Skip to main content
Log in

New insights into pollen morphology and its implications in the phylogeny of Sanguisorba L. (Rosaceae; Sanguisorbeae)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pollen morphology of 13 species of the genus Sanguisorba (Rosaceae) was examined by light and scanning electron microscopy. The pollen morphology divided the genus into two main groups: (A) tricolporate with tapered colpus tips, and (B) either tricolporate with opened colpus tip or hexacolporate. The former group was further subdivided into those without vestibulum (A1: S. alpina, S. dodecandra, and S. filiformis) and those with vestibulum (A2: S. agrimonoides, S. ancestroides, S. annua, S. cretica, S. minor, and S. verrucosa), whereas the latter group was subdivided into those with colpus narrow and similar to the A1 type (B1: S. canadensis and S. diandra), those with colpus and mesocolpus somewhat equally wide and forming hexacolporate aperture (B3: S. albiflora, S. armena, S. media, S. menziesii, S. parviflora, S. stipulata, and S. tenuifolia), and those with colpus intermediate between the B1 and B3 types (B2: S. hakusanensis, S. microcephala, S. obtusa, S. officinalis, S. polygama, and S. sitchensis). It is suggested that the A1 type aperture would have evolved to the A2 type as a specialized form and the B types (B1 to B3) in a direction in which the hexacolporate aperture was derived. Implications of pollen morphology for infrageneric classification of Sanguisorba are discussed and the results are compared with molecular phylogenetic studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Asab MS, Cantino PD, Nowicke JW, Sang T (1993) Systematic implications of pollen morphology in Caryopteris (Labiatae). Syst Bot 18:502–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiton W (1789) Hortus kewensis. III. George Nicol, London

  • Bawa KS (1980) Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Ann Rev of Ecol Syst 11:15–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham G, Hooker JD (1865) Genera Plantarum. Reeve & Co., London, vol 1

  • Bertoloni A (1835) Flora Italica. II, add. Bononiae

  • Brown A, Bouché C (1867) Sanguisorba. Index seminum horti botanici Berolinenesis. Appendix, Berolini

  • Chung Y, Lee S (1990) A palynotaxonomic study of the Sophora group (Sophoreae, Papilionoideae, Leguminosae). Korean J Pl Taxon 20:257–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung K-S, Elisens WJ, Skvarla JJ (2010) Pollen morphology and its phylogenetic significance in tribe Sanguisorbeae (Rosaceae). Plant Syst Evol 285:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RL, Osborn JM, Philbrick CT (2000) Comparative pollen morphology and ultrastructure of Callitrichaceae. Am J Bot 87:161–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist A (1968) The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • De Candolle AP (1825) Prodromus systematis naturalis. Regni Vegetabilis, II. Paisiiis

  • Eide F (1981) Key for northwest European Rosaceae pollen. Grana 20:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman G (1960) The acetolysis method. Sven Bot Tidsk 54:562–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman G (1966) Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. Hafner Bubl. Co., New York

  • Graham A, Nowicke J, Skvarla JJ, Graham SA, Patel V, Lee S (1985) Palynology and systematics of the Lythraceae. 1. Introduction and genera Adenaria through Ginoria. Am J Bot 72:1012–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham A, Nowicke J, Skvarla JJ, Graham SA, Patel V, Lee S (1987) Palynology and systematics of the Lythraceae. 2. Genera Haitia through Peplis. Am J Bot 74:829–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham A, Nowicke J, Skvarla JJ, Graham SA, Patel V, Lee S (1990) Palynology and systematics of the Lythraceae. 3. Genera Physocalymma through Woodfordia, addenda, and conclusions. Am J Bot 77:159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfgott DM, Francisco-Ortega J, Santo-Guerra A, Jansen RK, Simpson BB (2000) Biogeography and breeding system evolution of the woody Bencomia Alliance (Rosaceae) in Macaronesia based on ITS sequence data. Syst Bot 25:82–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson J (1964) The genera of flowering plants. vol 1. Clarendon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikuse M (1955) General survey list of pollen grains in Japan (6). Bot Mag (Tokyo) 30:303–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr MS (2004) A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of Sanguisorbeae (Rosaceae), with emphasis on the Pleistocene radiation of the high Andean genus Polylepsis. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park

  • Kim KH, Lee S (1978) Contribution to the pollen morphology and taxonomy of Korean gymnosperms on the general level. Korean J Forestry 40:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (1992) Palylnological relationships among Calathodes and its relative genera. Korean J Pl Taxon 22:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Blackmore B (1992) A palynotaxonomic study of the genus Trollius L. (Ranunculaceae). Grana 31:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Chung Y, Lee C (1993) Palynological relationships between Pectactina rupicola Nakai and its relative taxa. Korean J Pl Taxon 23:149–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus C (1753) Species plantarum. Tomus, vol 1, p 116

  • Mishima M, Ito M (1996) Phylogeny of Japanese species of Sanguisorba (Rosaceae) based on RFLPs of PCR-amplified cpDNA fragments. Acta Phytotax Geobot 47:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishima M, Iwatsubo Y, Horti Y, Naruhashi N (1998) Chromosome numbers in Sanguisorba albiflora (Makino) Makino (Rosaceae). J Jpn Bot 73:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishima M, Ohmido N, Fukui K, Yahara T (2002) Trends in site-number change of rDNA loci during polyploidy evolution in Sanguisorba (Rosaceae). Chromosoma 110:550–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller J (1970) Palynological evidence on early differentiation of angiosperms. Biol Rev 45:417–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordborg G (1963) Studies in Sanguisorba officinalis L. Kromosomtalsbestämningar på svenskt maerial. Bot Not 116:266–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordborg G (1966) Sanguisorba L., Sarcopoterium Spach, and Bencomia Webb et Berth. Delimitation and Subdivision of the Genera. Opera Bot 11:1–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordborg G (1967) The genus Sanguisorba section Poterium: experimental studies and taxonomy. Lund Opera Bot 16:1–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicke JW, Skvarla JJ (1981) Pollen morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the Berberidaceae. Smithsonian Contribution to Botany 50, pp 1–83

  • Pérez de Paz J (1981) Estudio preliminary del pollen de los generos Macaronesicos Bencomia, Marcetella y Dendriopoterium (Rosaceae: Sanguisorbeae). Bot Macaronesica 8–9:41–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez de Paz J (2004) Rosaceae-Sanguisorbeae de Macaronesia: Géneros Marcetella, Bencomia y Dendriopoterium. Palinología, biogeografía, sistemas sexuales y filogenia. Bot Macaronesica 25:95–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter D, Eriksson T, Evans RC, Oh S, Smedmark JEE, Morgan DR, Kerr M, Robertson KR, Arsenault M, Dickinson TA, Campbell CS (2007) Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Pl Syst Evol 266:5–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punt W, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Le Thomas A (1994) Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. LPP Contributions Ser. 1. LPP Foundation, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma TJ (1966) Some aspects of the pollen morphology of the genus Sanguisorba L. (Rosaceae). Rev Paleobot Palynol 4:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scopoli IA (1772) Flora carniolica, I. Vindbonensis

  • Spach E (1846) Revisio generis Poterium. Annles des Sciences Naturelles 3, Ser. Botanque 5:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Sventenius ER (1948) Estudio taxonómico del género Bencomia. Inst Nac Invest Agron 18(95):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Sventenius ER (1960) Additamentum ad Floram Canariensem. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrómonicas Ministerio de Agricultura, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan A (1969) Flowering plants: origin and dispersal. Smithsonian Inst Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne RF (1968) Synopsis of a putatively phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 64:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor JE, Van Wyk AE (2001) Pollen morphology of Euchaetis and Macrostylis (Diosminae-Rutaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Grana 40:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker JW (1971) Pollen morphology, phytogeography, and phylogeny of the Annonaceae. Contrib Gray Herb Harvard 202:1–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker JW (1974) Aperture evolution in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. Am J Bot 60:1112–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker JW, Doyle JA (1975) The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 62:664–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb D, Berthelot C (1836) Historie Naturelle des Isles Canaries. III. 2, Paris

  • Wen J, Nowicke JW (1999) Pollen ultrastructure of Panax (The ginseng genus, Araliaceae), An eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunctions. Am J Bot 86:1624–1636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper represents partial fulfillment of an MS degree in Biological Education for the third author (J.C.), submitted at Sungkyunkwan University. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Chul Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S., Heo, Ki., Cho, J. et al. New insights into pollen morphology and its implications in the phylogeny of Sanguisorba L. (Rosaceae; Sanguisorbeae). Plant Syst Evol 291, 227–242 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0384-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0384-0

Keywords

Navigation