Skip to main content
Log in

Can the pouch be saved?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

From 1980 to 1986, 165 patients underwent ileal reservoir procedures at the Lahey Clinic Medical Center; 142 (86 percent) had J-shaped pouches constructed, and 23 (14 percent) had S-shaped pouches constructed. In this series, 42 complications specifically related to the pouch occurred in 36 patients. Stricture was most common, followed by separation of the ileoanal anastomosis, pelvic sepsis, complex fistula, and a leaking pouch. Through judicious application of remedial operations and either delay in closure of the ileostomy or establishment of proximal loop ileostomy, only seven patients required reestablishment of fecal diversion. The authors urge aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic efforts to save the pouch and maintain satisfactory function in most patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Ileoanal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Arch Surg 1986;121:404–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Beart RW Jr, Wolff BG. Ileal “J” pouch-anal anastomosis: clinical outcome. Ann Surg 1985;202:735–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stern H, Grant D, Nordgren S. The pelvic pouch and ileoanal anastomosis procedure: surgical technique and initial results. Am J Surg 1985;150:601–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Ileoanal pouch procedures. Curr Probl Surg 1985;22:1–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 1985;72:470–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nasmyth DG, Williams NS, Johnston D. Comparison of the function of triplicated and duplicated pelvic ileal reservoirs after mucosal proctectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 1986;73:361–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnstein M, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Technique of mesenteric lengthening and ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:863–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pezim ME, Nicholls RJ. Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1985;72:31–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballantyne GH, Pemberton JH, Beart RW Jr, Wolff BG, Dozois RR. Ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis: current technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:197–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith L, Friend WG, Medwell SJ. The superior mesenteric artery: the critical factor in the pouch pull-through procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:741–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindquist K, Nilsell K, Liljeqvist L. Cuff abscesses and ileoanal anastomotic separations in pelvic pouch surgery: an analysis of possible etiologic factors. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:355–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Washington, D.C., April 5 to 10, 1987. This paper received the Piedmont Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Award.

About this article

Cite this article

Schoetz, D.J., Coller, J.A. & Veidenheimer, M.C. Can the pouch be saved?. Dis Colon Rectum 31, 671–675 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552580

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552580

Key words

Navigation