Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Few studies have examined gender differences in patient-oriented health-related quality of life before and after spine surgery. This study examined the influence of gender on baseline status and 1-year postoperative outcomes in a large series of patients undergoing surgery for different degenerative spinal disorders.

Methods

The study included 1518 patients [812 men and 706 women; mean (SD) age 61.4 ± 16.2 years], with three different pathologies (disc herniation, degenerative spondylolisthesis, or spinal stenosis), treated with specified surgical approaches. Preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Medical history, surgical details and perioperative complications were documented with the Eurospine “Spine Tango” Surgery 2006 form.

Results

Preoperatively and for all three pathologies, women had significantly (p < 0.05) worse COMI-scores than men, especially for the sub-domains “leg/buttock pain”, “dominant pain intensity”, and “general quality of life”; the change in the COMI sum score 12 months postoperatively showed no significant gender differences for any pathology (p > 0.05). 71.3 % males and 72.9 % females achieved the minimal clinically important change score (MCIC; 2.2 point reduction) for the COMI. Controlling for potential cofounders (preoperative COMI, ASA, complications, pathology), gender showed no significant association with the failure to achieve MCIC.

Conclusions

This results show that women do not differ significantly from men regarding their postoperative outcome, even though they present with a worse preoperative status. The management of a patient’s condition should not differ depending on their gender, since both men and women are able to improve to a similar extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G, COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain (2006) Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):S192–S300. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:2003–2013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Jacobshagen N, Semmer NK, Boos N (2007) Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16:777–786. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0255-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mannion AF, Elfering A (2006) Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S93–S108. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L, Oberg B (2003) Predictive factors for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Eur Spine J 12:274–280. doi:10.1007/s00586-003-0530-2

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2229–2233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Block AR, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Rashbaum RF, Hochschuler SH (2001) The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery. Spine J 1:274–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohlboeck G, Greimel KV, Piotrowski WP, Leibetseder M, Krombholz-Reindl M, Neuhofer R, Schmid A, Klinger R (2004) Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse. Clin J Pain 20:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL (2009) Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain 10:447–485. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL (1998) Gender differences in the reporting of physical and somatoform symptoms. Psychosom Med 60:150–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Unruh AM (1996) Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain 65:123–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berkley KJ (1997) Sex differences in pain. Behav Brain Sci 20:371–380 (discussion 435-513)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mannion AF, Junge A, Taimela S, Müntener M, Lorenzo K, Dvorak J (2001) Active therapy for chronic low back pain: part 3. Factors influencing self-rated disability and its change following therapy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:920–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mannion AF, Wieser S, Elfering A (2013) Association Between Beliefs and Care-Seeking Behavior for Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828473b5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli E, Liang MH, Karlson EW, Cleary PD (1994) Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:687–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G (1999) Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2313–2317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Strömqvist F, Ahmad M, Hildingsson C, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B (2008) Gender differences in lumbar disc herniation surgery. Acta Orthop 79:643–649. doi:10.1080/17453670810016669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vucetic N, Astrand P, Güntner P, Svensson O (1999) Diagnosis and prognosis in lumbar disc herniation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 361:116–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peul WC, Brand R, Thomeer RT, Koes BW (2008) Influence of gender and other prognostic factors on outcome of sciatica. Pain 138:180–191. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.12.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Anjarwalla NK, Brown LC, McGregor AH (2007) The outcome of spinal decompression surgery 5 years on. Eur Spine J 16:1842–1847. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0393-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lehto MU, Honkanen P (1995) Factors influencing the outcome of operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 137:25–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Häkkinen A, Kautiainen H, Järvenpää S, Arkela-Kautiainen M, Ylinen J (2007) Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 16:347–352. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0187-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Waddell G, Kummel EG, Lotto WN, Graham JD, Hall H, McCulloch JA (1979) Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:201–207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):374–379. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN (1997) Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med 102:524–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McCullen GM, Bernini PM, Bernstein SH, Tosteson TD (1994) Clinical and roentgenographic results of decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 7:380–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shabat S, Folman Y, Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Catz A, Gepstein R (2005) Gender differences as an influence on patients’ satisfaction rates in spinal surgery of elderly patients. Eur Spine J 14:1027–1032. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0808-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gepstein R, Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Folman Y (2006) Decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction. Spinal Cord 44:427–431. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101857

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D (2009) Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1590–1599. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819fcd52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Merchant RA, Lui KL, Ismail NH, Wong HP, Sitoh YY (2005) The relationship between postoperative complications and outcomes after hip fracture surgery. Ann Acad Med Singapore 34:163–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Moloney JT (1997) Postoperative ‘minor’ complications. Comparison between men and women. Anaesthesia 52:300–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Velanovich V (1993) The effects of age, gender, race and concomitant disease on postoperative complications. J R Coll Surg Edinb 38:225–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mannion AF, Fekete TF, Porchet F, Haschtmann D, Jeszenszky D, Kleinstück FS (2014) The influence of comorbidity on the risks and benefits of spine surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 1):S66–S71. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3189-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Levine FM, De Simone LL (1991) The effects of experimenter gender on pain report in male and female subjects. Pain 44:69–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shehab A, Al-Dabbagh B, AlHabib KF, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Almahmeed W, Sulaiman K, Al-Motarreb A, Nagelkerke N, Al Suwaidi J, Hersi A, Al Faleh H, Asaad N, Al Saif S, Amin H (2013) Gender disparities in the presentation, management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients: data from the 2nd Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE-2). PLoS One 8:e55508. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gijsbers van Wijk CM, van Vliet KP, Kolk AM (1996) Gender perspectives and quality of care: towards appropriate and adequate health care for women. Soc Sci Med 43:707–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Doyal L (2000) Gender equity in health: debates and dilemmas. Soc Sci Med 51:931–939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Schulthess Klinik Research Fund. We are grateful to Malgorzata Roos and Farouhar Mouttet for their assistance in conducting the statistical analyses. We would like to thank Dave O’Riordan, Gordana Balaban, Nora Aziz-Toth, Julian Amacker, Kirsten Clift, Selina Nauer, and Anne Fröhlich for their valuable assistance in collecting the questionnaire data and managing the Spine Tango Surgery data forms.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne F. Mannion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pochon, L., Kleinstück, F.S., Porchet, F. et al. Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 25, 235–246 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4062-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4062-3

Keywords

Navigation