mol Ecol Resour 20:1572–1582. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13216
Loewinger L, Mckeon F (1988) Mutations in the nuclear lamin proteins resulting in their aberrant assembly in the cytoplasm. EMBO J 7:2301–2309. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03073.x
Lu TM, Kanda M, Satoh N, Furuya H (2017) The phylogenetic position of dicyemid mesozoans offers insights into spiralian evolution. Zool Lett 3 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-017-0068-5
Marlétaz F, Peijnenburg KTCA, Goto T, Satoh N, Rokhsar DS (2019) A new spiralian phylogeny places the enigmatic arrow worms among gnathiferans. Current Biology 29: 312-+ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.042
Masuda K, Xu ZJ, Takahashi S, Ito A, Ono M, Nomura K, Inoue M (1997) Peripheral framework of carrot cell nucleus contains a novel protein predicted to exhibit a long alpha-helical domain. Exp Cell Res 232:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1997.3531
Mauer K, Hellmann SL, Groth M, Fröbius AC, Zischler H, Hankeln T, Herlyn H (2020) The genome, transcriptome, and proteome of the fish parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala). PloS one 15 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232973
Mauer KM, Schmidt H, Dittrich M, Frobius AC, Hellmann SL, Zischler H, Hankeln T, Herlyn H (2021) Genomics and transcriptomics of epizoic Seisonidea (Rotifera, syn. Syndermata) reveal strain formation and gradual gene loss with growing ties to the host. BMC genomics 22 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07857-y
McKeon F (1991) Nuclear lamin proteins: domains required for nuclear targeting, assembly, and cell-cycle-regulated dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol 3:82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-0674(91)90169-Y
MolluscaBase (eds) (2020) MolluscaBase. https://www.molluscabase.org
Nigg EA, Kitten GT, Vorburger K (1992) Targeting lamin proteins to the nuclear-envelope - the role of Caax box modifications. Biochem Soc T 20:500–504. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0200500
Ogura A, Yoshida M, Moritaki T, Okuda Y, Sese J, Shimizu KK, Sousounis K, Tsonis PA (2013) Loss of the six3/6 controlling pathways might have resulted in pinhole-eye evolution in Nautilus. Sci Rep-Uk 3 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01432
Patil S, Sengupta K (2021) Role of A- and B-type lamins in nuclear structure-function relationships. Biol Cell 113:295–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/boc.202000160
Peter A, Stick R (2012) Evolution of the lamin protein family: What introns can tell. Nucleus 3:44–59. https://doi.org/10.4161/nucl.18927
Peter A, Stick R (2015) Evolutionary aspects in intermediate filament proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 32C:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2014.12.009
Peter M, Nakagawa J, Doree M, Labbe JC, Nigg EA (1990) Invitro Disassembly of the Nuclear Lamina and M-Phase Specific Phosphorylation of Lamins by Cdc2 Kinase. Cell 61:591–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90471-P
Prokocimer M, Davidovich M, Nissim-Rafinia M, Wiesel-Motiuk N, Bar DZ, Barkan R, Meshorer E, Gruenbaum Y (2009) Nuclear lamins: key regulators of nuclear structure and activities. J Cell Mol Med 13:1059–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00676.x
Reid TS, Terry KL, Casey PJ, Beese LS (2004) Crystallographic analysis of CaaX prenyltransferases complexed with substrates defines rules of protein substrate selectivity. J Mol Biol 343:417–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.056
Rout MP, Field MC (2001) Isolation and characterization of subnuclear compartments from Trypanosoma brucei - identification of a major repetitive nuclear lamina component. J Biol Chem 276:38261–38271
Sielaff M, Schmidt H, Struck TH, Rosenkranz D, Welch DBM, Hankeln T, Herlyn H (2016) Phylogeny of Syndermata (syn. Rotifera): Mitochondrial gene order verifies epizoic Seisonidea as sister to endoparasitic Acanthocephala within monophyletic Hemirotifera. Mol Phylogenet Evol 96:79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.11.017
Stick R, Peter A (2020) Evolution of the lamin protein family at the base of the vertebrate lineage. Cell Tissue Res 379:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-019-03156-x
Stiller J, Tilic E, Rousset V, Pleijel F, Rouse GW (2020) Spaghetti to a Tree: A Robust Phylogeny for Terebelliformia (Annelida) Based on Transcriptomes, Molecular and Morphological Data. Biology-Basel 9 https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9040073
Stothard P (2000) The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques 28(1102):1104. https://doi.org/10.2144/00286ir01
Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hösel C, Kube M, Lieb B, Meyer A, Tiedemann R, Purschke G, Bleidorn C (2011) Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471:95-U113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09864
Struck TH, Wey-Fabrizius AR, Golombek A, Hering L, Weigert A, Bleidorn C, Klebow S, Iakovenko N, Hausdorf B, Petersen M, Kuck P, Herlyn H, Hankeln T (2014) Platyzoan Paraphyly Based on Phylogenomic Data Supports a Noncoelomate Ancestry of Spiralia. Mol Biol Evol 31:1833–1849. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu143
Struck TH, Golombek A, Weigert A, Franke FA, Westheide W, Purschke G, Bleidorn C, Halanych KM (2015) The Evolution of Annelids Reveals Two Adaptive Routes to the Interstitial Realm. Curr Biol 25:1993–1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.007
Tilic E, Sayyari E, Stiller J, Mirarab S, Rouse GW (2020) More is needed-Thousands of loci are required to elucidate the relationships of the 'flowers of the sea' (Sabellida, Annelida). Mol Phylogenet Evol 151 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106892
Tilic E, Stiller J, Campos E, Pleijel F, Rouse GW (2022) Phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within Aciculata (Errantia, Annelida). Molecular Phylogenet Evol 166 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107339
Uribe JE, Zardoya R (2017) Revisiting the phylogeny of Cephalopoda using complete mitochondrial genomes. J Molluscan Stud 83:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyw052
van Unen J, Botman D, Yin T, Wu YI, Hink MA, Gadella TWJ, Postma M, Goedhart J (2018) The C-terminus of the oncoprotein TGAT is necessary for plasma membrane association and efficient RhoA-mediated signaling. Bmc Cell Biol 19 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-018-0155-2
Wang H, Dittmer TA, Richrad EJ (2013) Arabidopsis CROWDED NUCLEI (CRWN) proteins are required for nuclear size control and heterochromatin organization. BMC Plant Biol 13:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-200
Wanninger A, Wollesen T (2019) The evolution of molluscs. Biol Rev 94:102–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12439
Weigert A, Bleidorn C (2016) Current status of annelid phylogeny. Org Divers Evol 16:345–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-016-0265-7
Weigert A, Helm C, Meyer M, Nickel B, Arendt D, Hausdorf B, Santos SR, Halanych KM, Purschke G, Bleidorn C, Struck TH (2014) Illuminating the Base of the Annelid Tree Using Transcriptomics. Mol Biol Evol 31:1391–1401. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu080
Wey-Fabrizius AR, Herlyn H, Rieger B, Rosenkranz D, Witek A, Welch DBM, Ebersberger I, Hankeln T (2014) Transcriptome Data Reveal Syndermatan Relationships and Suggest the Evolution of Endoparasitism in Acanthocephala via an Epizoic Stage. PloS one 9 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088618
Wong XR, Stewart CL (2020) The Laminopathies and the Insights They Provide into the Structural and Functional Organization of the Nucleus. Annu Rev Genom Hum G 21:263–288. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-121219-083616
Youens-Clark K, Bomhoff M, Ponsero AJ, Wood-Charlson EM, Lynch J, Choi I, Hartman JH, Hurwitz BL (2019) iMicrobe: Tools and data-driven discovery platform for the microbiome sciences (vol 8, giz083, 2019). Gigascience 8 https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz097
Zarrella I, Herten K, Maes GE, Tai SS, Yang M, Seuntjens E, Ritschard EA, Zach M, Styfhals R, Sanges R, Simakov O, Ponte G, Fiorito G (2019) The survey and reference assisted assembly of the Octopus vulgaris genome. Sci Data 6 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0017-6
Zhang Y, Mao F, Mu HW, Huang MW, Bao YB, Wang LL, Wong NK, Xiao S, Dai H, Xiang ZM, Ma ML, Xiong YY, Zhang ZW, Zhang LP, Song XY, Wang F, Mu XY, Li J, Ma HT, Zhang YH, Zheng HK, Simakov O, Yu ZN (2021) The genome of Nautilus pompilius illuminates eye evolution and biomineralization (vol 5, pg 927, 2021). Nat Ecol Evol 5:1637–1637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01571-4
Zimek A, Weber K (2011) Flanking genes of an essential gene give information about the evolution of metazoa. Eur J Cell Biol 90:356–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.10.005
Zverkov OA, Mikhailov KV, Isaev SV, Rusin LY, Popova OV, Logacheva MD, Penin AA, Moroz LL, Panchin YV, Lyubetsky VA, Aleoshin VV (2019) Dicyemida and orthonectida: two stories of body plan simplification. Front Genet 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00443
Acknowledgements
We were fortunate to have access to numerous transcriptome and genome assemblies for this work. Transcriptome and genome assemblies were kindly made available to us by Vladimir V. Aleoshin, Kenneth M. Halanych, Kevin M. Kocot, Christopher E. Laumer, Ferdinand Marlétaz, Katharina Mauer, Holger Herlyn, Atsushi Ogura, Josefin Stiller, Torsten H. Struck, Ekin Tilic, and Tsai-Ming Lu. For this, we would like to express our sincere thanks. For corrective support on the phylogeny of annelids, special thanks go to Ekin Tilic and Josefin Stiller. We thank Clara Huttenlauch and Irm Huttenlauch for critical reading the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Handling Editor: Peter Nick.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stick, R., Peter, A. CaaX-less lamins: Lophotrochozoa provide a glance at the playground of evolution. Protoplasma 260, 741–756 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-022-01809-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-022-01809-3