Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy, safety, and user experience of DIY or open-source artificial pancreas systems: a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system (DIYAPS) is a patient-driven initiative with the potential to revolutionise diabetes management, automating insulin delivery with existing pumps and CGM combined with open-source algorithms. Given the considerable interest in this topic within the diabetes community, we have conducted a systematic review of DIYAPS efficacy, safety, and user experience. Following recognised procedures and reporting standards, we identified 10 eligible publications of 730 participants within the peer-reviewed literature. Overall, studies reported improvements in time in range, HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin), reduced hypoglycaemia, and improved quality of life with DIYAPS use. While results were positive, the identified studies were small, and the majority were observational and at high risk of bias. Further research including well-designed randomised trials comparing DIYAPS with appropriate comparators is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. OpenAPS Outcomes [Available from: https://openaps.org/outcomes/.

  2. FDA approves first automated insulin delivery device for type 1 diabetes (2016) [Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-automated-insulin-delivery-device-type-1-diabetes.

  3. Certain Medtronic MiniMed Insulin Pumps Have Potential Cybersecurity Risks: FDA Safety Communication. FDA2019 (2019) [Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/certain-medtronic-minimed-insulin-pumps-have-potential-cybersecurity-risks-fda-safety-communication.

  4. Position statement: people with type 1 diabetes and do it yourself (DIY) technology solutions. Diabetes Australia2018 (2018)[Available from: https://static.diabetesaustralia.com.au/s/fileassets/diabetes-australia/ee67e929-5ffc-411f-b286-1ca69e181d1a.pdf.

  5. Tandem Diabetes Care Announces FDA Clearance of the t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Technology (2019) [Available from: https://investor.tandemdiabetes.com/news-releases/news-release-details/tandem-diabetes-care-announces-fda-clearance-tslim-x2-insulin.

  6. JDRF’s UK Position Statement on type 1 diabetes ‘DIY’ technologies (2019) [Available from: https://jdrf.org.uk/about-us/position-statements-reports/position-statements/jdrfs-uk-position-statement-on-type-1-diabetes-diy-technologies/.

  7. Asarani NAM, Reynolds AN, Boucher SE, de Bock M, Wheeler BJ (2020) Cutaneous complications with continuous or flash glucose monitoring use: systematic review of trials and observational studies. J Diabet Sci Technol 14(2):328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barnard KD, Hood KK, Weissberg-Benchell J, Aldred C, Oliver N, Laffel L (2015) Psychosocial assessment of artificial pancreas (AP): commentary and review of existing measures and their applicability in AP research. Diabet Technol Ther 17(4):295–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnard KD, Wysocki T, Ully V, Mader JK, Pieber TR, Thabit H et al (2017) Closing the loop in adults, children and adolescents with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes under free living conditions: a psychosocial substudy. J Diabet Sci Technol 11(6):1080–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnard KD, Ziegler R, Klonoff DC, Braune K, Petersen B, Rendschmidt T et al (2018) Open source closed-loop insulin delivery systems: a clash of cultures or merging of diverse approaches? J Diabet Sci Technol 12(6):1223–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bequette BW (2019) Human-in-the-loop insulin dosing. J Diabet Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819891177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Biester T, Kordonouri O (2019) Pädiatrie-Motor der technologischen Weiterentwicklung in der Diabetologie. Der Diabetologe 15(5):408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biester T, Kordonouri O, Danne T. Therapieansätze in der Kinderdiabetologie–heute/künftig.

  14. Boughton CK, Hovorka R (2019) Advances in artificial pancreas systems. J Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw4949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Braune K, O’Donnel S, Cleal B, Lewis DM, Tappe A, Hauck B et al (2019) 117-LB: DIWHY: factors influencing motivation, barriers, and duration of diy artificial pancreas system use among real-world users. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/db19-117-LB

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Braune K, May A, Thurm U (2019) Safe and successful completion of a half marathon by an adult with type 1 diabetes using a personalized open source artificial pancreas system. J Diabet Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819884922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Braune K, O’Donnell S, Cleal B, Lewis D, Tappe A, Willaing I et al (2019) Real-world use of do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: online survey and analysis of self-reported clinical outcomes. JMIR MHealth and UHealth 7(7):e14087

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown S, Raghinaru D, Emory E, Kovatchev B (2018) First look at Control-IQ: a new-generation automated insulin delivery system. Diabetes Care 41(12):2634–2636

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D, Lum JW, Buckingham BA, Kudva YC et al (2019) Six-month randomized, multicenter trial of closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 381(18):1707–1717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Burnside M, Lewis D, Crocket H, Wilson R, Williman J, Jefferies C et al (2020) CREATE (Community deRivEd AutomaTEd insulin delivery) trial. Randomised parallel arm open label clinical trial comparing automated insulin delivery using a mobile controller (AnyDANA-loop) with an open-source algorithm with sensor augmented pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. J Diabet Metab Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-020-00547-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Burnside M, Crocket H, Mayo M, Pickering J, Tappe A, de Bock M (2019) Do it yourself automated insulin delivery: a leading example of the democratization of medicine. J Diabet Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819890623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Crabtree TS, McLay A, Wilmot EG (2019) DIY artificial pancreas systems: here to stay? Pract Diabet 36(2):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Crocket H (2019) Peer mentoring in the do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system community. J Diabet Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819883876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ekhlaspour L, Tabatabai I, Buckingham B (2019) A review of continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation in the age of automated insulin delivery. J Diabet Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819851790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farrington C (2017) Hacking diabetes: DIY artificial pancreas systems. Lancet Diabet Endocrinol 5(5):332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Farrington C (2018) Psychosocial impacts of hybrid closed-loop systems in the management of diabetes: a review. Diabet Med 35(4):436–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Feige T (2018) Do-it-yourself Artificial Pancreas-Technologiehype oder realer Nutzen? Der Diabetologe 14(7):465–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Forlenza GP, Ekhlaspour L, Breton M, Maahs DM, Wadwa RP, DeBoer M et al (2019) Successful at-home use of the Tandem Control-IQ artificial pancreas system in young children during a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Technol Ther 21(4):159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gawrecki A, Klupa T, Araszkiewicz A, Matejko B, Szadkowska A, Wolnik B et al (2019) Utilization of do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes: a position statement of the Pump School Education Initiative by Diabetes Poland. Pol Arch Intern Med 129(2):937–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Heinemann L, Lange K (2019) “Do it yourself”(DIY)—automated insulin delivery (AID) systems: current status from a german point of view. J Diabet Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819889641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hernando ME, García-Sáez G, Gómez EJ, Pérez-Gandía C, Rodríguez-Herrero A (2020) Automated insulin delivery: the artificial pancreas technical challenges. Am J Ther 27(1):e62–e70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hng T-M, Burren D (2018) Appearance of do-it-yourself closed-loop systems to manage type 1 diabetes. Intern Med J 48(11):1400–1404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hng T-M (2019) Do-it-yourself (DIY) closed loop systems: perspectives of an endocrinologist. J Diabet Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819890855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Holstein A, Bolli B (2019) Normoglycaemic control with a selfmade fully closed-loop insulin delivery system during emergency surgery: an extemporaneous stress test. Acta Diabetol 56(7):807–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jennings P, Hussain S (2019) Do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems: a review of the emerging evidence and insights for healthcare professionals. J Diabet Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819894296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kerr D, Axelrod C, Hoppe C (2017) Patient inputs for mobile health systems for type 1 diabetes care. Diabet Technol Ther 19(4):201–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Klonoff DC (2015) Cybersecurity for connected diabetes devices. J Diabet Sci Technol 9(5):1143–1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kropff J, Del Favero S, Place J, Toffanin C, Visentin R, Monaro M et al (2015) 2 month evening and night closed-loop glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes under free-living conditions: a randomised crossover trial. Lancet Diabet Endocrinol 3(12):939–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Leelarathna L, Dellweg S, Mader JK, Allen JM, Benesch C, Doll W et al (2014) Day and night home closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes: three-center randomized crossover study. Diabet Care 37(7):1931–1937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lewis D (2019) History and perspective on DIY closed looping. J Diabet Sci Technol 13(4):790–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lewis D, Leibrand S (2016) OpenAPS Community Real-world use of open source artificial pancreas systems. J Diabet Sci Technol 10(6):1411–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Litchman ML, Lewis D, Kelly LA, Gee PM (2019) Twitter analysis of# OpenAPS DIY artificial pancreas technology use suggests improved A1C and quality of life. J Diabet Sci Technol 13(2):164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Marshall DC, Holloway M, Korer M, Woodman J, Brackenridge A, Hussain S (2019) Do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems in type 1 diabetes: perspectives of two adult users, a caregiver and three physicians. Diabet Ther 10(5):1553–1564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Melmer A, Züger T, Lewis DM, Leibrand S, Stettler C, Laimer M (2019) Glycaemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes using an open source artificial pancreas system (OpenAPS). Diabet Obes Metab 21(10):2333–2337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISM statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Murray JA, Clayton MF, Litchman ML (2019) Health care provider knowledge and perceptions of FDA-approved and do-it-yourself automated insulin delivery. J Diabet Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819895567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nimri R, Muller I, Atlas E, Miller S, Kordonouri O, Bratina N et al (2014) Night glucose control with MD-Logic artificial pancreas in home setting: a single blind, randomized crossover trial—interim analysis. Pediatr Diabet 15(2):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nimri R, Muller I, Atlas E, Miller S, Fogel A, Bratina N et al (2014) MD-Logic overnight control for 6 weeks of home use in patients with type 1 diabetes: randomized crossover trial. Diabet Care 37(11):3025–3032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Nimri R, Bratina N, Kordonouri O, Avbelj Stefanija M, Fath M, Biester T et al (2017) MD-Logic overnight type 1 diabetes control in home settings: a multicentre, multinational, single blind randomized trial. Diabet Obes Metab 19(4):553–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nimri R, Nir J, Phillip M (2020) Insulin Pump Therapy. Am J Ther 27(1):e30–e41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Oliver N, Reddy M, Marriott C, Walker T, Heinemann L (2019) Open source automated insulin delivery: addressing the challenge. NPJ Digit Med 2(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Omer T (2016) Empowered citizen ‘health hackers’ who are not waiting. BMC Med 14(1):118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Petruzelkova L, Soupal J, Plasova V, Jiranova P, Neuman V, Plachy L et al (2018) Excellent glycemic control maintained by open-source hybrid closed-loop AndroidAPS during and after sustained physical activity. Diabet Technol Ther 20(11):744–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Kyaw AM (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glucose control in diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr 5(1):39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Posford G (2018) New technologies in type 1 diabetes: Hope or hype? Br J Healthc Manag 24(3):110–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Rodbard D (2017) Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of recent studies demonstrating improved glycemic outcomes. Diabet Technol Ther 19(S3):S-25-S-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Shaw D, Hammond P, McLay A, Wilmot E (2020) The DIY artificial pancreas system: an ethical dilemma for doctors. Diabet Med. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Leelarathna L, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME et al (2015) Home use of an artificial beta cell in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 373(22):2129–2140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Toffanin C, Kozak M, Sumnik Z, Cobelli C, Petruzelkova L (2020) In Silico trials of an open-source android-based artificial pancreas: a new paradigm to test safety and efficacy of do-it-yourself systems. Diabet Technol Ther 22(2):112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wicks P (2018) Patient, study thyself. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1216-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Wilmot EG, Danne T (2020) DIY artificial pancreas systems: the clinician perspective. Lancet Diabet Endocrinol 8(3):183–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Department of Women’s and Children’s Health and the Department of Medicine, University of Otago.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BW, NA, and AR conceived the study. All authors were involved in study design. AR and NA were involved in screening of included studies. NA and ME performed data extraction and analysis. NA drafted the initial manuscript, and this has been reviewed and revised by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. J. Wheeler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data availability and material

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Managed by Massimo Porta.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 65 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asarani, N.A.M., Reynolds, A.N., Elbalshy, M. et al. Efficacy, safety, and user experience of DIY or open-source artificial pancreas systems: a systematic review. Acta Diabetol 58, 539–547 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01623-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01623-4

Keywords

Navigation