Abstract
Dilatancy controlled gas flow is characterized by a series of gas pressure-induced dilatant pathways in which the pathway aperture is a function of the effective stress within the solid matrix. In this paper, a three-dimensional hydro-mechanical model is presented to simulate the gas migration in initially saturated claystone with considerable anisotropy. The governing equations including mass conservation, momentum balance and energy conservation are presented for the unsaturated rock containing three phases, i.e., gas, water and solid grain. The constitutive model is proposed in which two conceptualized fracture sets with nonlinear mechanical behavior and cubic law controlled permeability are inserted, which have a direct effect on the hydro-mechanical behavior of the equivalent continuum. Finally, the developed model is validated against three gas injection tests on initially saturated Callovo–Oxfordian claystone. In general, the model is capable of capturing the main features of dilatancy controlled flow, i.e., anisotropic radial deformation, major gas breakthrough, and mechanical volume dilation of the sample. The proposed model offers additional insight into the relation between gas flow, solid matrix deformation and fracture opening/closure, which helps us get in-depth understanding of this gas transport mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a :
-
Fracture spacing
- \(a_{s}\) :
-
Spacing of fracture set \(s\)
- \(A_{k}\),\(n_{k}\) :
-
Fitting parameters related to pore size distribution
- \(b_{hs}\) :
-
Hydraulic aperture of fracture set \(s\)
- \(C_{s}\) :
-
Specific storage coefficient
- \({\mathbb{C}}\) :
-
Equivalent stiffness tensor
- \(D\) :
-
Diameter of the sample
- \(e\) :
-
Internal energy of the mixture
- \(e_{s}\) :
-
Internal energy of the skeleton
- \(e_{\alpha }\) :
-
Internal energy of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \(E\) :
-
Young’s modulus
- \(f_{s}\) :
-
Roughness influence factor of fracture set \(s\)
- \({\mathbf{g}}\) :
-
Gravitational acceleration
- \(G\) :
-
Shear modulus
- \(h_{\alpha }\) :
-
Specific enthalpy of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \({\mathbf{I}}\) :
-
Second-order identity tensor
- \(K_{\text{n}}\) :
-
Normal stiffness of fracture
- \(K_{\text{ni}}\) :
-
Initial normal stiffness of fracture
- \(K_{\text{s}}\) :
-
Bulk modulus of solid grain
- \(K_{\text{fs}}\) :
-
Shear stiffness of fracture
- \(K_{\phi }\) :
-
Unjacketed pore bulk modulus
- \({\mathbf{k}}_{\text{in}}\) :
-
Intrinsic permeability tensor
- \({\mathbf{k}}_{\text{m}}\) :
-
Intrinsic permeability tensor of matrix
- \({\mathbf{k}}_{\text{f}}\) :
-
Intrinsic permeability tensor of fracture
- \(k_{r\alpha }\) :
-
Relative permeability of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \(k_{\text{fs}}\) :
-
Permeability through fracture set \(s\) oriented parallel to the flow direction
- \(k_{\text{ref}}\) :
-
Reference intrinsic permeability
- \(k_{0}\) :
-
Initial intrinsic permeability of sample
- \(L\) :
-
Sample length
- \(m\) :
-
Shape parameter of van Genuchten model
- \(M\) :
-
Molar mass of gas
- \(n\) :
-
Eulerian porosity
- \(n_{\alpha }\) :
-
Volume fraction of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \(\vec{n}\) :
-
Unit vector normal to fracture plane
- \(\vec{n}_{s}\) :
-
Unit vector normal to plane of fracture set \(s\)
- \(N\) :
-
Biot’s skeleton modulus
- \(p_{1}\) :
-
Axial pressure
- \(p_{3}\) :
-
Confining pressure
- \(p_{\alpha }\) :
-
Pressure of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \(p_{c}\) :
-
Capillary pressure
- \(\bar{p}_{f}\) :
-
Averaged pore pressure
- \(p_{\text{gev}}\) :
-
Gas entry value
- \(p_{0}\) :
-
Initial air entry value
- \(p_{\text{ref}}\) :
-
Reference gas entry value
- \(R\) :
-
Universal gas constant
- \(S_{\alpha }\) :
-
Saturation degree of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \(S_{\text{e}}\) :
-
Effective water saturation degree
- \({\mathbb{S}}\) :
-
Equivalent compliance tensor
- \({\mathbb{S}}_{\text{f}}\) :
-
Compliance tensor of fracture
- \({\mathbb{S}}_{m}\) :
-
Compliance tensor of matrix
- \(T\) :
-
Absolute temperature
- \(T_{s}\) :
-
Surface tension on air–water interface
- \({\mathbb{T}}\) :
-
Transformation matrix
- \({\mathbf{u}}\) :
-
Displacement tensor
- \(u_{\text{n}}\) :
-
Mechanical aperture of fracture
- \(u_{\text{ns}}\) :
-
Mechanical aperture of fracture set \(s\)
- \(U\) :
-
Interfacial energy
- \({\mathbf{v}}_{\text{s}}\) :
-
Velocity vector of solid
- \({\mathbf{v}}_{\alpha }\) :
-
Velocity vector of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \({\mathbf{v}}_{{\varvec{\upalpha}}}^{{\mathbf{D}}}\) :
-
Darcy’s velocity of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \(V_{\text{m}}\) :
-
Maximum fracture closure
- \({\varvec{\upalpha}}\) :
-
Biot’s coefficients tensor
- \(\beta\) :
-
Rotation angle between local and global axis
- \(\beta_{m}\) :
-
Rotation angle of bedding plane
- \(\beta_{\text{fs}}\) :
-
Rotation angle of fracture set \(s\)
- \({\varvec{\upvarepsilon}}\) :
-
Total strain tensor
- \(\varepsilon_{v}\) :
-
Volumetric strain
- \({\varvec{\upvarepsilon}}^{*}\) :
-
Local strain tensor
- \(\mu_{\alpha }\) :
-
Dynamic viscosity of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \(\nu\) :
-
Poisson’s ratio
- \(\pi\) :
-
Equivalent pore pressure
- \(\rho\) :
-
Density of the mixture
- \(\rho_{\text{s}}\) :
-
Density of solid skeleton
- \(\rho_{\alpha }\) :
-
Density of fluid \(\alpha\)
- \({\varvec{\upsigma}}\) :
-
Total stress tensor
- \({\varvec{\upsigma}}{\prime }\) :
-
Effective stress tensor
- \(\sigma_{n} {\prime }\) :
-
Stress traction normal to fracture set
- \({\varvec{\upsigma}}^{*}\) :
-
Local stress tensor
- \(\phi\) :
-
Lagrangian porosity
- \(\phi_{\text{ref}}\) :
-
Reference porosity
- \(\chi_{\text{w}}\) :
-
Water compressibility
References
Abdi H, Labrie D, Nguyen TS, Barnichon JD, Su G, Evgin E, Simon R, Fall M (2015) A laboratory investigation on the mechanical behaviour of the Tournemire argillite. Can Geotech J 52(3):268–282
Aichi M, Tokunaga T (2012) Material coefficients of multiphase thermoporoelasticity for anisotropic micro-heterogeneous porous media. Int J Solids Struct 49:3388–3396. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2012.07.011
Alvarez TA, Cording EJ, Mikhail RA (1995) Hydromechanical behavior of rock joints: a re-interpretation of published experiments. In: The 35th US Symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association
Amadei B, Goodman RE (1981) A 3-D constitutive relation for fractured rock masses. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the mechanical behavior of structured media, Ottawa, pp 249–268
Andra (2005) Dossier 2005 Argile: Re´fe´rentiel du site de Meuse/Haute-Marne, Tome 2: Caracte´risation comportementale du milieu ge´ologique sous perturbation
Angeli M, Soldal M, Skurtveit E, Aker E (2009) Experimental percolation of supercritical CO2 through a caprock. Energy Proced 1:3351–3358. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2009.02.123
Arnedo D, Alonso EE, Olivella S (2013) Gas flow in anisotropic claystone: modelling triaxial experiments. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 37:2239–2256. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2132
Asgian M (1989) A numerical model of fluid-flow in deformable naturally fractured rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 26:317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(89)91980-3
Bandis SC, Lumsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 20:249–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(83)90595-8
Belmokhtar M, Delage P, Ghabezloo S et al (2017) Poroelasticity of the Callovo–Oxfordian Claystone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:871–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1137-3
Berre I, Doster F, Keilegavlen E (2018) Flow in fractured porous media: a review of conceptual models and discretization approaches. Transp Porous Media 130:215–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1171-6
Berrone S, Fidelibus C, Pieraccini S et al (2018) Unsteady advection–diffusion simulations in complex discrete fracture networks with an optimization approach. J Hydrol 566:332–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.031
Bertrand F, Cerfontaine B, Collin F (2017) A fully coupled hydro-mechanical model for the modeling of coalbed methane recovery. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 46:307–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.07.029
Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media. Colorado State University, Fort Collins
Bui TA, Wong H, Deleruyelle F et al (2017) A thermodynamically consistent model accounting for viscoplastic creep and anisotropic damage in unsaturated rocks. Int J Solids Struct 117:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.015
Cammarata G, Fidelibus C, Cravero M, Barla G (2007) The hydro-mechanically coupled response of rock fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 40:41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-006-0081-z
Cappa F, Guglielmi Y, Rutqvist J et al (2008) Estimation of fracture flow parameters through numerical analysis of hydromechanical pressure pulses. Water Resour Res 44:W11408. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007015
Carman PC (1937) Fluid flow through granular beds. Trans Inst Chem Eng 15:150–166
Charlier R, Collin F, Pardoen B et al (2013) An unsaturated hydro-mechanical modelling of two in-situ experiments in Callovo–Oxfordian argillite. Eng Geol 165:46–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.05.021
Chasset C, Jarsjö J, Erlström M et al (2011) Scenario simulations of CO2 injection feasibility, plume migration and storage in a saline aquifer, Scania, Sweden. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5:1303–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2011.06.003
Cheng AH-D (1997) Material coefficients of anisotropic poroelasticity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00055-1
Coussy O (2007) Revisiting the constitutive equations of unsaturated porous solids using a Lagrangian saturation concept. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31:1675–1694. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.613
Coussy O (2004) Poromechanics. Wiley, Oxford
Cuss R, Harrington J, Giot R, Auvray C (2014) Experimental observations of mechanical dilation at the onset of gas flow in Callovo–Oxfordian claystone. Geol Soc Spec Publ 400:507–519. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP400.26
Cuss RC, Harrington JF, Noy DJ (2012) Final report of FORGE WP4.1.1: the stress-path permeameter experiment conducted on Callovo–Oxfordian claystone. British Geological Survey Commissioned Report. CR/12/140
Dershowitz WS, Fidelibus C (1999) Derivation of equivalent pipe network analogues for three-dimensional discrete fracture networks by the boundary element method. Water Resour Res 35:2685–2691. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900118
Detournay E (1980) Hydraulic conductivity of closed rock fracture: an experimental and analytical study. In: Can Rock Mech Symp Proc 13th, Underground Rock Eng, The HR Rice Mem Symp
Faivre M, Paul B, Golfier F et al (2016) 2D coupled HM-XFEM modeling with cohesive zone model and applications to fluid-driven fracture network. Eng Fract Mech 159:115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.029
Fall M, Nasir O, Nguyen TS (2014) A coupled hydro-mechanical model for simulation of gas migration in host sedimentary rocks for nuclear waste repositories. Eng Geol 176:24–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.04.003
Fall M, Nasir O, Nguyen TS (2012) Coupled hydro-mechanical modelling of gas migration in Ontario’s sedimentary rocks, potential host rocks for nuclear waste repositories. In: Proceedings of Canadian geotechnical conference—geomanitoba 2012, CD Rom, Winniped, Manitoba, Canada
Fidelibus C (2007) The 2D hydro-mechanically coupled response of a rock mass with fractures via a mixed BEM-FEM technique. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31:1329–1348. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.596
Fu P, Johnson SM, Carrigan CR (2013) An explicitly coupled hydro-geomechanical model for simulating hydraulic fracturing in arbitrary discrete fracture networks. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 37:2278–2300. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2135
Ghaffari HO, Sharifzadeh M, Fall M (2010) Analysis of aperture evolution in a rock joint using a complex network approach. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(1):17–19
Gerard P, Harrington J, Charlier R, Collin F (2014) Modelling of localised gas preferential pathways in claystone. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 67:104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.01.009
Ghabezloo S, Sulem J, Guédon S et al (2008) Poromechanical behaviour of hardened cement paste under isotropic loading. Cem Concr Res 38:1424–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2008.06.007
Gonzalez-Blanco L, Romero E, Jommi C et al (2016) Gas migration in a Cenozoic clay: experimental results and numerical modelling. Geomech Energy Environ 6:81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2016.04.002
Guayacán-Carrillo L-M, Ghabezloo S, Sulem J et al (2017) Effect of anisotropy and hydro-mechanical couplings on pore pressure evolution during tunnel excavation in low-permeability ground. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 97:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.02.016
Guglielmi Y, Elsworth D, Cappa F et al (2015) In situ observations on the coupling between hydraulic diffusivity and displacements during fault reactivation in shales. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:7729–7748. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012158
Guo G, Fall M (2018) Modelling of dilatancy-controlled gas flow in saturated bentonite with double porosity and double effective stress concepts. Eng Geol 243:253–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.002
Guo G, Fall M (2019) Modelling of preferential gas flow in heterogeneous and saturated bentonite based on phase field method. Comput Geotech 116:103206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103206
Harrington JF, Cuss RJ, Talandier J (2017) Gas transport properties through intact and fractured Callovo–Oxfordian mudstones. Geol Soc Spec Publ 454:131–154. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP454.7
Harrington JF, de la Vaissière R, Noy DJ et al (2012a) Gas flow in Callovo–Oxfordian claystone (COx): results from laboratory and field-scale measurements. Mineral Mag 76:3303–3318. https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2012.076.8.43
Harrington JF, Milodowski AE, Graham CC et al (2012b) Evidence for gas-induced pathways in clay using a nanoparticle injection technique. Mineral Mag 76:3327–3336. https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2012.076.8.45
Harrington JF, Noy DJ, Cuss RC (2013) The stress-path permeameter experiment conducted on Callovo–Oxfordian claystone. EU Rep. D
Homand F, Shao J-F, Giraud A et al (2006) Pétrofabrique et propriétés mécaniques des argilites. Comptes Rendus Geosci 338:882–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRTE.2006.03.009
Hu D, Zhou H, Zhang F et al (2013) Modeling of inherent anisotropic behavior of partially saturated clayey rocks. Comput Geotech 48:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.002
Lei Q, Latham J-P, Tsang C-F (2017) The use of discrete fracture networks for modelling coupled geomechanical and hydrological behaviour of fractured rocks. Comput Geotech 85:151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.12.024
Lenti V, Fidelibus C (2003) A BEM solution of steady-state flow problems in discrete fracture networks with minimization of core storage. Comput Geosci 29:1183–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(03)00140-7
Lisjak A, Grasselli G, Vietor T (2014) Continuum–discontinuum analysis of failure mechanisms around unsupported circular excavations in anisotropic clay shales. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 65:96–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.10.006
Lisjak A, Tatone BSA, Mahabadi OK et al (2016) Hybrid finite-discrete element simulation of the EDZ formation and mechanical sealing process around a microtunnel in opalinus clay. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:1849–1873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0847-2
Liu H-H, Rutqvist J, Berryman JG (2009) On the relationship between stress and elastic strain for porous and fractured rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJRMMS.2008.04.005
Liu H-H, Wei M-Y, Rutqvist J (2013) Normal-stress dependence of fracture hydraulic properties including two-phase flow properties. Hydrogeol J 21:371–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-012-0915-6
Loon VLR, Voltolini M, Mazurek M et al (2008) Preferred orientations and anisotropy in shales: Callovo–Oxfordian Shale (France) and opalinus clay (Switzerland). Clays Clay Miner 56:285–306. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2008.0560301
Mahjoub M, Rouabhi A, Tijani M et al (2018) Numerical study of Callovo–Oxfordian argillite expansion due to gas injection. Int J Geomech 18:04017134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001050
Marschall P, Gimmi T, Horseman S (2005) Characterisation of gas transport properties of the opalinus clay, a potential host rock formation for radioactive waste disposal. Oil Gas Sci Technol 60:121–139. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2005008
Martinez MJ, Newell P, Bishop JE, Turner DZ (2013) Coupled multiphase flow and geomechanics model for analysis of joint reactivation during CO2 sequestration operations. Int J Greenh Gas Control 17:148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.008
Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513
Munjiza A, Latham JP, Andrews KRF (2000) Detonation gas model for combined finite-discrete element simulation of fracture and fragmentation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 49:1495–1520. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0207(20001230)49:12<1495:AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-5
NAGRA (2008) Effects of post-disposal gas generation in a repository for low- and intermediate-level waste sited in the Opalinus Clay of Northern Switzerland. NAGRA Tech. Rep. 08-07, Wettingen
Nasir O, Fall M, Nguyen S, Evgin E (2011) Modeling of the hydro-mechanical response of sedimentary rocks of Southern Ontario to past glaciations. Eng Geol 123(4):271–287
Nasir O, Fall M, Nguyen S, Evgin E (2013) Modeling of the thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical response of sedimentary rocks of Ontario to past glaciations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 64:160–174
Nasir O, Fall M, Evgin E (2014) A simulator for modeling of porosity and permeability changes in near field sedimentary host rocks under climate changes influences. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 42:122–135
Nasir O, Fall M, Nguyen S, Evgin E (2015) Modeling of the thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical response of Ontario sedimentary rocks to future glaciations. Can Geotech J 52(7):836–850
Nguyen TS, Le AD (2015) Simultaneous gas and water flow in a damage-susceptible bedded argillaceous rock. Can Geotech J 52:18–32. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0457
Olivella S, Alonso EE (2008) Gas flow through clay barriers. Géotechnique 58:157–176. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.3.157
Paluszny A, Salimzadeh S, Zimmerman RW (2018) Finite-element modeling of the growth and interaction of hydraulic fractures in poroelastic rock formations. Hydraul Fract Model. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812998-2.00001-1
Pardoen B, Seyedi DM, Collin F (2015) Shear banding modelling in cross-anisotropic rocks. Int J Solids Struct 72:63–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.07.012
Pazdniakou A, Dymitrowska M (2018) Migration of gas in water saturated clays by coupled hydraulic-mechanical model. Geofluids 2018:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6873298
Popp T, Wiedemann M, Böhnel H et al (2007) Untersuchungen zur Barriereintegrität im Hinblick auf das Ein-Endlager-Konzept. Insitut fur Gebirgsmechanik GmbH, Leipzig
Pouya A, Vo TD, Hemmati S, Tang AM (2019) Modeling soil desiccation cracking by analytical and numerical approaches. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 43:738–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2887
Rozhko AY (2016) Two-phase fluid-flow modeling in a dilatant crack-like pathway. J Pet Sci Eng 146:1158–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.08.018
Salimzadeh S, Khalili N (2015) A three-phase XFEM model for hydraulic fracturing with cohesive crack propagation. Comput Geotech 69:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.05.001
Segura JM, Carol I (2010) Numerical modelling of pressurized fracture evolution in concrete using zero-thickness interface elements. Eng Fract Mech 77:1386–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.014
Senger R, Romero E, Ferrari A, Marschall P (2014) Characterization of gas flow through low-permeability claystone: laboratory experiments and two-phase flow analyses. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 400:531–543. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP400.15
Senger R, Romero E, Marschall P (2018) Modeling of Gas migration through low-permeability clay rock using information on pressure and deformation from fast air injection tests. Transp Porous Media 123:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-017-0962-5
Shaw RPP (2015) The fate of repository gases (FORGE) project. Geol Soc Spec Publ 415:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP415.17
Skurtveit E, Aker E, Soldal M et al (2012) Experimental investigation of CO2 breakthrough and flow mechanisms in shale. Pet Geosci 18:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079311-016
Souley M, Homand F, Amadei B (1995) An extension to the Saeb and Amadei constitutive model for rock joints to include cyclic loading paths. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(94)00039-6
Sun Z, Zhang X, Xu Y et al (2017) Numerical simulation of the heat extraction in EGS with thermal-hydraulic-mechanical coupling method based on discrete fractures model. Energy 120:20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.046
van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
Vo TD, Pouya A, Hemmati S, Tang AM (2017) Numerical modelling of desiccation cracking of clayey soil using a cohesive fracture method. Comput Geotech 85:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.12.010
Vyazmensky A, Stead D, Elmo D, Moss A (2010) Numerical analysis of block caving-induced instability in large open pit slopes: a finite element/discrete element approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0035-3
Wang H (2016) Numerical investigation of fracture spacing and sequencing effects on multiple hydraulic fracture interference and coalescence in brittle and ductile reservoir rocks. Eng Fract Mech 157:107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2016.02.025
Wiseall AC, Cuss RJ, Graham CC, Harrington JF (2015) The visualization of flow paths in experimental studies of clay-rich materials. Mineral Mag 79:1335–1342. https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2015.079.06.09
Witherspoon PA, Wang JSY, Iwai K, Gale JE (1980) Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res 16:1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i006p01016
Xu C, Fidelibus C, Dowd P et al (2018) An iterative procedure for the simulation of the steady-state fluid flow in rock fracture networks. Eng Geol 242:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.06.005
Xu WJ, Shao H, Hesser J et al (2013) Coupled multiphase flow and elasto-plastic modelling of in-situ gas injection experiments in saturated claystone (Mont Terri Rock Laboratory). Eng Geol 157:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.02.005
Yang JP, Chen WZ, Wu GJ, Yang DS (2018) Analytical estimation of the equivalent elastic compliance tensor for fractured rock masses. Int J Geomech 18:04017126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001035
Yang JP, Chen WZ, Yang DS, Tian HM (2016) Estimation of elastic moduli of non-persistent fractured rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:1977–1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0806-y
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from a joint program supported by the China Scholarship Council and University of Ottawa. Moreover, the authors thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for financially supporting this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, J., Fall, M. & Guo, G. A Three-Dimensional Hydro-mechanical Model for Simulation of Dilatancy Controlled Gas Flow in Anisotropic Claystone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53, 4091–4116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02152-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02152-w