Abstract
Purpose
Wound infection after spine surgery is a debilitating complication. Local placement of vancomycin powder into the surgical wounds prior to closing of the fascia has been introduced as a method to reduce deep infection rates.
Methods
The infection rates of all the patients who were treated with intra-operative local vancomycin between June 2012 and June 2013 were compared to all cases that were not treated with vancomycin between January 2009 and December 2010. Patients for both groups were operated by four senior, fellowship-trained spine surgeons with a combined experience of 55 years of practice at a referral orthopedic center. Patients’ charts and microbiology reports were reviewed.
Results
1224 cases were performed with the use of vancomycin. The average age was 56.3 years (SD −13.2; NS). The male to female ratio was 1:1.12 (NS). 2253 cases were performed without the use of vancomycin. The average patient age was 57.1 years (SD 14.5). The male to female ratio was 1:1.14. There were 30 cases of deep infections needing a surgical irrigation and debridement without vancomycin versus 5 when vancomycin was used (P = 0.04). Infections in patients treated with vancomycin were not vancomycin-resistant bacteria.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the use of vancomycin reduces the rate of deep wound infections and irrigation and debridement procedures after spine surgery in a referral center among surgeons with a high surgical volume.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker FG 2nd (2002) Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in spinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 51:391–400 (discussion-1)
Calderone RR, Garland DE, Capen DA et al (1996) Cost of medical care for postoperative spinal infections. Orthop Clin North Am 27:171–182
Caputo AM, Dobbertien RP, Ferranti JM et al (2013) Risk factors for infection after orthopaedic spine surgery at a high-volume institution. J Surg Orthop Adv 22:295–298
Gans I, Dormans JP, Spiegel DA et al (2013) Adjunctive vancomycin powder in pediatric spine surgery is safe. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1703–1707
Godil SS, Parker SL, O’Neill KR et al (2013) Comparative effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of local application of vancomycin powder in posterior spinal fusion for spine trauma: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:331–335
Hahn F, Zbinden R, Min K (2005) Late implant infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J 14:783–788
Ho C, Skaggs DL, Weiss JM et al (2007) Management of infection after instrumented posterior spine fusion in pediatric scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2739–2744
Jones GA, Butler J, Lieberman I et al (2007) Negative-pressure wound therapy in the treatment of complex postoperative spinal wound infections: complications and lessons learned using vacuum-assisted closure. J Neurosurg Spine 6:407–411
Koutsoumbelis S, Hughes AP, Girardi FP et al (2011) Risk factors for postoperative infection following posterior lumbar instrumented arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1627–1633
Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong KL et al (2012) Infection risk for primary and revision instrumented lumbar spine fusion in the Medicare population. J Neurosurg Spine 17:342–347
Maruo K, Berven SH (2014) Outcome and treatment of postoperative spine surgical site infections: predictors of treatment success and failure. J Orthop Sci 19(3):398–404
Molinari RW, Khera OA, Molinari WJ 3rd (2012) Prophylactic intraoperative powdered vancomycin and postoperative deep spinal wound infection: 1,512 consecutive surgical cases over a 6-year period. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 4):S476–S482
Nordmann P, Naas T, Fortineau N et al (2007) Superbugs in the coming new decade; multidrug resistance and prospects for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 2010. Curr Opin Microbiol 10:436–440
O’Neill KR, Smith JG, Abtahi AM et al (2011) Reduced surgical site infections in patients undergoing posterior spinal stabilization of traumatic injuries using vancomycin powder. Spine J 11:641–646
Pappou IP, Papadopoulos EC, Sama AA et al (2006) Postoperative infections in interbody fusion for degenerative spinal disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:120–128
Richards BR, Emara KM (2001) Delayed infections after posterior TSRH spinal instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: revisited. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1990–1996
Savage JW, Weatherford BM, Sugrue PA et al (2012) Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in lumbar spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:490–494
Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA et al (2011) Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:556–563
Strom RG, Pacione D, Kalhorn SP et al (2013) Decreased risk of wound infection after posterior cervical fusion with routine local application of vancomycin powder. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(12):991–994
Sweet FA, Roh M, Sliva C (2011) Intra wound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions: efficacy, drug levels, and patient outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:2084–2088
Tay BK, Deckey J, Hu SS (2002) Spinal infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:188–197
van de Belt H, Neut D, Schenk W et al (2001) Infection of orthopedic implants and the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cements. A review. Acta Orthop Scand 72:557–571
Watanabe M, Sakai D, Matsuyama D et al (2010) Risk factors for surgical site infection following spine surgery: efficacy of intraoperative saline irrigation. J Neurosurg Spine 12:540–546
Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr (2000) Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 13:422–426
Acknowledgments
No funding or grants were given to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schroeder, J.E., Girardi, F.P., Sandhu, H. et al. The use of local vancomycin powder in degenerative spine surgery. Eur Spine J 25, 1029–1033 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4119-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4119-3