Abstract
A tunnel driven in loess soil in an earthquake-prone area may be subject to a variety of other external actions. Considering the coupling effect of earthquake activity, rainfall seepage and traffic movement, a dynamic model of a two-lane tunnel driven in a loess soil and a model of rain seepage are established. Using near-field pulse earthquake excitation, the influences of tunnel driven in a loess soil seepage, traffic load and earthquake activity on the dynamic responses of tunnel driven in a loess soil are studied. The variation laws of the first principal stress, the third principal stress, the displacement, the acceleration and the pore water pressure of tunnel driven in a loess soil with different rainfall amounts and burial depths are discussed. Considering the unfavorable conditions of El-Centro ground motion and rainfall seepage, the ground motion response rule of loess tunnel is studied based on the 1/40 shaking table model of loess tunnel. The results show that, at the same burial depth, the stress, displacement and pore water pressure increase with the rainfall amount; for different burial depths, according to the extreme value of the stress, displacement and the pore water pressure, the locations of antiseismic reinforcement measures are determined. The research results can provide a reference for the design and construction of tunnel driven in a loess soils under complex stress coupling.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig17_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00603-020-02291-0/MediaObjects/603_2020_2291_Fig18_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alban K, Mehmet A, Ylber M (2016) Investigation of seepage effect on river dike’s stability under steady state and transient conditions. Pollack Period 11(2):88–104. https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2016.11.2.8
Ali A, Homayoon K, Mostafa S (2012) Application of fuzzy Delphi AHP method for the estimation and classification of Ghomrud tunnel from groundwater flow hazard. Arab J Geosci 5(2):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0172-8
An P, Zhang AJ, Liu HT et al (2013) Degradation mechanism of long-term seepage and permeability analysis of remolded saturated loess. Rock Soil Mech 34(7):1965–1971. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2013.07.034
Cebon D (1993) Interaction between heavy vehicles and roads. SAE Technical Paper 930001. https://doi.org/10.4271/930001.
Chen JY, Liu JY (2006) Fluid–structure coupling analysis of water-conveyance tunnel subjected to seismic excitation. Rock Soil Mech 27(7):1077–1081
Cheng XS, Tian RR, Wang JL et al (2010) Static and seismic stability analysis of soil mass surrounding tunnel about large-span unlined egg-shaped loess tunnel. China Civ Eng J 43(S1):582–587. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2010.s1.011
Cheng XS, Feng H, Qi SR et al (2017) Dynamic response of curved wall LTSLS under the interaction of rainwater seepage and earthquake. Geotech Geol Eng 35(3):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0148-x
Cheng XS, Ma L, Yu DP et al (2018) Seismic stability of loess tunnels under the effects of rain seepage and a train load. Sci China Technol Sci 61(5):735–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9151-2
Darcy H (1856) Les fontaines public public de la ville de Dijon. Dalmont, Paris
Deng XJ (2002) Study on dynamics of vehicle-ground pavement structure system. J Southeast Univ (Natural science edition) 32(3):474–479. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSH0009-4633350347
Fang R, Lu Z, Yao HL et al (2018) Study on dynamic responses of unsaturated railway subgrade subjected to moving train load. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2018(115):319–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.037
Li P, Zhao Y (2016) Performance of a multi-face tunnel excavated in loess ground based on field monitoring and numerical modeling. Arab J Geosci 9(14):640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2668-3
Li J, Shao SJ, Shao S (2019) Collapsible characteristics of loess tunnel site and their effects on tunnel structure. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 2019(83):509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.035
Liu Y, Lai H, Xie Y et al (2016) Cracks analysis of highway tunnel lining in flooded loess. Geotech Eng 2016:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.15.00177
Li PF, Zhao Y, Zhou XJ (2016) Displacement characteristics of high-speed railway tunnel construction in loess ground by using multi-step excavation method. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 51:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.009
Liu JB, Gu Y, Du YX (2006) 3D consistent viscous-spring artificial boundaries and viscous-spring boundary elements. Chin J Geotech Eng 28(9):1070–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-006-0101-1
Liu RS (2009) Seismic response analysis of large span cable-stayed bridge. Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha
Liu ZD (1997) Mechanics and engineering loess. Shaanxi Science and Technology Press, Xian
Pang H, Peng W, Yuan Y (2014) Multi-objective optimization of pneumatic suspension parameters for heavy vehicle under random excitation. J Vib Shock 33(6):156–160. https://doi.org/10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.06.028
Saito J, Niu K, Kishida K et al (2011) Numerical evaluation of the effect of permeability decrease on the undersea tunnel. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng Ser F 67(3):125–132. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejte.67.I_25
Shao ZS, Fan YG, Wang XY (2016) Research into the effect of traffic load on stability of shallow buried loess tunnel. Chin J Appl Mech 33(2):299–305. https://doi.org/10.11776/cjam.33.02.C006
Wang X, Han X, Zhou HL (2014) Study of the numerical calculation of ground response under metro traffic loading in a loess area. Modern Tunnel Technol 51(3):152–160. https://doi.org/10.13807/j.cnki.mtt.2014.03.024
Wang ZY, Liang B (2008) Effect of invert arch on the integral dynamic characteristics of a tunnel under high-speed train loading. Modern Tunnel Technol 45(5):28–33
Wang YH, Pan W, Zhang JR (2015) Seepage law and its extension of porous continuum. J Chifeng Univ (Natural science edition) 31(4):32–34 (in Chinese)
Yang W, Fang ZD, Yang X et al (2018) Experimental study of influence of karst aquifer on the law of water inrush in tunnels. Water 1211(10):1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091211
Yang WB, Li LG, Shang YC et al (2018) An experimental study of the dynamic response of shield tunnels under long-term train loads. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 79(2018):67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.031
Zhang ZH, Zhang XD, Cui YF et al (2019) Discrete element modeling of a cross-river tunnel under subway train operation during peak and off-peak periods. Arab J Geosci 12(3):102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4279-2
Zhao Y, He HW, Li PF (2018) Key techniques for the construction of high-speed railway large-section loess tunnels. Engineering 4(2):254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.07.003
Zheng J, Yu SF (2013) Dynamic responses of underground structures generated by high-speed train loads. Struct Eng 29(2):46–50. https://doi.org/10.15935/j.cnki.jggcs.2013.02.003
Acknowledgements
This paper is a part of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 51478212).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, X., Zhou, X., Liu, H. et al. Numerical Analysis and Shaking Table Test of Seismic Response of Tunnel in a Loess Soil Considering Rainfall and Traffic Load. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 1005–1025 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02291-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02291-0