Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New Rock Brittleness Index Based on the Peak Elastic Strain Energy Consumption Ratio

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 February 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

To evaluate rock brittleness more accurately, a new rock brittleness index based on the peak elastic strain energy consumption ratio (PEECR) was proposed in this study. Considering the relationship between rock brittleness and energy evolution characteristics of rock materials under confining pressure, the PEECR was defined as the dissipated proportion of peak elastic strain energy relative to failure energy and residual elastic strain energy (the maximum value of PEECR is 1.0, which indicates the corresponding rock will fail immediately after reaching the peak strength). The evaluation accuracy of the PEECR was verified based on the conventional triaxial compression tests on shale under six confining pressures, and the universality of the PEECR was also analyzed according to test data of six types of rocks from previous studies. The results show that the PEECR continuously decreases with the increasing of confining pressures, and is suitable for various types of rocks and a wider range of brittleness degrees. Finally, the evaluation accuracies of the PEECR and 11 existing rock brittleness energy indexes were compared and analyzed, and the results indicate that PEECR can evaluate rock brittleness more accurately.

Highlights

  • A new rock brittleness index based on peak elastic strain energy consumption ratio (PEECR) was proposed considering the relationship between the rock brittleness and energy evolution characteristics of rock materials under confining pressures.

  • It is verified based on conventional triaxial compression tests that PEECR can accurately evaluate rock brittleness, and is suitable for various types of rocks and a wider range of brittleness degrees.

  • The evaluation accuracy for rock brittleness of PEECR is higher than other existing indexes by comparison based on test results, and PEECR can be popularized in practical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Abbreviations

BIER :

Peak elastic strain energy consumption ratio

E :

Pre-peak elastic modulus

σ 1 :

Axial stress

σ 3 :

Circumferential stress

σ p :

Peak strength

σ r :

Residual strength

ε d :

Axial strain when peak stress is unloaded to 0

ε r :

Axial strain at the beginning point of residual strength stage

ε u :

Axial strain when the residual stress is unloaded to 0

εp :

Peak axial strain

U e p :

Peak elastic strain density

U f :

Failure energy density

U e r :

Residual elastic strain energy density

U a :

Additional input energy density

U ec :

Consumed elastic strain energy density during the failure process

U d p :

Peak dissipated energy density

U ei :

Peak elastic strain energy of the absolute brittle rock

References

  • Ai C, Zhang J, Li YW, Zeng J, Yang XL, Wang JG (2016) Estimation criteria for rock brittleness based on energy analysis during the rupturing process. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4681–4698

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Kaiser PK, Tasaka Y, Maejima T, Morioka H, Minami M (2004) Generalized crack initiation and crack damage stress thresholds of brittle rock masses near underground excavations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:833–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Hou PY, Zhang XW, Feng XT (2021) Post-peak Stress-Strain curves of brittle hard rocks under axial-strain-controlled loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 147:104921

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Jin Y, Chen M (2015) A rock brittleness evaluation method based on energy dissipation. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 47(6):984–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Jin Y, Chen M, Yi ZC, Zheng XJ (2017) Quantitative evaluation of rock brittleness based on the energy dissipation principle, an application to type II mode crack. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 45:527–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Copur H, Bilgin N, Tuncdemir H, Balci C (2003) A set of indices based on indentation tests for assessment of rock cutting performance and rock properties. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 103(9):589–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan M, Jin Y, Chen M, Geng Z (2019) Mechanical characterization of shale through instrumented indentation test. J Pet Sci Eng 174:607–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong X, Sun CC (2015) A new tablet brittleness index. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 93:260–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong FQ, Yan JY, Li XB (2018) A new criterion of rock burst proneness based on the linear energy storage law and the residual elastic energy index. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 37(9):1993–2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong FQ, Yan JY, Luo S, Li XB (2019) Investigation on the linear energy storage and dissipation laws of rock materials under uniaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:4237–4255

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong FQ, Wang YL, Wang ZG, Pan JF, Luo S (2021) A new criterion of coal burst proneness based on the residual elastic strain energy index. Int J Min Sci Technol 31(4):553–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong FQ, Shi RH, Xu L (2022) Linear energy storage and dissipation laws of concrete under uniaxial compression at different ages. Constr Build Mater 318:125963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo TK, Zhang SC, Ge HK, Wang XQ, Lei X, Xiao B (2015) A new method for evaluation of fracture network formation capacity of rock. Fuel 140:778–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajiabdolmajid V, Kaiser P (2003) Brittleness of rock and stability assessment in hard rock tunnelling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 18:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucka V, Das B (1974) Brittleness determination of rocks by different methods. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 11(10):389–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo ZP, Zhang JC, Li P, Tang X, Yang X, Qiu QL, Dong Z, Li Z (2018) An improved evaluation method for the brittleness index of shale and its application—A case study from the southern north China basin. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 59:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JC, Cook NG, Zimmerman R (2007) Fundamentals of rock mechanics, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie DM, Hill RJ, Ruble TE, Pollastro RM (2007) Unconventional shale-gas systems: the Mississippian Barnett Shale of northcentral Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bull 91(4):475–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaunda RB, Asbury BP (2016) Prediction of rock brittleness using nondestructive methods for hard rock tunneling. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(4):533–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal M, Faradonbeh RS, Monjezi M, Armaghani DJ, Majid MZ (2017) Function development for appraising brittleness of intact rocks using genetic programming and non-linear multiple regression models. Eng Comput 33(1):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim T, Hwang S, Jang S (2017) Petrophysical approach for S-wave velocity prediction based on brittleness index and total organic carbon of shale gas reservoir: a case study from Horn River Basin, Canada. J Appl Geophys 136:513–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivi IR, Ameri M, Molladavoodi H (2018) Shale brittleness evaluation based on energy balance analysis of stress-strain curves. J Pet Sci Eng 167:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuang ZH, Qiu SL, Li SJ, Du SH, Huang Y, Chen XQ (2021) A new rock brittleness index based on the characteristics of complete stress-strain behaviors. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54:1109–1128

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai J, Wang GW, Huang LX, Li WL, Ran Y, Wang D, Zhou ZL, Chen J (2015) Brittleness index estimation in a tight shaly sandstone reservoir using well logs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 27:1536–1545

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn BR, Marshall DB (1979) Hardness, toughness, and brittleness: an indentation analysis. J Am Ceram Soc 62(7–8):347–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Li LL, Gong FQ (2020) Experimental investigation on the energy storage characteristics of red sandstone in triaxial compression tests with constant confining pressure. Shock Vib 10:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Zou YS, Zhang SC, Ma XF, Zhu XW, Li SH, Cao T (2019a) Rock brittleness evaluation based on energy dissipation under triaxial compression. J Pet Sci Eng 183:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Li LC, Zhai MY, Zhang LY, Zhang ZL, Huang B, Li AL, Zuo JQ, Zhang QS (2019b) Brittleness evaluation of glutenite based on energy balance and damage evolution. Energies 12(18):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YW, Zhou LH, Li DP, Zhang SC, Tian FC, Xie ZM, Liu B (2020) Shale brittleness index based on the energy evolution theory and evaluation with logging data: a case study of the Guandong block. ACS Omega 5:13164–13175

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng FZ, Zhou H, Zhang CQ, Xu RC, Lu JJ (2015) Evaluation methodology of brittleness of rock based on post-peak stress–strain curves. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1787–1805

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng QB, Wang CK, Huang BX, Pu H, Zhang ZZ, Sun W, Wang J (2020) Rock energy evolution and distribution law under triaxial cyclic loading and unloading conditions. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 39(10):2047–2059

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng FZ, Wong LNY, Zhou H (2021) Rock brittleness indices and their applications to different fields of rock engineering: a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 13(1):221–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam A, Harris NB, Ayranci K, Gomez JS, Angulo NA, Chalaturnyk R (2019) Brittleness in the Devonian Horn River shale, British Columbia, Canada. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 62:247–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Wang J, Ge XM, Han ZY, Qu GZ, Jiang S (2017) A new method for rock brittleness evaluation in tight oil formation from conventional logs and petrophysical data. J Pet Sci Eng 151:169–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi GC, Chen G, Pan YT, Yang XL, Liu Y, Dai GZ (2019) Stress-drop effect on brittleness evaluation of rock materials. J Cent South Univ 26(7):1807–1819

    Google Scholar 

  • Song HQ, Zuo JP, Chen Y, Li LY, Hong ZJ (2019) Revised energy drop coefficient based on energy characteristics in whole process of rock failure. Rock Soil Mech 40(1):91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Su YQ, Gong FQ, Luo S, Liu ZX (2021) Experimental study on energy storage and dissipation characteristics of granite under two-dimensional compression with constant confining pressure. J Cent South Univ 28:848–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Suorineni FT, Chinnasane DR, Kaiser PK (2009) A procedure for determining rock-type specific Hoek-Brown brittle parameter s. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42(6):849–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang XM, Xu S, Zhuang C, Su YD, Chen XL (2016) Quantitative evaluation of rock brittleness and fracability based on elastic-wave velocity variation around borehole. Pet Explor Dev 43(3):457–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarasovn BG, Potvin Y (2013) Universal criteria for rock brittleness estimation under triaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 59:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarasovn BG, Randolph MF (2011) Superbrittleness of rocks and earthquake activity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:888–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SF, Tang Y, Wang SY (2021) Influence of brittleness and confining stress on rockcuttability based on rock indentation tests. J Cent South Univ 28(9):2786–2800

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia YJ, Li LC, Tang CA, Li XY, Ma S, Li M (2017) A new method to evaluate rock mass brittleness based on stress–strain curves of class I. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:1123–1139

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie HP, Ju Y, Li LY, Peng RD (2008) Energy mechanism of deformation and failure of rock mass. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27(9):1729–1740

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagiz S (2009) Assessment of brittleness using rock strength and density with punch penetration test. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24(1):66–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang SQ, Yin PF, Ranjith PG (2020) Experimental study on mechanical behavior and brittleness characteristics of Longmaxi Formation Shale in Changning, Sichuan Basin, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:2461–2483

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Ranjith PG, Perera MSA (2016) The brittleness indices used in rock mechanics and their application in shale hydraulic fracturing: a review. J Pet Sci Eng 143:158–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Feng XT, Yang CX, Han Q, Wang ZF, Kong R (2021) Evaluation method of rock brittleness under true triaxial stress states based on pre-peak deformation characteristic and post-peak energy evolution. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54:1277–1291

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Chen J, Lu JJ, Jiang Y, Meng FZ (2018) A new rock brittleness evaluation index based on the internal friction angle and class I stress-strain curve. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:2309–2316

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42077244) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Southeast University (Grant No. 2242021R10080, 3205002108C3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengqiang Gong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, F., Wang, Y. A New Rock Brittleness Index Based on the Peak Elastic Strain Energy Consumption Ratio. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55, 1571–1582 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02738-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02738-y

Keywords

Navigation