Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is fractal dimension a reliable imaging biomarker for the quantitative classification of an intervertebral disk?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to explore the feasibility of the fractal method used in decoding disk heterogeneity, hoping to find a reliable imaging biomarker for the quantitative and continuous grading of intervertebral disks (IVDs).

Methods

Totally, 180 IVDs in 65 low back pain patients (29 males, 36 female, 28–69 years) were examined with MRI. Each IVD was manually segmented on axial slice (at the mid-height layer of the disk). All disks were visually evaluated regarding degeneration grade, using Pfirrmann classification, by two experienced radiologists. Fractal dimension (FD) of the IVD was calculated from the defined regions of interest and correlated with Pfirrmann grade.

Results

Fractal dimension differed significantly between any two groups (P < 0.01). The mean FDs for the four grades were as follows: Pfirrmann 1: 1.13 ± 0.02; Pfirrmann 2: 1.30 ± 0.05; Pfirrmann 3: 1.50 ± 0.05; and Pfirrmann 4: 1.65 ± 0.02. The well-hydrated IVDs displayed low fractal dimension. Degenerated IVDs displayed increased fractal dimension caused by disk heterogeneity, where the fractal dimension was shown to correlate strongly with Pfirrmann grade.

Conclusions

Fractal dimension associated well with IVD degeneration, determined with Pfirrmann grading, suggesting that the IVD fractal analysis was a suitable detection tool for the objective and continuous classification of IVD degeneration.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dong WL, Li YC, Liu SW, Jiang YY, Mao F, Qi L, Zeng XY, Zhou MG (2017) The disease burden for low back pain in China, 1990 and 2013. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 51:132–136. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2017.02.007*10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2017.02.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hurwitz EL, Randhawa K, Yu H, Cote P, Haldeman S (2018) The global spine care initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Eur Spine J 27:796–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5432-9*10.1007/s00586-017-5432-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1873–1878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kerttula L, Kurunlahti M, Jauhiainen J, Koivula A, Oikarinen J, Tervonen O (2001) Apparent diffusion coefficients and T2 relaxation time measurements to evaluate disc degeneration. A quantitative MR study of young patients with previous vertebral fracture. Acta Radiol 42:585–591

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watanabe A, Benneker LM, Boesch C, Watanabe T, Obata T, Anderson SE (2007) Classification of intervertebral disk degeneration with axial T2 mapping. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:936–942. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2142*10.2214/AJR.07.2142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lerski RA, Straughan K, Schad LR, Boyce D, Bluml S, Zuna I (1993) MR image texture analysis—an approach to tissue characterization. Magn Reson Imaging 11:873–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Waldenberg C, Hebelka H, Brisby H, Lagerstrand KM (2018) MRI histogram analysis enables objective and continuous classification of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 27:1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5264-7*10.1007/s00586-017-5264-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zapletalova A, Pata V, Janis R, Kejlova K, Stoklasek P (2017) Objective measurements of skin surface roughness after microdermabrasion treatment. Skin Res Technol 23:346–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12341*10.1111/srt.12341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou R, Luo Y, Fenster A, Spence JD, Ding M (2019) Fractal dimension based carotid plaque characterization from three-dimensional ultrasound images. Med Biol Eng Comput 57:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1865-5*10.1007/s11517-018-1865-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Todoroff N, Kunze J, Schreuder H, Hessler G, Baringhaus KH, Schneider G (2014) Fractal dimensions of macromolecular structures. Mol Inform 33:588–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201400090*10.1002/minf.201400090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fraser RD, Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B (1993) Intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 1:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00298361*10.1007/bf00298361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahlhelm F, Naumann N, Maher A, Shariat K, Ulmer S (2019) Degenerative intervertebral disc processes: current aspects of diagnosis. Radiologe 59:925–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-019-00595-z*10.1007/s00117-019-00595-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Streba CT, Pirici D, Vere CC, Mogoanta L, Comanescu V, Rogoveanu I (2011) Fractal analysis differentiation of nuclear and vascular patterns in hepatocellular carcinomas and hepatic metastasis. Rom J Morphol Embryol 52:845–854

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiler C, Nerlich AG, Zipperer J, Bachmeier BE, Boos N (2002) 2002 SSE Award Competition in Basic Science: expression of major matrix metalloproteinases is associated with intervertebral disc degradation and resorption. Eur Spine J 11:308–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0472-0*10.1007/s00586-002-0472-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aprill C, Bogduk N (1992) High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 65:361–369. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-65-773-361*10.1259/0007-1285-65-773-361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu SW, Haughton VM, Sether LA, Wagner M (1989) Comparison of MR and diskography in detecting radial tears of the anulus: a postmortem study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 10:1077–1081

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Peng B, Hou S, Wu W, Zhang C, Yang Y (2006) The pathogenesis and clinical significance of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) of lumbar intervertebral disc on MR imaging in the patient with discogenic low back pain. Eur Spine J 15:583–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0892-8*10.1007/s00586-005-0892-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu C, Cai HX, Zhang JF, Ma JJ, Lu YJ, Fan SW (2014) Quantitative estimation of the high-intensity zone in the lumbar spine: comparison between the symptomatic and asymptomatic population. Spine J 14:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.078*10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lam KS, Carlin D, Mulholland RC (2000) Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source. Eur Spine J 9:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050006*10.1007/s005860050006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S (2000) 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: Lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2987–2992. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012010-00005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research supported by the Subject Innovation Team of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine (#2019-QN09).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, 2# Weiyang Western Road, Xianyang, 712000, China

    Junchao Ma, Ruifeng Wang, Yong Yu, Xiaotong Xu, Haifeng Duan & Nan Yu

Authors
  1. Junchao Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruifeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaotong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haifeng Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nan Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nan Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 2795 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, J., Wang, R., Yu, Y. et al. Is fractal dimension a reliable imaging biomarker for the quantitative classification of an intervertebral disk?. Eur Spine J 29, 1175–1180 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06370-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06370-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation