Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Floral developmental morphology of three Indigofera species (Leguminosae) and its systematic significance within Papilionoideae

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inflorescence and floral development of three species of Indigofera (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae), I. lespedezioides, I. spicata, and I. suffruticosa, were investigated and compared with that of other papilionoid groups, especially with members of the recently circumscribed Millettioid clade, which was merged as sister to Indigofereae in a recent cladistic analysis. Although Indigofera is a genus of special interest, because of its great richness in species and its economic importance, few studies have been made of floral development in the genus or in Indigofereae as a whole. Flower buds and inflorescences were analysed at several stages of development in the three species. Our results confirmed that Indigofera species bear a usual inflorescence type among legumes, the raceme, which comprises flowers initiated in acropetal succession, each with a subtending bract and no bracteoles initiated. The inception of the floral organs is as follows: sepals (5), petals (5), carpel (1), outer stamens (5), and, finally, inner stamens (5). Organ initiation in the sepal, petal, and both stamen whorls is unidirectional, from the abaxial side; the carpel cleft is adaxial. The vexillum is larger than other petals at maturity, covering the keels, which are fused edge-to-edge. Nine filaments are fused to form an adaxially open sheath, and the adaxial stamen of the inner whorl remains free (diadelphous androecium) in the mid-stage of development. Most of the infra-generic differences occurred in the later stages of development. Data on floral development in Indigofera obtained here were also compared with those from other members of Papilionoideae. This comparison showed that the early expression of zygomorphy is shared with other members of the Millettioid clade but is rarely found in other papilionoids, corresponding to a hypothetically morphological synapomorphy in the pair Indigoferae plus millettioids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figs. 1–18
Figs. 19–24
Figs. 25–28
Figs. 29–33
Figs. 34–41
Figs. 42–46
Figs. 47–50
Figs. 51–65
Figs. 66–68

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chappill J. A. (1995) Cladistic analysis of the Leguminosae––the development of an explicit phylogenetic hypothesis. Advances in legume systematics. Higher level systematics, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, part 7, pp 1–9

  • Dickison W (1981) The evolutionary relationships of the Leguminosae. In: Polhill RM, Raven PH (eds). Advances in Legume Systematics, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. part 1, pp 289–291

  • Doyle JJ, Chappill JA, Bailey CD, Kajita T (2000) Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence from rbcL sequences and non-molecular data. In: Herendeen PS, Bruneae A (eds). Advances in legume systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, part 9, pp 1–20

  • Endress PK (1994) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster AS, Gifford EM Jr. (1974) Comparative morphology of vascular plants. 2nd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

  • Gerlach G (1969) Botanische Mikrotechnik, eine Einführung. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart

  • Gerrits PO (1991) The application of glycol methacrylate in histotechnology; some fundamental principles. Department of Anatomy and Embryology, State University Groningen, Netherlands

  • Goldblatt P. (1981) Cytology and the phylogeny of Leguminosae. In: Polhill RM, Raven PH (eds) Advances in legume systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, part 2, pp 427–463

  • Greyson RI (1994) Inflorescences. In: Greyson RI (ed) The development of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 171–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell GJ, Slater AT, Knox RB (1993) Secondary pollen presentation in Angiosperms and its biological significance. Aust J Plant Sci 41:417–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland H, Pennington RT, Preston J (2000) Molecular systematics of the Swartzieae. In: Herendeen PS, Bruneau A (eds). Advances in legume systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, part 9, pp 217–231

  • Johansen DA (1940) Plant microtechnique. McGraw–Hill Book Company Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajita T, Ohashi H, Tateishi Y, Bailey CD, Doyle JJ (2001) rbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Milletieae, and allies. Syst Bot 26:515–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnovsky MJ (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137A–138A

    Google Scholar 

  • Käss E, Wink M (1996) Molecular evolution of the Leguminosae: phylogeny of the three subfamilies base on rbcL sequences. Biochem Syst Ecol 8:65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard BB (1999) Floral ontogeny in tribe Dalbergieae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae): Dalbergia brasiliensis, Machaerium villosum s l., Plastymiscium floribundum, and Pterocarpus rotundifolius. Plant Syst Evol 219:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis G, Schrire B, Mackinder B, Lock M (2005) Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillie RD (1954) Histopathologic technic and practical histochemistry. McGraw–Hill Book Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansano VF, Tucker SC, Tozzi AMGA (2002) Floral Ontogeny of Lecointea, Zollernia, Exoxtyles and Harleyodendron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Swartzieae S.L.). Am J Bot 89:1553–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquiafável FS, Ferreira MDS, Teixeira SP (2009) Novel reports of glands in Neotropical species of Indigofera L. (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae). Flora 204:189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Moço MCC, Mariath JEA (2009) Comparative floral ontogeny in Adesmia (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Dalbergieae). Aust J Bot 57:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira JLD, Tozzi AMGA (1997) Indigofera L (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) no estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Braz J Bot 20:97–117

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien TP, Feder N, McCully ME (1964) Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by toluidine blue O. Protoplasma 59:368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington RT, Lavin M, Ireland H, Klitgaard B, Preston J, Hu J (2001) Phylogenetic relationships of basal papilionoid legumes based upon sequences of chloroplast trnL intron. Syst Bot 26:537–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenner G (2004a) New aspects in floral development of Papilionoideae: Initiated but suppressed bracteoles and variable initiation of sepals. Ann Bot 93:537–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prenner G (2004b) The asymmetric androecium in Papilionoideae (Leguminosae): definition, occurrence, and possible systematic value. Int J Plant Sci 165:499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrire BD (2005) Tribe Indigofereae. In: Lewis G, Schrire B, Mackinder B, Lock M (eds) Legumes of the World. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrire BD, Lavin M, Barker NP, Cortes-Burns SH, Senger IV, Kim JH (2003) Towards a phylogeny of Indigofera (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae): identification of major clades and relative ages. Advances in legume systematics. Higher Level Systematics, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, part 10, pp 269–302

  • Schrire BD, Lavin M, Barker NP, Forest F (2009) Phylogeny of the tribe Indigofereae (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae): geographically structured more in succulent-rich and temperate settings than in grass-rich environments. Am J Bot 96:816–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Endress PK, Chase MW (2005) Floral diversification. In: Phylogeny and evolution of angiosperms. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. pp 269–286

  • Teixeira SP, Ranga TN, Tucker SC (2009) Inflorescence and floral development of Dahlstedtia species (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Millettieae). Flora 204:769–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker SC (1984) Unidirectional organ initiation in leguminous flowers. Am J Bot 71:1139–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker SC (1987) Floral initiation and development in legumes. In: Stirton CH (eds). Advances in legume systematics, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 3:183–239

  • Tucker SC (1997) Floral evolution, development, and convergence: the hierarchical-significance hypothesis. Int J Plant Sci 156:143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker SC (2003a) Floral development in legumes. Plant Physiol 131:911–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker SC (2003b) Floral Ontogeny in Swartzia (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Swartzieae): Distribution and role of the ring meristem. Am J Bot 90:1271–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker SC (2006) Floral ontogeny of Hardenbergia violacea (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Phaseoleae) and taxa of tribes Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae, with emphasis on presence of pseudoraceme inflorescence. Aust Syst Bot 19:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker SC, Kantz KE (2001) Open carpels with ovules in Fabaceae. Int J Plant Sci 162(5):1065–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerkamp C, Weber A (1999) Keel flowers of the Polygalaceae and Fabaceae: a functional comparison. Bot J Linn Soc 129:207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojciechowski MF, Lavin M, Sanderson MJ (2004) A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Am J Bot 91:1846–1862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Rao G (2006) Comparative study on the aerial and subterranean flower development in Amphicarpaea edgeworthii Benth (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae), an amphicarpic species. Int J Plant Sci 167:943–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Vidal de Freitas Mansano for many helpful comments, Dewey Litwiller (University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada) for English review, and Maria Dolores Seabra Ferreira, José Augusto Maulin (SEM Laboratory/BCMBP, FMRP-USP), Luciano Andrey Montouro, Rodrigo Ferreira Silva (SEM Laboratory/FFCLRP-USP), Viviane Gonçalves Leite, Giseli Donizete Pedersoli, and Mario Sadaiti Ogasawara (FCFRP-USP) for technical assistance. This study was supported by FAPESP (process number 2002/11834-5), CAPES, and CNPq (process numbers 301960/2009-7 and 307627/2009-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone de Pádua Teixeira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paulino, J.V., Groppo, M. & de Pádua Teixeira, S. Floral developmental morphology of three Indigofera species (Leguminosae) and its systematic significance within Papilionoideae. Plant Syst Evol 292, 165–176 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0405-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0405-z

Keywords

Navigation