Skip to main content
Log in

Segmental anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with preservation of middle vertebrae in the surgical management of 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, radiographic parameters, and complication rates of segmental anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (sACCF) plus preservation of middle vertebrae with those of cervical laminectomy plus fusion (CLF) in 67 patients with 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

Methods

Between July 2006 and May 2012, 67 consecutive patients [42 males and 25 females; mean age 57.8 years (range 34–77 years)] with 4-level CSM who underwent surgery and were followed for more than 1 year were enrolled in this study and divided into sACCF and CLF groups. The study compared perioperative parameters; surgery-related and instrumentation- and graft-related complication rates; clinical parameters; patient satisfaction; and radiologic parameters.

Results

Significant improvements were seen from preoperative to postoperative in both groups for all three measures of clinical outcome; between-group comparison revealed no significant difference for two of the three measures and significantly better scores for the CLF group in the third. Satisfaction was rated as excellent or good by 79.5 % of the sACCF group and 71.4 % of the CLF group, which was not a significant difference. Mean postoperative cervical lordosis was significantly greater in the sACCF group than in the CLF group. Blood loss and operative time were significantly greater in the CLF group than in the sACCF group and complication rate significantly lower for the sACCF group.

Conclusions

sACCF with preservation of middle vertebrae is a safe, reliable, and effective alternative procedure for the treatment of 4-level CSM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phillips DG (1973) Surgical treatment of myelopathy with cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 36:879–884

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards CC 2nd, Riew KD, Anderson PA et al (2003) Cervical myelopathy: current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Spine J 3:68–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mehdorn HM, Fritsch MJ, Stiller RU (2005) Treatment options and results in cervical myelopathy. Acta Neurochir Suppl 93:177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghogawala Z, Coumans JV, Benzel EC et al (2007) Ventral versus dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgeons’ assessment of eligibility for randomization in a proposed randomized controlled trial: results of a survey of the Cervical Spine Research Society. Spine 32:429–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Konya D, Ozgen S, Gercek A et al (2009) Outcomes for combined anterior and posterior surgical approaches for patients with multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Clin Neurosci 16:404–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herkowitz HN (1988) A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 13:774–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M et al (1992) Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 17:1281–1284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y et al (2003) C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine 28:2447–2451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaptain GL, Simmons NE, Replogle RE et al (2000) Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 93:199–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yalamanchili PK, Vives MJ, Chaudhary SB (2012) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: factors in choosing the surgical approach. Adv Orthop 2012:783762

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirabayashi K, Bohlman HH (1995) Multilevel cervical spondylosis. Laminoplasty versus anterior decompression. Spine 20:1732–1734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. King JT Jr, Roberts MS (2002) Validity and reliability of the Short Form-36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 97:180–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14:409–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B (1958) Cervical disk lesions. J Am Med Assoc 166:23–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K et al (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 26:1890–1894 discussion 1895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koller H, Hempfing A, Ferraris L et al (2007) 4- and 5-level anterior fusions of the cervical spine: review of literature and clinical results. Eur Spine J 16:2055–2071

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin Q, Zhou X, Wang X et al (2012) A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 21:474–481

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sayana MK, Jamil H, Poynton A (2011) Cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Adv Orthop 2011:241729

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y, Hou Y, Yang L et al (2012) Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques in the surgical management of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 37:E1450–E1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson RA, Smith GW (1955) Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for the cervical disc syndrome. Bull John Hopkins Hosp 96:223–224

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 15:602–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim JMS (2004) Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study. Spine 29:845–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bulger RF, Rejowski JE, Beatty RA (1985) Vocal cord paralysis associated with anterior cervical fusion: considerations for prevention and treatment. J Neurosurg 62:657–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Flynn TB (1982) Neurologic complications of anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine 7:536–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Frempong-Boadu A, Houten JK, Osborn B et al (2002) Swallowing and speech dysfunction in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, objective preoperative and postoperative assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kriskovich MD, Apfelbaum RI, Haller JR (2000) Vocal fold paralysis after anterior cervical spine surgery: incidence, mechanism, and prevention of injury. Laryngoscope 110:1467–1473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dalbayrak S, Yilmaz M, Naderi S (2010) “Skip” corpectomy in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg Spine 12:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang HL, Chen GD, Zhang HT et al (2013) Open-door laminoplasty with plate fixation at alternating levels for treatment of multilevel degenerative cervical disease. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:E13–E18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kimura A, Seichi A, Inoue H et al (2011) Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 20:1560–1566

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Woods BI, Hohl J, Lee J et al (2011) Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:688–695

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boakye M, Patil CG, Santarelli J et al (2008) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: complications and outcomes after spinal fusion. Neurosurgery 62:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Imanaka T et al (1996) Anterior cervical plate used in degenerative disease can maintain cervical lordosis. J Spinal Disord 9:470–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Papadopoulos EC, Huang RC, Girardi FP et al (2006) Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: radiographic and clinical results. Spine 31:897–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sevki K, Mehmet T, Ufuk T et al (2004) Results of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior cervical corpectomy and stabilization. Spine 29:2493–2500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hwang SL, Lin CL, Lieu AS et al (2004) Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 1:160–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Flynn TB (1982) Neurologic complications of anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine 7:536–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Frempong-Boadu A, Houten JK, Osborn B et al (2002) Swallowing and speech dysfunction in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, objective preoperative and postoperative assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kriskovich MD, Apfelbaum RI, Haller JR (2000) Vocal fold paralysis after anterior cervical spine surgery: incidence, mechanism, and prevention of injury. Laryngoscope 110:1467–1473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Apfelbaum RI, Kriskovich MD, Haller JR (2000) On the incidence, cause, and prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine 25:2906–2912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mendoza-Lattes S, Clifford K, Bartelt R et al (2008) Dysphagia following anterior cervical arthrodesis is associated with continuous, strong retraction of the esophagus. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kahraman S, Sirin S, Erdogan E et al (2007) Is dysphonia permanent or temporary after anterior cervical approach? Eur Spine J 16:2092–2095

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang JC, Hart RA, Emery SE et al (2003) Graft migration or displacement after multilevel cervical corpectomy and strut grafting. Spine 28:1016–1021 discussion 1021–1022

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hilibrand AS, Fye MA, Emery SE et al (2002) Increased rate of arthrodesis with strut grafting after multilevel anterior cervical decompression. Spine 27:146–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nirala AP, Husain M, Vatsal DK (2004) A retrospective study of multiple interbody grafting and long segment strut grafting following multilevel anterior cervical decompression. Br J Neurosurg 18:227–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishiara H et al (2003) Preventive measures for axial symptoms following cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:497–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y et al (2010) Preservation of muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes rather than subaxial deep extensors reduces adverse effects after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 35:E782–E786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. O’Toole JE, Olson TJ, Kaiser MG (2004) Surgical management of dissociated motor loss following complex cervical spine reconstruction. Spine 29:E56–E60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shuxun Hou, Yantao Zhao or Hongbin Zhong.

Additional information

Z. Li and Z. Guo contributed equally to the manuscript and should be considered co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Z., Guo, Z., Hou, S. et al. Segmental anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with preservation of middle vertebrae in the surgical management of 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 23, 1472–1479 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3208-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3208-z

Keywords

Navigation