Skip to main content
Log in

Bile Duct Injuries Associated with Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy: An 11-Year Experience in One Institute

  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Bile duct injury (BDI) represents the most serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The aim of this retrospective single-institution study was to evaluate the real incidence of BDI during laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy (OC) in a tertiary academic center in Athens, Greece.

Methods

Between January 1991 and December 2001, 3 637 patients underwent cholecystectomy in our department; as LC in 2 079 patients (LC group) and as OC in 1 558 patients (OC group). All the LCs were performed or supervised by five staff surgeons and all the OCs were performed or supervised by another five staff surgeons.

Results

There were 13 BDIs associated with LC (0.62%) and 6 associated with OC (0.38%) (P = 0.317). There was one death associated with BDI after LC. Only two (15.4%) of the BDIs associated with LC occurred within the proposed learning curve limit of 50 LCs per individual surgeon.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and is not associated with a higher incidence of BDI than OC. Moreover, we did not find that the learning curve for LC affected BDI occurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CM Ferguson DW Rattner AL Warshaw (1992) ArticleTitleBile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Laparosc Endosc 2 1–7 Occurrence Handle1341493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DJ Deziel KW Millikan SG Ekonomou A Doolas K Sung-Tao MC Airan (1993) ArticleTitleComplications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4 292 hospitals and an analysis of 77 604 cases Am J Surg 165 9–14 Occurrence Handle8418705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MC Richardson X Bell GM Fullerton (1996) ArticleTitleIncidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5 913 cases Br J Surg 83 1356–60 Occurrence Handle8944450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. S Adamsen OH Hausen P Funch-Jensen S Shulze JG Stage P Wara (1997) ArticleTitleBile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series J Am Coll Surg 184 571–8 Occurrence Handle9179112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. InstitutionalAuthorNameThe Southern Surgeons Club (1991) ArticleTitleA prospective analysis of 1 518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies N Engl J Med 324 1073–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. HA Graves JF Ballinger WJ Anderson (1991) ArticleTitleAppraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Ann Surg 213 655–64 Occurrence Handle1828140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NJ Soper PT Stockman DL Dunnegan (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy, the new “gold standard” Arch Surg 127 917–23 Occurrence Handle1386505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. BD Schirmer SB Edge J Dix MJ Hyser JB Hanks RS Jones (1991) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis Ann Surg 213 665–77 Occurrence Handle1828141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MacFayden BV JR R Vecchio AF Richardo CR Mathis (1998) ArticleTitleBile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 12 315–21 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900661 Occurrence Handle9543520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. FG Moody (2000) ArticleTitleBile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 14 604–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams LF JR WC Chapman RT Bonan (1993) ArticleTitleComparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center Am J Surg 165 459–65 Occurrence Handle8480882

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MA Yerdel K Karayalcin A Koyuncu B Akin C Koksoy AG Turkcapar et al. (1999) ArticleTitleDirect trocar insertion versus Veress needle insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 177 247–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00020-3 Occurrence Handle10219864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. F Zaraca M Catarci F Gossetti G Mulieri M Carboni (1999) ArticleTitleRoutine use of open laparoscopy: 1 006 consecutive cases J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9 75–80 Occurrence Handle10194697

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. H Bismuth (1982) Postoperative strictures of the bile duct LH Blumgart (Eds) The biliary tract. Clinical surgery international, vol. 5 Churchill-Livingstone Edinburgh 209–18

    Google Scholar 

  15. MJ Moore Benett ChL (1995) ArticleTitleThe learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club Am J Surg 170 55–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80252-9 Occurrence Handle7793496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D Vanderpool BW Lane JW Winter (1989) ArticleTitleBone GE. Cholecystectomy South Med J 82 450–2 Occurrence Handle2705071

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JB Ganey PA Johnson SuffixJr PE Prillaman GR Mc Swain (1986) ArticleTitleCholecystectomy: clinical experience with a large series Am J Surg 151 352–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(86)90466-6 Occurrence Handle3513652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. U Herzog LC Messmer M Sutter P Tondelli (1992) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment for cholelithiasis Surg Gynecol Obstet 175 238–42 Occurrence Handle1514158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. PA Clavien JR Sanabria G Mentha F Borst L Buchler B Roche et al. (1992) ArticleTitleRecent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors Ann Surg 216 618–26 Occurrence Handle1466614

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. L Morgenstern L Wong G Berci (1992) ArticleTitleTwelve hundred open cholocystectomies before the laparoscopic era. A standard for comparison Arch Surg 127 400–3 Occurrence Handle1532709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. JJ Roslyn GS Binns EFX Hughes K Saunders-Kirkwood MJ Zinner JA Gates (1993) ArticleTitleOpen cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42 474 patients Ann Surg 218 129–37 Occurrence Handle8342992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. R Kozarek R Gannan R Baerg J Wagonfeld T Ball (1992) ArticleTitleBile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of ERCP Arch Intern Med 152 1040–3 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archinte.152.5.1040 Occurrence Handle1533759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. M Airan M Appel J Berci AJ Coburg M Cohen A Cushieri et al. (1992) ArticleTitleRetrospective and prospective analysis multi-institutional laparoscopic cholecystectomy study organized by the society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons Surg Endosc 6 169–76 Occurrence Handle1387733

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. IMC Macintyre RG Wilson (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Surg 80 52–9

    Google Scholar 

  25. A Cushieri F Dubois J Mouiel P Mouret H Becker G Buess et al. (1991) ArticleTitleThe European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 161 385–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-B Occurrence Handle1825763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DE Litwin MJ Girroti EC Poulin J Mamazza AG Nagy (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: trans-Canada experience with 2 201 cases Can J Surg 35 291–6 Occurrence Handle1535548

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. J Cocks W Johnson R Cade B Collopy H Ewing J Rogerson et al. (1993) ArticleTitleBile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of the Standards Subcommittee of the Victorian State Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Aust N Z J Surg 63 682–3 Occurrence Handle8363476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. T Kimura K Kimura K Suzuki S Sakai Y Ohtomo S Sakuramachi et al. (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Japanese experience Surg Laparosc Endosc 3 194–8 Occurrence Handle8111556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. PMNYH Go F Schol DJ Gouma (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Netherlands Br J Surg 80 1180–3 Occurrence Handle8402127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. E Trondsen TE Ruud H Nilsen R Marvik HE Myrvold T Buanes et al. (1994) ArticleTitleComplications during the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Norway. A prospective multicentre study in seven hospitals Eur J Surg 160 145–51 Occurrence Handle8003567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. MC Richardson X Bell GM Fullerton (1996) ArticleTitleIncidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5 913 cases Br J Surg 83 1356–60 Occurrence Handle8944450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. R Vecchio BV MacFayden S Latteri (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of 114 005 cases of United States series Int Surg 83 215–9 Occurrence Handle9870777

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. A Csendes J Yarmuch M Fernandez (1998) ArticleTitlePrevalence of common bile duct lesions during laparoscopic cholcystectomy Rev Chil Cir 52 249–53

    Google Scholar 

  34. AM Davidoff TN Pappas EA Murray DJ Hilleren RD Johnson ME Baker et al. (1992) ArticleTitleMechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Ann Surg 215 196–202 Occurrence Handle1531913

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. M Suzuki S Akaishi T Rikiwama T Naitoh MM Rahman S Matsumo (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy, Calot’s triangle, and variations in cystic arterial supply Surg Endosc 14 141–4 Occurrence Handle10656947

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. D Berrgamachi C Ignjatovic (2000) ArticleTitleMore than two structures in Calot’s triangle Surg Endosc 14 354–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000154 Occurrence Handle10790554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. K Z’graggen H Wehrli A Metzger M Buehler E Frei C Klaiber (1998) ArticleTitleComplications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland: a prospective 3-year study of 10 174 patients Surg Endosc 12 1303–10 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900846 Occurrence Handle9788852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. J Calvete L Sabater B Camps A Verdu A Gomez-Portilla J Martin et al. (2000) ArticleTitleBile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Myth or reality of the learning curve? Surg Endosc 14 608–11 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000103 Occurrence Handle10948294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. HJ Asbun RL Rossi JA Lowell JL Munson (1993) ArticleTitleBile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism of injury, prevention and management World J Surg 17 547–52 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01655122 Occurrence Handle8362534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. JM Sackier G Berci E Phillips B Carroll S Shapiro M Paz Partlow (1991) ArticleTitleThe role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy Arch Surg 126 1021–5 Occurrence Handle1830737

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. JG Hunter (1991) ArticleTitleAvoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 162 71–6 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90207-T Occurrence Handle1829588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. DG Clair DL Carr-Locke JM Becker DC Brooks (1993) ArticleTitleRoutine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Arch Surg 128 551–5 Occurrence Handle8489389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. JL Flowers KA Zucker SM Graham WA Scovill AL Imbembo RW Bailey (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholangiography: results and indications Ann Surg 215 209–16 Occurrence Handle1531915

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. F Dubois G Berthelot H Levard (1991) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: historic perspective and personal experience Surg Laparosc Endosc 1 52–7 Occurrence Handle1669378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. L Krahenbuhl G Sclabas M Wente M Schafer R Schlumpf M Buchler (2001) ArticleTitleincidence, risk factors and prevention of biliary tract injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland World J Surg 25 1325–30 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-001-0118-0 Occurrence Handle11596898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diamantis, T., Tsigris, C., Kiriakopoulos, A. et al. Bile Duct Injuries Associated with Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy: An 11-Year Experience in One Institute. Surg Today 35, 841–845 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-005-3038-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-005-3038-z

Key words

Navigation