Skip to main content
Log in

Periradicular therapy in lumbar radicular syndromes: Methodology and results

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Periradicular therapy (PRT) has become popular in the treatment of lumbar radicular complaints, both primary, due to disc herniations (Group 1), and postoperative, following disc surgery (Group 2). However, hitherto repored data on ‘periradicular injections’ are more of a technical nature. The present study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic success of CT-versus fluoroscope-guided periradicular injections of local anaesthetics and corticoids, and to investigate the impact of imaging procedures on the results. We report on 80 patients who underwent CT-guided (n=40) or fluoroscope-guided (n=40) PRT for lumbar radicular irritation since April 1993. Forty patients had primary nerve root irritation due to disc protrusion, and 40 suffered from postoperative epidural fibrosis. Follow-up consisted in a clinical examination and an interview one day after each injection as well as 1 and 6 months later. Assessment was based on a score taking into account the clinical findings, the patient's complaints, and the patient's evaluation.

Six months following treatment there was a significant reduction of ischialgia in both Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). However, the results were significantly poorer in Group 2 (postoperative). Among the patients not operated on, those who underwent CT-guided injections had a significantly better outcome (p < 0.001). PRT had no significant influence on low back pain or pseudoradicular syndromes. The improvement of sensory disturbances achieved by both CT- and fluoroscope-guided injections in patients not previously submitted to surgery is statistically significant (p < 0.05). As compared to Group 1 (no surgery), the positive effects in patients of Group 2 were of significantly shorter duration (p<0.05). Motor deficits were not influenced by the treatment. Long-term follow-up shows that there is no positive effect in those patients in whom the first two PRT attempts had failed. Thus, PRT represents a useful long-term therapeutic alternative for lumbar radicular syndromes, particularly when due to primary discogenic compression. CT-guided injection is superior to fluoroscope-assisted treatment for both its visualization and its longer-lasting effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldrete JA, Brown CA, Yarcho KL (1994) Cervical radiculopathy treated by infusion of epidural analgesics in homebound patients. J Clin Anesth 6: 33–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Annertz M, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B, Holtas S (1995) No relationship between epidural fibrosis and sciatica in the lumbar postdiscectomy syndrome: A study with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Spine 20: 449–453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogduk N (1995) Spine update: Epidural steroids. Spine 20: 845–848

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bush K, Cowan N, Katz DE, Gishen P (1992) The natural history of sciatica associated with disc pathology: A prospective study with clinical and independent radiologic follow-up. Spine 17: 1205–1212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bush K, Hillier S (1991) A controlled study of caudal epidural injections of triamcinolone plus procaine for the management of intractable sciatica. Spine 16: 572–575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Byrüd G, Olmarker K, Konno S, Larsson K, Takahashi K, Rydevik B (1995) A rapid transpot route between the epidural space and the intraneural capillaries of the nerve roots. Spine 20: 138–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Castro WHM, Grönemeyer D, Jerosch J, Seibel R, Lorenz G, Beutelstahl D, Ohlbrecht K, Gohlke KH (1994) How reliable is lumbar nerve root sheath injection? Eur Spine J 3: 255–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dooley JF, McBroom RJ, Taguchi T, Macnab I (1988) Nerve root injection in the diagnosis of radicular pain. Spine 13: 79–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grönemeyer D, Seibel R (1989) Interventionelle Computertomographie: Lehrbuch und Atlas zur interventionellen Operationstechnik und Schmerztherapie. Überreuter, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kirsch, C (1948) An attempt to diagnose the level of a disc lesion clinically by disc puncture. Acta Orthop Scand 18: 132–140

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers P, Nash T, Schiller D, Normal J (1992) Epidural steroids for sciatica. Pain Clinic 5: 67–72

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sicard A (1907) Les injections médicamenteuses extra-durales par voie sacrococcygienne. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances et Memoires de la Société de Biologie 53: 396–398

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stanley D, McLaren MI, Euinton HA, Getty CJM (1989) A prospective study of nerve root injection in the diagnosis of sciatica: A comparison with radiculography, computed tomography, and operative findings. Spine 15: 540–543

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshizawa H, Kobayashi S, Morita T (1995) Chronic nerve root compression: Pathophysiologic mechanism of nerve root dysfunction. Spine 20: 397–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutze, M., Stendel, R., Vesper, J. et al. Periradicular therapy in lumbar radicular syndromes: Methodology and results. Acta neurochir 139, 719–724 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420044

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420044

Keywords

Navigation