Skip to main content
Log in

Adult scoliosis: age-related deformity and surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We retrospectively analyzed our results in thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated during adulthood.

Methods

Fifty-two thoracolumbar and 30 lumbar idiopathic scoliosis surgically treated were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 9.5 ± 6.6 years. All the subjects were analyzed by visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-36 scores before and after surgery and at follow-up. The scoliotic curve, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, and C7 plumb line were measured. For the statistical analysis, multivariate multiple regression models were formulated, considering as significative a P < 0.05.

Results

A statistically significant clinical and radiological amelioration was noted after surgery and at final follow-up. According to the logistic regression model, ODI was related to lumbar lordosis and spino-pelvic parameters at follow-up. The only determinant of failure was age.

Conclusions

Spino-pelvic recovery is easier in patients aged less than 60 years with PI < 55° and PT < 25°.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Le Huec JC, Charosky S, Barrey C, Rigal J, Aunoble S (2011) Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment. Eur Spine J 20(S5):S699–S703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aebi M (2005) The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14(10):925–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillaumat M (1999) Natural history of scoliosis from childhood to old age. Bull Acad. Nati Med 183(4):705–718

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M (1988) New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:10–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, Gonon G, Costanzo G, Dimnet J, Pasquet A (1982) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine 7(4):335–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stagnara P (1982) Scoliosis in adults. Consequences of idiopathic scoliosis in adulthood. Chirurgie 108(4):356–363

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubousset J (1994) Three dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein SL (ed) Pediatric spine: principles and practice. Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Roussouly P, Labelle H, Rouissi J, Bodin A (2012) Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults. Eur Spine J 22:S203–S215. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2571-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2003) Geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: proposed classification. Rev Chir Reparatr App Mot 89(7):632–639

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumbline: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 31(11):E320–E325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roussouly P, Nnadi C (2010) Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 19:1824–1836

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Farcy JP, Schwab FJ (1997) Management of flatback and related kyphotic decompensation syndromes. Spine 22:2452–2457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Huec JC, Aunoble S, Leijssen P, Pellet N (2011) Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. Eur Spine J 20(S5):S564–S571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P (2010) Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of seven hundred nine Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine 35(22):E1193–E1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Wald CJ, Stanley T (2006) Instrumentation-related complications of multilevel fusions for adult spinal deformity patients over age 65. Spine 31:S144–S151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Berjano P, Lamartina C (2013) Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:S242–S253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S, Patel A, Ungar B, Frcy JP (2011) Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment. Spine 36(13):1037–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murata Y, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Hanaoka E, Moriya H (2003) The knee-spine syndrome. Association between lumbar lordosis and extension of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mangione P, Senegas J (1997) L’équilibre rachidien dans le plan sagittal. Rev Chir Orthop 83:22–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cronen GA, Mulconrey DS, Buchowski JM, Kim YJ (2009) Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine 34(8):785–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Royen BJ, De Gast A, Smit TH (2000) Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 9(6):492–498

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Berthonnaud E, Dimner J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2004) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spine Disord 18(1):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Danisa OA, Turner D, Richardson WJ (2000) Surgical correction of lumbar kyphotic deformity: posterior reduction “eggshell” osteotomy. J Neurosurg 92(S1):50–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvana De Giorgi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Giorgi, S., De Giorgi, G., Borracci, C. et al. Adult scoliosis: age-related deformity and surgery. Eur Spine J 23 (Suppl 6), 597–603 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3549-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3549-7

Keywords

Navigation