Abstract
Background
Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis is a challenging condition for spinal surgeons. Posterior surgery in these cases is complicated by poor anatomical landmarks, scar tissue adhesion of muscle and dural structures and difficult access to the intervertebral disc. Anterior interbody fusion provides an alternative treatment method, allowing indirect foraminal decompression, reliable disc clearance and implantation of large surface area implants.
Materials and methods
A retrospective chart review of patients with iatrogenic spondylolisthesis including pre- and post-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores was performed. Imaging criteria were pelvic incidence, overall lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis. In addition, the fusion rate was investigated after 6 months.
Results
Six consecutive patients treated between 2008 and 2011 (4 female, 2 male, mean age 61 ± 7.1 years) were identified. The initially performed surgeries included decompression with or without discectomy; posterior instrumented and non-instrumented fusion. The olisthetic level was in all cases at the decompressed level. All patients were revised with stand-alone anterior interbody fusion devices at the olisthetic level filled with BMP 2. Average ODI dropped from 49 ± 11 % pre-operatively to 26.0 ± 4.0 at 24 months follow-up. VAS average dropped from 7 ± 1 to 2 ± 0. Mean total lordosis of 39.8 ± 2.8° increased to 48.5 ± 4.9° at pelvic incidences of 48.8 ± 6.8° pre-operatively. Mean segmental lordosis at L4/5 improved from 10.5 ± 6.7° to 19.0 ± 4.9° at 24 months. Mean segmental lordosis in L5/S1 increased from 15.1 ± 7.4° to 23.2 ± 5.6°. Cage subsidence due to severe osteoporosis occurred in one case after 5 months, and hence there was no further follow-up. Fusion was confirmed in all other patients.
Conclusion
Anterior interbody fusion offers good stabilisation and restoration of lordosis in iatrogenic spondylolisthesis and avoids the well-known problems associated with reentering the spinal canal for revision fusions. In this group, ODI and VAS scores were improved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K (1986) Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 11(2):107–110
Lee CK (1983) Lumbar spinal instability (olisthesis) after extensive posterior spinal decompression. Spine 8(4):429–433
Suzuki K, Ishida Y, Ohmori K (1993) Spondylolysis after posterior decompression of the lumbar spine. 35 patients followed for 3-9 years. Acta Orthop Scand 64(1):17–21
Brunet JA, Wiley JJ (1984) Acquired spondylolysis after spinal fusion. J Bone Jt Surg Br 66(5):720–724
Harris RI, Wiley JJ (1963) Acquired spondylolysis as a sequel to spine fusion. J Bone Jt Surg Am 45:1159–1170
Rombold C (1965) Spondylolysis: a complication of spine fusion. J Bone Jt Surg Am 47:1237–1242
Blasier RD, Monson RC (1987) Acquired spondylolysis after posterolateral spinal fusion. J Pediatr Orthop 7(2):215–217
Frymoyer JW, Matteri RE, Hanley EN, Kuhlmann D, Howe J (1978) Failed lumbar disc surgery requiring second operation.A long-term follow-up study. Spine 3(1):7–11
Maurer SG, Wright KE, Bendo JA (2000) Iatrogenic spondylolysis leading to contralateral pedicular stress fracture and unstable spondylolisthesis: a case report. Spine 25(7):895–898
Celik SE, Celik S, Göksu K, Kara A, Ince I (2010) Microdecompressive laminatomy with a 5-year follow-up period for severe lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 23(4):229–235
Hong SW, Choi KY, Ahn Y, Baek OK, Wang JC, Lee SH, Lee HY (2011) A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis. Spine 36(3):E172–E178
Kwon BK, Albert TJ (2005) Adult low-grade acquired spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: evaluation and management. Spine 30(6 Suppl):S35–S41
Deguchi M, Rapoff AJ, Zdeblick TA (1999) Biomechanical comparison of spondylolysis fixation techniques. Spine 24(4):328–333
Zdeblick TA (1999) Discogenic back pain. In: Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Balderston RA et al (eds) The Spine, 4th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 748–765
L’Heureux EA Jr, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Denis F, Lonstein JE (2003) Functional outcome analysis including preoperative and postoperative SF-36 for surgically treated adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 28(12):1269–1274
Jarrett CD, Heller JG, Tsai L (2009) Anterior exposure of the lumbar spine with and without an “access surgeon”: morbidity analysis of 265 consecutive cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 22(8):559–564
Kulkarni SS, Lowery GL, Ross RE, Ravi Sankar K, Lykomitros V (2003) Arterial complications following anterior lumbar interbody fusion: report of eight cases. Eur Spine J 12(1):48–54
König MA, Leung Y, Jürgens S, MacSweeney S, Boszczyk BM (2011) The routine intra-operative use of pulse oximetry for monitoring can prevent severe thromboembolic complications in anterior surgery. Eur Spine J 20(12):2097–2102
Barrick WT, Schofferman JA, Reynolds JB, Goldthwaite ND, McKeehen M, Keaney D, White AH (2000) Anterior lumbar fusion improves discogenic pain at levels of prior posterolateral fusion. Spine 25(7):853–857
Ishihara H, Osada R, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Ohmori K, Kimura T, Matsui H, Tsuji H (2001) Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 14(2):91–99
Meyerding HW (1932) Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 54:371–377
Bisschop A, van Royen BJ, Mullender MG, Paul CP, Kingma I, Jiya TU, van der Veen AJ, van Dieën JH (2012) Which factors prognosticate spinal instability following lumbar laminectomy? Eur Spine J [Epub ahead of print]
Conflict of interest
No benefits or funds in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
König, M.A., Ebrahimi, F.V., Nitulescu, A. et al. Early results of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion in iatrogenic spondylolisthesis patients. Eur Spine J 22, 2876–2883 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2970-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2970-7