Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT-guided infiltration saves surgical intervention and fastens return to work compared to anatomical landmark-guided infiltration in patients with lumbosciatica

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Infiltration procedures are a common treatment of lumbar radiculopathy. There is a wide variety of infiltration techniques without an established gold standard. Therefore, we compared the effectiveness of CT-guided transforaminal infiltrations versus anatomical landmark-guided transforaminal infiltrations at the lower lumbar spine in case of acute sciatica at L3–L5.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 107 outpatients treated between 2009 and 2011. All patients were diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathic pain secondary to disc herniation in L3–L5. A total of 52 patients received CT-guided transforaminal infiltrations; 55 patients received non-imaging-guided nerve root infiltrations. The therapeutic success was evaluated regarding number of physician contacts, duration of treatment, type of analgesics used and loss of work days. Defined endpoint was surgery at the lower lumbar spine.

Results

In the CT group, patients needed significantly less oral analgesics (p < 0.001). Overall treatment duration and physician contacts were significantly lower in the CT group (p < 0.001 and 0.002) either. In the CT group, patients lost significant fewer work days due to incapacity (p < 0.001). Surgery had to be performed in 18.2 % of the non-imaging group patients (CT group: 1.9 %; p = 0.008).

Conclusion

This study shows that CT-guided periradicular infiltration in lumbosciatica caused by intervertebral disc herniation is significantly superior to non-imaging, anatomical landmark-guided infiltration, regarding the parameters investigated. The high number of treatment failures in the non-imaging group underlines the inferiority of this treatment concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CTG:

CT group

NIG:

Non-imaging group

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

References

  1. Statistisches Bundesamt, Gesundheit, Krankheitskosten (2008): Fachserie 12, Serie 7.2: 36

  2. Balague F, Af M, Pellise F, Cedraschi C (2007) Clinical update: low back pain. Lancet 369:726–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Karppinen J, Malmivaara A, Kurunlahti M, Kyllönen E, Pienimäki T, Nieminen P, Ohinmaa A, Tervonen O, Vanharanta H (2001) Periradicular infiltration for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial. Spine 26(9):1059–1067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ridley MG, Kingsley GH, Gibson T, Grahame R (1988) Outpatient lumbar epidural corticosteroid injection in the management of sciatica. Br J Rheumatol 27:295–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DePalma MJ, Bhargava A, Slipman CW (2005) A critical appraisal of the evidence for selective nerve root injection in the treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1477–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Young IA, Hyman GS, Packia-Raj LN, Cole AJ (2007) The use of lumbar epidural/transforaminal steroids for managing spinal disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:228–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts ST, Willick SE, Rho ME, Rittenberg JD (2009) Efficacy of lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a systematic review. PM+ R 1(7):657–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vad VB, Bhat AL, Lutz GE, Cammisa F (2002) Transforaminal epidural steroid injections in lumbarsacral radiculopathy: a prospective randomised study. Spine 27:11–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lutz GE, Vad VB, Wisneski RJ (1998) Fluoroscopic transforaminal lumbar epidural steroids: an outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79(11):1362–1366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tajima T, Furukawa K, Kuramochi E (1980) Selective lumbosacral radiculography and Block. Spine 5:68–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Artner J, Lattig F, Reichel H, Cakir B (2012) Effective dose of CT-guided epidural and periradicular injections of the lumbar spine: a retrospective study. Open Orthop J 6:357–361

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dilke TFW, Burry HC, Grahame R (1973) Extradural corticosteroid injection in management of lumbar nerve root compression. Br Med J 2(5867):635–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. German Institute for Medical Documentation and Infromation (2006) Internationale statistische Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme 10. Revision Version 2006 WHO-Ausgabe http://www.dimdi.de/dynamic/de/klassi/downloadcenter/icd-10who/version2006/regelwerk/x2vbp2006.zip [2nd of March 2007]

  14. Theodoridis T (2007) Injection therapy of the spine without imaging. Orthopaede 36(1):73–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carette S, Leclaire R, Marcoux S, Morin F, Blaise GA, St-Pierre A, Truchon R, Parent F, Levésque J, Bergeron V, Montminy P, Blanchette C (1997) Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus. N Engl J Med 336(23):1634–1640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee KS, Lin CL, Hwang SL, Howng SL, Wang CK (2005) Transforaminal periradicular infiltration guided by CT for unilateral sciatica: an outcome study. J Clin Imag 29:211–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seibel RMM, Groenemeyer DHW, Grumme TH (1990) New methods of treatment of spinal column diseases using interventional radiological techniques. In: Seibel RMM, Groenemeyer DHW (eds) Interventional computed tomography, 1st edn. Blackwell, Boston, pp 100–115

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mink JH, Deutsch AL, Goldstein TB (1998) Spinal imaging and intervention. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 9:343–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cyteval C, Fescquet N, Thomas E, Decoux E, Blotman F, Taourel P (2006) Predictive factors of efficacy of periradicular corticosteroid injections for lumbar radiculopathy. Am J Neuroradiol 27(5):978–982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lutze M, Stendel R, Vesper J, Brock M (1997) Periradicular therapy in lumbar radicular syndrome: methodology and results. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:719–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C (1993) Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine 18:1425–1432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Igarashi T, Kikuchi S, Shubayev V, Myers RR (2000) Volvo award winner in basic science studies: exogenous tumor necrosis factor-alpha mimics nucleus pulposus induced neuropathology. Molecular, histologic, and behavioral comparisons in rats. Spine 25:2975–2980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Takahashi H, Suguro T, Okazima Y, Motegi M, Okada Y, Kakiuchi T (1996) Inflammatory cytokines in the herniated disc of the lumbar spine. Spine 21:218–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Riew KD, Yin Y, Gilula L, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Lauryssen C, Goette K (2000) The effect of nerve-root injections on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82-A(11):1589–1593

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have a competing interest to disclose in relation with this work. There was no founding of this research work. There was no presentation of this data before.

Ethical statement

This study is in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. No human experimentation was done.

Consent statement

Routine clinical data were collected and analysed retrospectively, anonymized and in aggregate, thus no consent was obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moritz C. Deml.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deml, M.C., Buhr, M., Wimmer, M.D. et al. CT-guided infiltration saves surgical intervention and fastens return to work compared to anatomical landmark-guided infiltration in patients with lumbosciatica. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25 (Suppl 1), 177–182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1602-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1602-9

Keywords

Navigation