Skip to main content
Log in

Vertebral subluxation during three-column osteotomy in surgical correction of adult spine deformity: incidence, risk factors, and complications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate incidence, risk factors, and complications of vertebral subluxation (VS) during three-column osteotomy in surgical correction of adult spine deformity.

Methods

Adult spine deformity patients who underwent three-column osteotomies including VCR, PSO, and other modified types from March 2000 to December 2014 in our center were retrospectively reviewed. The following parameters were measured pre- and postoperatively: Cobb angle of main curve, global kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, and kyphosis flexibility. Radiographic parameters between groups (VCR vs. PSO and subluxation vs. non-subluxation) were compared.

Results

171 ASD patients were recruited, 18 of which (10.5%) developed sagittal vertebral subluxation at the osteotomy site. 5 of 18 patients (27.8%) developed neurological complications after surgery. For these five patients, two patients got partial recovery, and three got complete recovery at 2-year follow-up. 116 patients underwent PSO, 12 of which (10.3%) developed sagittal vertebral subluxation. In 55 patients receiving VCR, 6 (10.9%) developed sagittal vertebral subluxation. No significant difference was noted between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean age of VS group was larger than that of non-VS group (46.2 vs. 34.2, P < 0.05). VS group had less kyphosis flexibility (11 vs. 23%, P < 0.05). More patients in VS group had preoperative sagittal VS as compared to non-VS group (77.8 vs. 20.9%, P < 0.05). VS group had more neurological complications than non-VS group (25 vs. 5.4%, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

VS occurred in one-tenth of patients receiving three-column osteotomies, one-fourth of which would develop neurological deficits. Older age, rigid kyphosis, and the pre-existence of VS were risk factors for developing VS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aebi M (2005) The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14:925–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koller H, Pfanz C, Meier O, Hitzl W, Mayer M, Bullmann V, Schulte TL (2016) Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients. Eur Spine J 25:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Stobbs G, Bridwell KH (2007) Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2238–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hassanzadeh H, Jain A, El Dafrawy MH, Ain MC, Mesfin A, Skolasky RL et al (2013) Three-column osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformity in adult patients 60 years old and older: outcome and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:726–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diebo BG, Lafage R, Ames CP, Bess S, Obeid I, Klineberg E et al (2016) Ratio of lumbar 3-column osteotomy closure: patient-specific deformity characteristics and level of resection impact correction of truncal versus pelvic compensation. Eur Spine J 20:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, Demakakos J, Lenke L, Tropiano P et al (2013) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery 76:112–120

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kuhns CA, Lehman RA, Kim JY, Stewart D, Baldus C (2007) Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy a 10-year assessment. Spine 32:2245–2252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang BP, Ondra SL, Chen LA, Jung HS, Koski TR, Salehi SA (2006) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine 5:9–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayhan S, Aykac B, Yuksel S, Guler UO, Pellise F, Alanay A et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of osteotomies in adult spinal deformity: what happens in the first year? Eur Spine J 25:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Sansur CA, Glassman SD, Ames CP, Berven SH et al (2011) Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1218–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lenke LG, O’Leary PT, Bridwell KH et al (2009) Posterior vertebral column resection for severe pediatric deformity: minimum two-year follow-up of thirty-five consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2213–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian BP, Mao SH, Jiang J, Wang B, Qiu Y (2017) Mechanisms, predisposing factors, and prognosis of intraoperative vertebral subluxation during pedicle subtraction osteotomy in surgical correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E983–E990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qian BP, Wang XH, Qiu Y et al (2012) The influence of closing-opening wedge osteotomy on sagittal balance in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison with closing wedge osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1415–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang KW, Cheng CW, Chen HC et al (2008) Closing-opening wedge osteotomy for the treatment of sagittal imbalance. Spine 33:1470–1477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw R, Skovrlj B, Cho SK (2016) Association between age and complications in adult scoliosis surgery: an analysis of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:508–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith JS, Sansur CA, Donaldson WF 3rd, Perra JH, Mudiyam R, Choma TJ et al (2011) Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:958–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Lafage R, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Kim HJ et al (2017) Three-column osteotomy for correction of cervical and cervicothoracic deformities: alignment changes and early complications in a multicenter prospective series of 23 patients. Eur Spine J 30:1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81501932), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20150107), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M570440).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun Qiao or Zezhang Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, J., Xiao, L., Sun, X. et al. Vertebral subluxation during three-column osteotomy in surgical correction of adult spine deformity: incidence, risk factors, and complications. Eur Spine J 27, 630–635 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5285-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5285-2

Keywords

Navigation