Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of floral developments and its systematic importance in the genus Astragalus L. and Oxytropis DC. (Fabaceae, Leguminosae: Papilionoideae)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The initiation pattern of the floral organs of the Astragalus species displays uniqueness at the initial stages of ontogeny. However, its most common way is unidirectional initiation, which occurs from the abaxial to the adaxial sides. The overlapping of organs and the emergence of common primordia shortens the time of development and is of an evolutionary advantage to the genus. Astragalus species are constantly evolving, and they are bestowed with unique floral ontogeny that offers various advantages to these plants to survive and adapt to changing environmental conditions. The morphological features of the floral organ production of four Astragalus species were identical in the early and middle stages of development. During the middle and the late stages, some unique features such as rolled petals, sticky keel tips, diadelphous androecium were observed. Semi-circular receptacular nectaries were found in Astragalus henryi. Comparison of the inflorescence development between A. henryi and A. membranaceus revealed that A. membranaceus formed one terminal inflorescence, which developed into a raceme while A. henryi formed a variety of terminal inflorescences, branched by racemes to form panicles. Development of common primordia and organ overlap was also observed in both Oxytropis ochrocephala and Astragalus species. However, the most significant difference was observed in the keel petals of O. ochrocephala, which developed a beak at the later stages of development. The study unravels interesting relationships between four species of Astragalus and one species of Oxytropis. Study of floral ontogeny through series of sections using various microscopic techniques provided insights into the understudied floral traits of the genera. Such studies also need to be corroborated with other empirical evidence and analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Natural National Science Foundation of China (Project No. 31110103911) and the Science and Technology Basic Work (Grant No. 2013FY112100) for the necessary funding for the research.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

The research was financially supported by the Natural National Science Foundation of China (Project No. 31110103911) and the Science and Technology Basic Work (Grant No. 2013FY112100).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WY and SAR developed a project. WY wrote and SAR revised the manuscript. WY tested initial experiments. WJ helped in the translation of some Chinese references. ZL and CZ supervised the research work and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaoyang Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have given consent.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rather, S.A., Wei, Y., Wang, J. et al. Comparative study of floral developments and its systematic importance in the genus Astragalus L. and Oxytropis DC. (Fabaceae, Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Biologia 76, 865–888 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00688-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00688-y

Keywords

Navigation