Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of trunk motion in adolescents with right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although standard radiography is currently used for deformity assessment in AIS patients, it is performed in a constrained position and probably not reflective of spinal balance during daily-life activities. Our main objective was to compare trunk motion in Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients to healthy volunteers, using gait analysis.

Material and methods

Lenke 1 or 2 AIS patients planned for surgery were included. The day before surgery, they underwent radiographic evaluation and gait analysis. Among the gait parameters, sagittal vertical axis (Dyn-SVA), shoulder line rotation (Dyn-SL rotation), pelvis rotation (Dyn-P rotation) and acromion pelvis angle (Dyn-APA) were measured. AIS patients were compared to 25 asymptomatic controls.

Results

A total of 57 patients were included in the study, with a mean Cobb angle of 55.4°. AIS patients had a lower Dyn-SVA when compared to controls (47.0 vs. 62.9 mm, p = 0.012). Dyn-APA and Dyn-SL rotation were negative in AIS patients, meaning that shoulder line was rotated towards the left (− 6.4 vs. 7.8° and − 7.5 vs. − 0.4°, p<0.001, respectively). On the other hand, Dyn-P rotation was positive, meaning that pelvis was rotated towards the right side during gait (1.1 vs. − 0.5, p = 0.026).

Discussion

This is one of the largest series of gait analysis in AIS patients. We demonstrated that AIS patients have an abnormal gait pattern, with a decreased anterior tilt of the trunk and transverse plane abnormalities. We found that gait deviation was not related to radiographic measurements, pointing out that dynamic assessment provides new data about spinal posture.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JCY et al (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet (London, England) 371:1527–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pesenti S, Jouve JL, Morin C et al (2015) Evolution of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of a multicenter study at 20 years’ follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2015.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL (2001) Radiologic findings and curve progression 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of brace and surgical treatment with matching control group of straight individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:516–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wibmer C, Trotsenko P, Gilg MM et al (2018) Observational retrospective study on socio-economic and quality of life outcomes in 41 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 5 years after bracing combined with physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE). Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5746-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marks MC, Stanford CF, Mahar AT, Newton PO (2003) Standing lateral radiographic positioning does not represent customary standing balance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1176–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000067271.00258.51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gage JR (1983) Gait analysis for decision-making in cerebral palsy. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 43:147–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Riley PO, Paolini G, Della Croce U et al (2007) A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 26:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ollivier M, Parratte S, Lunebourg A et al (2016) The John Insall Award: no functional benefit after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific instrumentation: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:60–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4259-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan N, Bruno P (2017) Analysis of 3D multi-segment lumbar spine motion during gait and prone hip extension. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 33:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.02.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Negrini S, Piovanelli B, Amici C et al (2016) Trunk motion analysis: a systematic review from a clinical and methodological perspective. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 52:583–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Konz RJ, Fatone S, Stine RL et al (2006) A kinematic model to assess spinal motion during walking. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E898–E906. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000245939.97637.ae

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee CS, Chung SS, Kang KC et al (2011) Normal patterns of sagittal alignment of the spine in young adults radiological analysis in a Korean population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E1648–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216b0fd

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blondel B, Viehweger E, Moal B et al (2015) Postural spinal balance defined by net intersegmental moments: results of a biomechanical approach and experimental errors measurement. World J Orthop 6:983–90. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.983

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Blondel B, Pomero V, Moal B et al (2012) Sagittal spine posture assessment: feasibility of a protocol based on intersegmental moments. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.12.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pesenti S, Prost S, Blondel B et al (2019) Correlations linking static quantitative gait analysis parameters to radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.09.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahaudens P, Banse X, Mousny M, Detrembleur C (2009) Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. Eur Spine J 18:512–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0899-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishida M, Nagura T, Fujita N et al (2017) Position of the major curve influences asymmetrical trunk kinematics during gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait Posture 51:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang JH, Suh S-W, Sung PS, Park W-H (2013) Asymmetrical gait in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:2407–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2845-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kramers-De Quervain IA, Müller R, Stacoff A et al (2004) Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 13:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0588-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenke LG (2005) Lenke classification system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Instr Course Lect 54:537–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME (1990) Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res 8:383–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100080310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Paul JC, Patel A, Bianco K et al (2014) Gait stability improvement after fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is influenced by corrective measures in coronal and sagittal planes. Gait Posture 40:510–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kramers-de Quervain IA, Müller R, Stacoff A et al (2004) Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 13:449–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0588-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Patel A, Pivec R, Shah NV et al (2018) Motion analysis in the axial plane after realignment surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait Posture 66:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu P-P, Yu M, Liu X-G et al (2018) How does the sagittal spinal balance of the scoliotic population deviate from the asymptomatic population? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-1954-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Roussouly P, Labelle H, Rouissi J, Bodin A (2013) Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2571-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Assaiante C, Mallau S, Jouve J-L et al (2012) Do adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) neglect proprioceptive information in sensory integration of postural control? PLoS ONE 7:e40646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Pesenti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 332 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pesenti, S., Prost, S., Pomero, V. et al. Characterization of trunk motion in adolescents with right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 28, 2025–2033 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06067-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06067-1

Keywords

Navigation