Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wound infection after a laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the wound infection (WI) rate in laparoscopic surgery (LS) for colorectal cancer is lower than that in open surgery (OS), and to evaluate the influence of perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of WI in LS.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis study comparing the WI rate in patients who underwent either OS or LS in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a relatively large number of registered patients. Moreover, a subgroup analysis of recently reported RCTs from Japan was performed, and 290 consecutive patients who underwent LS for colorectal cancer at our institution were evaluated for the influence of perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of WI.

Results

The WI rate of the LS group was significantly lower than that of the OS group in a meta-analysis; however, no positive effect of the intra-and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of WI was demonstrated.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is considered a surgical technique that has a lower incidence of WI in comparison to OS. Well-designed prospective, randomized controlled trials should therefore be conducted to evaluate whether intraoperative repeated dosing or postoperative repeated dosing is effective in reducing WI in LS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slim K, Vicaut E, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of colorectal surgery with or without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg 2004;91:1125–1130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, Friel CM, Barclay MM, Sawyer RG, et al. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 2004;239:599–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sørensen LT, Hemmingsen U, Kallehave F, Wille-Jørgensen P, Kjaergaard J, Møller LN, et al. Risk factors for tissue and wound complications in gastrointestinal surgery. Ann Surg 2005;241:654–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morita S, Nishisho I, Nomura T, Fukushima Y, Morimoto T, Hiraoka N, et al. The significance of the intraoperative repeated dosing of antimicrobials for preventing surgical wound infection in colorectal surgery. Surg Today 2005;35:732–738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–2059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Piqué JM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–2229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2004;363:1187–1192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vignali A, Braga M, Zuliani W, Frasson M, Radaelli G, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery modifies risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1686–1693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, et al; MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718–1726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:464–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, et al. Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1211–1215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Jeng YM. Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:109–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang CL, Eu KW, Tai BC, Soh JG, MacHin D, Seow-Choen F. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001;88:801–807.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Delgado S, Lacy AM, Filella X, Castells A, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Pique JM, et al. Acute phase response in laparoscopic and open colectomy in colon cancer: randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:638–646.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:1111–1124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:652–656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:413–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujita S, Saito N, Yamada T, Takii Y, Kondo K, Ohue M, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery: single-dose vs. three doses of second-generation cephalosporin without metronidazole and oral antibiotics. Arch Surg 2007;142:657–661.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Ishiguro S, Kobayashi Y, Moriya Y. Wound infection after elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2007;21:2248–2252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Moriya Y. Safety of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectal transection with double-stapling technique anastomosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005;15:70–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Uehara K, Moriya Y. Reduction of prolonged postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1467–1472.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamamoto, S., Fujita, S., Ishiguro, S. et al. Wound infection after a laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Surg Today 38, 618–622 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3684-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3684-4

Key words

Navigation