Abstract
The study of abiotic stress response of plants is important because they have to cope with environmental changes to survive. The plant genomes have evolved to meet environmental challenges. Salt, temperature, and drought are the main abiotic stresses. The tolerance and response to stress vary differently in plants. The idea was to analyze the genes showing differential expression under abiotic stresses. There are many pathways connecting the perception of external stimuli to cellular responses. In plants, these pathways play an important role in the transduction of abiotic stresses. In the present study, the gene expression data have been analyzed for their involvement in different steps of signaling pathways. The conserved genes were analyzed for their role in each pathway. The functional annotations of these genes and their response under abiotic stresses in other plant species were also studied. The enzymes of signal pathways, showing similarity with conserved genes, were analyzed for their role in different abiotic stresses. Our findings will help to understand the expression of genes in response to various abiotic stresses. These genes may be used to study the response of different abiotic stresses in other plant species and the molecular basis of stress tolerance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett T, Suzek TO, Troup DB, Wilhite SE, Ngau WC, Ledoux P, Rudnev D, Lash AE, Fujibuchi W, Edgar R (2005) NCBI GEO: mining millions of expression profiles—database and tools. Nucleic Acids Res 33(Database issue):D562–566. doi:10.1093/nar/gki022
Barrett T, Troup DB, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Rudnev D, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Soboleva A, Tomashevsky M, Edgar R (2007) NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles—database and tools update. Nucleic Acids Res 35(Database issue):D760–765. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl887
Begcy K, Mariano ED, Gentile A, Lembke CG, Zingaretti SM, Souza GM, Menossi M (2012) A novel stress-induced sugarcane gene confers tolerance to drought, salt, and oxidative stress in transgenic tobacco plants. PLoS One 7(9):e44697. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044697
Cattivell L, Baldi P, Crosatti C, Di Fonzo N, Faccioli P, Grossi M, Mastrangelo AM, Pecchioni N, Stanca AM (2002) Chromosome regions and stress-related sequences involved in resistance to abiotic stress in Triticeae. Plant Mol Biol 48(5–6):649–665
Cattivelli L, Baldi P, Crosatti C, Di Fonzo N, Faccioli P, Grossi M, Mastrangelo AM, Pecchioni N, Stanca AM (2002) Chromosome regions and stress-related sequences involved in resistance to abiotic stress in Triticeae. Plant Mol Biol 48(5):649–665. doi:10.1023/A:1014824404623
Chen L, Song Y, Li S, Zhang L, Zou C, Yu D (2012) The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819(2):120–128. doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.09.002
Evers D, Legay S, Lamoureux D, Hausman JF, Hoffmann L, Renaut J (2012) Towards a synthetic view of potato cold and salt stress response by transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Plant Mol Biol 78(4–5):503–514. doi:10.1007/s11103-012-9879-0
Jonak C, Kiegerl S, Ligterink W, Barker PJ, Huskisson NS, Hirt H (1996) Stress signaling in plants: a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is activated by cold and drought. P Natl Acad Sci USA 93(20):11274–11279. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.20.11274
Jonak C, Ligterink W, Hirt H (1999) MAP kinases in plant signal transduction. Cell Mol Life Sci 55(2):204–213. doi:10.1007/s000180050285
Kaur N, Gupta AK (2005) Signal transduction pathways under abiotic stresses in plants. Curr Sci India 88(11):1771–1780
Lata C, Yadav A, Prasad M (2010) Role of plant transcription factors in abiotic stress tolerance. In: Shanker A (ed) Abiotic Stress/Book2. INTECH Open Access Publishers, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 269–296
Mizoguchi T, Irie K, Hirayama T, Hayashida N, YamaguchiShinozaki K, Matsumoto K, Shinozaki K (1996) A gene encoding a mitogen-activated protein kinase is induced simultaneously with genes for a mitogen-activated protein kinase and an S6 ribosomal protein kinase by touch, cold, and water stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. P Natl Acad Sci USA 93(2):765–769. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.2.765
Perez-Amador MA, Leon J, Green PJ, Carbonell J (2002) Induction of the arginine decarboxylase ADC2 gene provides evidence for the involvement of polyamines in the wound response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 130(3):1454–1463. doi:10.1104/Pp.009951
Rabbani MA, Maruyama K, Abe H, Khan MA, Katsura K, Ito Y, Yoshiwara K, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Shinozaki KY (2003) Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel-blot analyses. Plant Physiol 133(4):1755–1767
Seo M, Koshiba T (2002) Complex regulation of ABA biosynthesis in plants. Trends Plant Sci 7(1):41–48
Walia H, Wilson C, Wahid A, Condamine P, Cui X, Close TJ (2006) Expression analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) during salinity stress. Funct Integr Genom 6(2):143–156. doi:10.1007/s10142-005-0013-0
Wang J, Sun PP, Chen CL, Wang Y, Fu XZ, Liu JH (2011) An arginine decarboxylase gene PtADC from Poncirus trifoliata confers abiotic stress tolerance and promotes primary root growth in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 62(8):2899–2914. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq463
Wilson C, Voronin V, Touraev A, Vicente O, Heberle-Bors E (1997) A developmentally regulated MAP kinase-activated by hydration in tobacco pollen. Plant Cell 9(11):2093–2100. doi:10.1105/tpc.9.11.20939
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank C Robin Buell who have submitted her experiments in GEO database of NCBI and made them freely available to the scientific community. One of the authors (Sanchita) is thankful to CSIR, New Delhi, India for CSIR-SRF fellowship.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that no conflicting interests exist.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Bhumi Nath Tripathi
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanchita, Dhawan, S.S. & Sharma, A. Analysis of differentially expressed genes in abiotic stress response and their role in signal transduction pathways. Protoplasma 251, 81–91 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0528-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0528-5