Skip to main content
Log in

The incidence and outcome of pelvic sepsis following handsewn and stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incidence and outcome of pelvic sepsis was analyzed in 210 patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) in 197 patients, and for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in 13 patients. Pelvic sepsis developed in 18 patients (8.6%) and a significantly higher incidence was seen in men than in women, at 13.6% vs 3.7%, respectively (P < 0.05). The incidence of pelvic sepsis in patients with UC complicated by toxic megacolon and/or fulminant colitis was significantly higher that in those without any preoperative complications, at 36.4% vs 7.4% (P < 0.05). The incidence of pelvic sepsis following handsewn anastomosis was significantly higher than that following stapled anastomosis, at 15.6% vs 5.5% (P < 0.05). The outcome of pelvic sepsis in patients with a stapled anastomosis was better than that in those with a handsewn anastomosis. The prognosis of women who developed pelvic sepsis was better than that of men who developed pelvic sepsis. The risk factors predisposing to pelvic sepsis were UC, especially when complicated by toxic megacolon and/or fulminant colitis, and male sex, while a handsewn anastomosis was more vulnerable than a stapled anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Truelove SC, Witts LJ (1955) Cortisone in ulcerative colitis. Final report on a therapeutic trial. Br Med J 2:1041–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleshman JW, Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stern H, Blair J (1988) The ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure. Factors affecting technical and functional outcome. Dis Col Rectum 31:10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fonkalsrud EW (1987) Update on clinical experience with different surgical techniques of the endorectal pull-through operation for colitis and polyposis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165:309–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly KA (1992) Anal sphincter saving operations for chronic ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg 163:5–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ(1987) Restorative proctocolectomy, The four loop(w) reservoir. Br J Surg 74:564–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC (1988) Can the pouch be saved? Dis Col Rectum 31:671–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wexner SD, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA (1990) The ileoanal reservoir. Am J Surg 159:178–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goligher J, Duthie H, Nixon H (1984) Fistula in ano 178–220, surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Bailliere Tindall, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ziv Y, Fazio VW, Church JM, Lavery IC, King TM, Ambrosetti P (1996) Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg 171:320–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Luukkonen P, Jarvinen H (1993) Stapled versus hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy. Arch Surg 128:437–440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Nivatvongs S, Devine RM, Litchy WL, McIntyre PB (1997) Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann Surg 225:666–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleshman JW, Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stern H, Blair J (1988) The ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure factors affecting technical and functional outcome. Dis Col Rectum 31:10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ziv Y, Fazio VW, Church JM, Milson JW, Schroeder TK (1995) Safety of urgent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouchanal anastomosis for fulminant colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 38:345–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ziv Y, Church JM, Fazio VW, King TM, Lavery IC (1996) Effect of systemic steroids on ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dis Col Rectum 39:504–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fukushima, T., Sugita, A., Koganei, K. et al. The incidence and outcome of pelvic sepsis following handsewn and stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses. Surg Today 30, 223–227 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950050049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950050049

Key Words

Navigation