Skip to main content
Log in

Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of 42 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and 24 normal adolescents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Kyphosis of the cervical spine has been reported in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, few reports have compared sagittal spine alignment of AIS patients with that of the normal population. The purposes of this study were (1) to analyze the characteristics of sagittal alignment, including the cervical spine, in AIS patients with a single thoracic curve (Lenke type 1) compared with the age-matched normal population and (2) to quantify the changes in sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and thoracic kyphosis following posterior spinal fusion.

Methods

In study 1, pre- and postoperative X-ray were measured for the following sagittal plane parameters: lumbar lordosis angle (L1–S1; LL), thoracic kyphosis angle (Th5-12; TK), sacral slope (SS), C7 plumb line (C7PL), cervical lordosis angle (C2–C7 angle; CL), and T1 slope. These measurements were then evaluated with CL and other parameters using spearman rank correlation coefficient between two groups. Comparison was made with the sagittal plane parameters from preoperative 42 AIS (AIS group) with main thoracic curve and 24 normal populations (Control group). In study 2, 38 operative AIS patients had at least 1-year follow-up. These patients (38 AIS patients after the correction surgery) were enrolled. We collected for each patient on pre- and postoperative sagittal plane parameters of X-ray.

Results

In study 1, LL and C7PL did not differ significantly between the groups. Although CL was observed in 10 of the 24 patients (41.7 %) in the Control group, the CL was smaller in the AIS group, with 6 of 42 patients (14.3 %). The CL correlated significantly with T1 slope (r = 0.634), C7PL (r = 0.684), and TK (r = 0.311) in the AIS group, and with T1 slope (r = 0.681) and C7PL (r = 0.451) in the Control group. No correlations were observed with respect to the TK. In study 2, the mean CL improved significantly from 7.2° kyphosis preoperatively to 0.1° kyphosis postoperatively. Interestingly, Spearman correlation analysis showed that the postoperative CL correlated significantly with postoperative TK (r = 0.607), postoperative T1 slope (r = 0.701), and postoperative C7PL (r = 0.373).

Conclusions

There were no effects of scoliosis on sagittal spine parameters such as LL and C7PL in AIS patients with a main thoracic curve. Cervical spine alignment was affected by the thoracic deformity in the sagittal plane, as shown by the reduction in the CL after the operation. These findings suggest that TK may be a cause of cervical kyphosis in AIS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, Circo AB, de Mauroy JC, Durmala J, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Minozzi S, O’Brien JP, Papadopoulos D, Rigo M, Rivard CH, Romano M, Wynne JH, Villagrasa M, Weiss HR, Zaina F (2012) 2011 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis 7:3. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Illes T, Somoskeoy S (2010) Re: Sangole AP, Aubin CE, Labelle H, et al. Three-dimensional classification of thoracic scoliotic curves. Spine 2009;34:91–9. Spine 35:465. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc39b3 (author reply 465–466)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine 34:1828–1833. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A (1983) Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine 8:576–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ofiram E, Garvey TA, Schwender JD, Wroblewski JM, Winter RB (2009) Cervical degenerative changes in idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent long fusion to the sacrum as adults: incidence, severity, and evolution. J Orthop Traumatol Off J Ital Soc Orthop Traumatol 10:27–30. doi:10.1007/s10195-008-0044-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roussouly P, Labelle H, Rouissi J, Bodin A (2013) Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S203–S215. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2571-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hilibrand AS, Tannenbaum DA, Graziano GP, Loder RT, Hensinger RN (1995) The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 15:627–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Canavese F, Turcot K, De Rosa V, de Coulon G, Kaelin A (2011) Cervical spine sagittal alignment variations following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20:1141–1148. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1837-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu P, Yu M, Liu X, Zhu B, Liu X, Liu Z (2015) Analysis of the relationship between coronal and sagittal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3986-y

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clement JL, Geoffray A, Yagoubi F, Chau E, Solla F, Oborocianu I, Rampal V (2013) Relationship between thoracic hypokyphosis, lumbar lordosis and sagittal pelvic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine J 22:2414–2420. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2852-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Upasani VV, Tis J, Bastrom T, Pawelek J, Marks M, Lonner B, Crawford A, Newton PO (2007) Analysis of sagittal alignment in thoracic and thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how do these two curve types differ? Spine 32:1355–1359. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318059321d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1169–1181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien MF KT, Blanke KM, Lenke LG (2008) Radiographic measurement manual. Spinal Deformity Study Group

  14. Yu M, Silvestre C, Mouton T, Rachkidi R, Zeng L, Roussouly P (2013) Analysis of the cervical spine sagittal alignment in young idiopathic scoliosis: a morphological classification of 120 cases. Eur Spine J 22:2372–2381. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2753-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pasha S, Aubin CE, Sangole AP, Labelle H, Parent S, Mac-Thiong JM (2014) Three-dimensional spinopelvic relative alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 39:564–570. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pesenti S, Blondel B, Peltier E, Choufani E, Bollini G, Jouve JL (2016) Interest of T1 parameters for sagittal alignment evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Eur Spine J 25:424–429. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4244-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Charlebois M, Huot MP, de Guise JA (2003) Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis according to the coronal curve type. Spine 28:1404–1409. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000067118.60199.d1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ilharreborde B, Vidal C, Skalli W, Mazda K (2013) Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posteromedial translation. Eur Spine J 22:330–337. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2493-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Wormser B, Amin H, Kimball JS, Ames RJ, Rothkrug AS, Cahill PJ (2012) Comparison of 5-year outcomes between pedicle screw and hybrid constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine 17:212–219. doi:10.3171/2012.6.spine1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kouwenhoven JW, Castelein RM (2008) The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review of the literature. Spine 33:2898–2908. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang WJ, Yeung HY, Chu WC, Tang NL, Lee KM, Qiu Y, Burwell RG, Cheng JC (2011) Top theories for the etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 31:S14–S27. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181f73c12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moskowitz A, Moe JH, Winter RB, Binner H (1980) Long-term follow-up of scoliosis fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:364–376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, Kang SS, Jeon WK, Lee JS (2016) Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and health-related quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4488-2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akihiko Hiyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hiyama, A., Sakai, D., Watanabe, M. et al. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of 42 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and 24 normal adolescents. Eur Spine J 25, 3226–3233 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4701-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4701-3

Keywords

Navigation