Skip to main content
Log in

An Energy-Based Method to Determine Rock Brittleness by Considering Rock Damage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate evaluations of rock brittleness are very significant in the engineering geology and geotechnical engineering fields. Most previous studies have adopted the stress–strain relationship to propose a series of indices for rock brittleness estimations but have seldom considered rock damage. Rock damage can be viewed as an energy dissipation process during rock deformation, which is closely related to rock brittleness. In this study, a new brittleness index (BI23) was proposed by considering rock damage, and the rock damage was calculated by the energy-based method. Then, the newly proposed rock brittleness index was validated by analyzing the variations in rock brittleness under increasing confining pressures and temperatures. The results indicate that the rock brittleness estimated by BI23 shows a significant drop in the case of increasing confining pressures and temperatures. To demonstrate its performance and advantages, a comparative study between the BI23 index and some previous indices was conducted by analyzing the stress–strain curves (SSC) of four rock types (e.g., limestone, marlite, feldspar lithic sandstone, and feldspathic quartz sandstone). The comparative study shows that the BI23 is able to produce more stable and consistent rock brittleness even for the same rock type under different tests, which is considered to be a major improvement over previous indices. Finally, the brittleness value distribution patterns of BI23 for normal and extreme conditions are discussed. It is suggested that the scope of rock brittleness evaluations under normal conditions should be defined to be between 0.5 (ductile) and 1 (brittle) in practical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BI:

Brittleness index

BIs:

Brittleness indices

UCS:

Uniaxial compressive strength

SSC:

Stress–strain curve

CLT:

Cycling loading test

BTS:

Brazilian tensile strength

DM method:

Deformation modulus-based method

EN method:

Energy-based method

SS method:

Stress-based method

SA method:

Strain-based method

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

E:

Loading elastic modulus

\(E_{0}\) :

Elastic modulus

M :

Post-peak elastic modulus

\(\rho\) :

Density

ν:

Poisson’s ratio

\(D_{i}\) :

Damage degree

\(U_{i}\) :

Total energy increment

\(U_{i}^{d}\) :

Dissipation energy

\(U_{i}^{e}\) :

Elastic energy increment

\(U_{T}^{d}\) :

Total dissipated energy

\(\sum U_{i}^{d}\) :

Accumulated dissipated energy

\(\sigma_{e}\) :

Stress at the elastic limit

\(\sigma_{p}\) :

Peak stress

\(\sigma_{r}\) :

Residual stress

\(\sigma_{1}\) :

Maximum principle stress

\(\sigma_{3}\) :

Minimum principle stress

\(\sigma_{3}\) :

Maximum tensile strength

\(\varepsilon_{e}\) :

Strain at the elastic limit

\(E_{d}\) :

Deformation energy

\(E_{G}\) :

Surface energy

\(\varepsilon_{p}\) :

Strain at the peak point

\(\varepsilon_{i}\) :

Irreversible deformation

\(\varepsilon_{r}\) :

Strain at the residual point

\(\varepsilon_{tot}\) :

Total strain at failure

\(\varepsilon_{el}\) :

Elastic strain at failure

\(W_{ir}\) :

Unrecoverable elastic energy

\(W_{pe}\) :

Pre-peak elastic strain energy

\(W_{r}\) :

Restore elasticity energy

\(W_{tos}\) :

Total strain energy

\(W_{el}\) :

Elastic energy at failure

\(W_{tot}\) :

Total energy at failure

\(W_{et}\) :

Total elastic energy

\(W_{er}\) :

Rupture energy

\(W_{e}\) :

Consumed elastic energy

\(W_{p}\) :

Dissipated plastic energy

\(dW_{r}\) :

Rupture energy increment

\(dW_{e}\) :

Unloading elastic energy increment

References

  • Ai C, Zhang J, Li Y-W, Zeng J, Yang X-L, Wang J-G (2016) Estimation criteria for rock brittleness based on energy analysis during the rupturing process. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(12):4681–4698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altindag R (2002) The evaluation of rock brittleness concept on rotary blast hole drills. J S Afr Inst Min Metal 102(1):61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Altındağ R, Güney A (2010) Predicting the relationships between brittleness and mechanical properties (UCS, TS and SH) of rocks

  • Andreev GE (1995) Brittle failure of rock materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron L, Loguntsov B, Posin E (1962) Determination of properties of rocks. Gosgortekhizdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernabé Y, Revil A (1995) Pore-scale heterogeneity, energy dissipation and the transport properties of rocks. Geophys Res Lett 22(12):1529–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop A (1967) Progressive failure-with special reference to the mechanism causing it. Proc Geotech Conf Oslo 2:142

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, He C, Ma G, Xu G, Ma C (2018) Energy damage evolution mechanism of rock and its application to brittleness evaluation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(4):1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1681-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhang L, Xie H, Liu J, Liu H, Yang B (2019) Damage ratio based on statistical damage constitutive model for rock. Math Prob Eng 2019:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Q-L, Ju F, Mao X-B, Ma D, Yu B-Y, Song S-B (2016) Experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior in unloading conditions of sandstone after high-temperature treatment. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(7):2641–2653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0944-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erarslan N (2016) Microstructural investigation of subcritical crack propagation and fracture process zone (FPZ) by the reduction of rock fracture toughness under cyclic loading. Eng Geol 208:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng R, Zhang Y, Rezagholilou A, Roshan H, Sarmadivaleh M (2020) Brittleness index: from conventional to hydraulic fracturing energy model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(2):739–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodway B, Perez M, Varsek J, Abaco C (2010) Seismic petrophysics and isotropic-anisotropic AVO methods for unconventional gas exploration. Lead Edge 29(12):1500–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J-C, Zhao Z-H, He S-G, Liang H, Liu Y-X (2015) A new method for shale brittleness evaluation. Environ Earth Sci 73(10):5855–5865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4268-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajiabdolmajid V, Kaiser P (2003) Brittleness of rock and stability assessment in hard rock tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 18(1):35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-7798(02)00100-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao TS, Liang WG (2015) A new improved failure criterion for salt rock based on energy method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(5):1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0851-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Xu C (2016) Specific energy as an index to identify the critical failure mode transition depth in rock cutting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(4):1461-1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RM, Fjær E, Stenebråten JF, Nes O-M (2015) Brittleness of shales: relevance to borehole collapse and hydraulic fracturing. J Petrol Sci Eng 131:200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu K, Shao J-F, Zhu Q-Z, Zhao L-Y, Wang W, Wang R-B (2020) A micro-mechanics-based elastoplastic friction-damage model for brittle rocks and its application in deformation analysis of the left bank slope of Jinping I hydropower station. Acta Geotech 15(12):3443–3460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00977-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hucka V, Das B (1974) Brittleness determination of rocks by different methods. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 11:389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo Z, Zhang J, Li P, Tang X, Yang X, Qiu Q, Li Z (2018) An improved evaluation method for the brittleness index of shale and its application—a case study from the southern north China basin. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 59:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram GM, Urai JL (1999) Top-seal leakage through faults and fractures: the role of mudrock properties. Geol Soc London Spec Publ 158(1):125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie DM, Hill RJ, Ruble TE, Pollastro RM (2007) Unconventional shale-gas systems: the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bull 91(4):475–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser P, Tang C (1998) Numerical simulation of damage accumulation and seismic energy release during brittle rock failure—Part II: rib pillar collapse. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(2):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazaei C, Hazzard J, Chalaturnyk R (2015) Damage quantification of intact rocks using acoustic emission energies recorded during uniaxial compression test and discrete element modeling. Comput Geotech 67:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidybiński A (1981) Bursting liability indices of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 18:295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-S, Lee K-S, Cho W-J, Choi H-J, Cho G-C (2014) A comparative evaluation of stress-strain and acoustic emission methods for quantitative damage assessments of brittle rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(2):495–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0590-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivi IR, Ameri M, Molladavoodi H (2018) Shale brittleness evaluation based on energy balance analysis of stress-strain curves. J Petrol Sci Eng 167:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawal LO, Mahmoud M, Adebayo A, Sultan A (2021) Brittleness and microcracks: a new approach of brittleness characterization for shale fracking. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Zou Y, Zhang S, Ma X, Zhu X, Li S, Cao T (2019) Rock brittleness evaluation based on energy dissipation under triaxial compression. J Petrol Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Xu J (2015) Analysis on damage mechanical characteristics of marble exposed to high temperature. Int J Damage Mech 24(8):1180–1193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789515570507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan X, Di B, Wei J, Li X, Qian K, Xie J, Ding P (2014) Laboratory measurements of brittleness anisotropy in synthetic shale with different cementation. SEG Tech Prog Expand Abst 204:3005–3009

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerhofer MJ, Lolon E, Warpinski NR, Cipolla CL, Walser D, Rightmire CM (2010) What is stimulated reservoir volume? SPE Prod Oper 25(01):89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Zhou H, Zhang C, Xu R, Lu J (2014) Evaluation methodology of brittleness of rock based on post-peak stress-strain curves. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(5):1787–1805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0694-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz H, Taheri A, Chanda EK (2016) Fracture energy-based brittleness index development and brittleness quantification by pre-peak strength parameters in rock uniaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(12):4587–4606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1071-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejati HR, Ghazvinian A (2013) Brittleness effect on rock fatigue damage evolution. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(5):1839–1848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0486-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou P, Papamichos E, Atkinson C (2016) On the risk of hydraulic fracturing in CO2 geological storage. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 40(10):1472–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou P, Atkinson C (2015) The brittleness index in hydraulic fracturing. Paper presented at the 49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium

  • Rickman R, Mullen MJ, Petre JE, Grieser WV, Kundert D (2008) A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: All shale plays are not clones of the Barnett Shale. Paper presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition

  • Rybacki E, Meier T, Dresen G (2016) What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks? Part II: brittleness. J Petrol Sci Eng 144:39–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.02.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RK, Chopra S (2012) New attribute for determination of lithology and brittleness. Paper presented at the SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012

  • Song D, Wang E, Liu J (2012) Relationship between EMR and dissipated energy of coal rock mass during cyclic loading process. Saf Sci 50(4):751–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Wang K, Yang P, Li X, Sun J, Liu B, Jin K (2013) Integrated prediction of shale oil reservoir using pre-stack algorithms for brittleness and fracture detection. Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference

  • Tarasov B (2019) Dramatic weakening and embrittlement of intact hard rocks in the earth’s crust at seismic depths as a cause of shallow earthquakes. In: Earth crust. IntechOpen

  • Tarasov B, Potvin Y (2013) Universal criteria for rock brittleness estimation under triaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 59:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Zhang T, Ranjith PG, Li Y, Song Z, Wang S, Zhao W (2020) A new approach to the evaluation of rock mass rupture and brittleness under triaxial stress condition. J Petrol Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei S, Yang Y, Su C, Cardosh SR, Wang H (2019) Experimental study of the effect of high temperature on the mechanical properties of coarse sandstone. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Kulatilake PHSW, Zhao G, Liang W, Wang E (2019) A comprehensive study of fracture evolution of brittle rock containing an inverted U-shaped cavity under uniaxial compression. Comput Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie H, Ju Y, Li L (2005) Criteria for strength and structural failure of rocks based on energy dissipation and energy release principles. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 24(17):3003–3010

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagiz S (2009) Assessment of brittleness using rock strength and density with punch penetration test. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24(1):66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2008.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DC, Ranjith PG, Perera MSA (2016) The brittleness indices used in rock mechanics and their application in shale hydraulic fracturing: a review. J Petrol Sci Eng 143:158–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Feng X-T, Zhang X, Yang C (2019) Brittle and ductile creep behavior of Jinping marble under true triaxial stress. Eng Geol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has received financial support from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Grant No. 42177159 & No. 41877253) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (Grant No. CUG2106304). The supports are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Chai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Wang, Y., Chai, B. et al. An Energy-Based Method to Determine Rock Brittleness by Considering Rock Damage. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55, 1585–1597 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02727-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02727-1

Keywords

Navigation