Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

External validation of the adult spinal deformity (ASD) frailty index (ASD-FI)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the ability of the recently developed adult spinal deformity frailty index (ASD-FI) to predict odds of perioperative complications, odds of reoperation, and length of hospital stay after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery using a database other than the one used to create the index.

Methods

We used the ASD-FI to calculate frailty scores for 266 ASD patients who had minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years in the European Spine Study Group (ESSG) database. Patients were enrolled from 2012 through 2013. Using ASD-FI scores, we categorized patients as not frail (NF) (< 0.3 points), frail (0.3–0.5 points), or severely frail (SF) (> 0.5 points). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for preoperative and surgical factors such as operative time and blood loss, was performed to determine the relationship between ASD-FI category and odds of major complications, odds of reoperation, and length of hospital stay.

Results

We categorized 135 patients (51%) as NF, 90 patients (34%) as frail, and 41 patients (15%) as SF. Overall mean ASD-FI score was 0.29 (range 0–0.8). The adjusted odds of experiencing a major intraoperative or postoperative complication (OR 4.5, 95% CI 2.0–10) or having a reoperation (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7–8.9) were higher for SF patients compared with NF patients. Mean hospital stay was 2.1 times longer (95% CI 1.8–2.4) for SF patients compared with NF patients.

Conclusions

Greater patient frailty, as measured by the ASD-FI, is associated with longer hospital stays and greater odds of major complications and reoperation.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA et al (2013) Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:392–397

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schuurmans H, Steverink N, Lindenberg S, Frieswijk N, Slaets JP (2004) Old or frail: what tells us more? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:M962–M965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farhat JS, Velanovich V, Falvo AJ et al (2012) Are the frail destined to fail? Frailty index as predictor of surgical morbidity and mortality in the elderly. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:1526–1530 (discussion 1530–1521)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph B, Pandit V, Sadoun M et al (2014) Frailty in surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:1151–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim SW, Han HS, Jung HW et al (2014) Multidimensional frailty score for the prediction of postoperative mortality risk. JAMA Surg 149:633–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koller H, Pfanz C, Meier O et al (2016) Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients. Eur Spine J 25:532–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Worley N, Marascalchi B, Jalai CM et al (2016) Predictors of inpatient morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 25:819–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Riley MS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Dalton J, Kelly MP (2017) Health-related quality of life outcomes in complex adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 28:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scheer JK, Mundis GM, Klineberg E et al (2016) Recovery following adult spinal deformity surgery: the effect of complications and reoperation in 149 patients with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 25:2612–2621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K (2001) Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci World J 1:323–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K (2008) A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr 8:24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller EK, Neuman BJ, Jain A, Daniels AH, Ailon T, Sciubba DM, Kebaish KM, Lafage V, Scheer JK, Smith JS, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, International Spine Study Group (2017) An assessment of frailty as a tool for risk stratification in adult spinal deformity surgery. Neurosurg Focus 43(6):E3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kulminski AM, Ukraintseva SV, Kulminskaya IV et al (2008) Cumulative deficits better characterize susceptibility to death in elderly people than phenotypic frailty: lessons from the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:898–903

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Glassman SD, Alegre G, Carreon L, Dimar JR, Johnson JR (2003) Perioperative complications of lumbar instrumentation and fusion in patients with diabetes mellitus. Spine J 3:496–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH et al (2007) The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine 32:2764–2770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McDonnell MF, Glassman SD, Dimar JR II, Puno RM, Johnson JR (1996) Perioperative complications of anterior procedures on the spine. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78:839–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Passias PG, Poorman GW, Jalai CM et al (2017) Morbidity of adult spinal deformity surgery in elderly has declined over time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E978–E982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ali R, Schwalb JM, Nerenz DR, Antoine HJ, Rubinfeld I (2016) Use of the modified frailty index to predict 30-day morbidity and mortality from spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 25:537–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Somani S, Capua JD, Kim JS et al (2017) ASA classification as a risk stratification tool in adult spinal deformity surgery: a study of 5805 patients. Global Spine J 7:719–726

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for the European Spine Study Group database was provided by DePuy Synthes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Neuman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

Institutional review board approval for patient inclusion in this database was obtained by each of the sites that contributed patient information. Each patient signed a consent document before inclusion.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 139 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, E.K., Vila-Casademunt, A., Neuman, B.J. et al. External validation of the adult spinal deformity (ASD) frailty index (ASD-FI). Eur Spine J 27, 2331–2338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5575-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5575-3

Keywords

Navigation