Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of our paper is to illustrate our experience with minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of cervical schwannomas. Moreover, a brief review of the literature was conducted.
Methods
All data regarding patients treated for cervical schwannomas were retrospectively revised. Site, size and extension of the lesions and preoperative neurological status were obtained through re-examination of neuroimaging and clinical records. Postoperative clinical examinations and radiological images were available for all patients. The clinical course was documented using the visual analog scale (VAS), Karnofsky score (KPS) and the Klekamp–Samii score system.
Results
Sixteen patients harboring cervical schwannomas were treated from 2003 to 2009. Hemilaminectomy was performed in eight cases, subtotal hemilaminectomy in four cases, interlaminar fenestration in two cases, osteoplastic hemilaminotomy and laminoplasty in one case each. Postoperative neuroimaging revealed complete removal of the lesion and no signs of spinal instability. At discharge, neurological improvement was observed in 14 patients and all patients demonstrated reduction of VAS score and improvement of KPS and Klekamp–Samii’s score.
Conclusions
Minimal access procedures are increasingly gaining popularity but their use is poorly described in the treatment of cervical tumors. Less invasive approaches may effectively be used instead of traditional laminectomy in the treatment of cervical tumors, especially schwannomas, providing less iatrogenic traumatism and preventing postsurgical spinal instability. Modern neuroimaging allows adequate preoperative planning and microsurgical techniques provide adequate execution of the surgical act. The procedure has to be tailored case by case considering the specific lesional features and the individual anatomical situation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasi SS, Senoglu M, Theodore N et al (1998) Microsurgical management of spinal schwannomas: evaluation of 128 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 9:40–47
Alexander E Jr (1985) Postlaminectomy kyphosis. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (eds) Neurosurgery, vol 3. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 2293–2297
Arkin AM, Simon N (1950) Radiation scoliosis: an experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 32:396–401
Aronson DD, Kahn RH, Canady A et al (1991) Instability of the cervical spine after decompression in patients who have Arnold-Chiari malformation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:898–906
Bell DF, Walker JL, O’Connor G et al (1994) Spinal deformity after multiple-level cervical laminectomy in children. Spine 19:406–411
Celli P (2002) Treatment of relevant nerve roots involved in nerve sheath tumors: removal or preservation? Neurosurgery 51:684–692
Cemil B, Tun K, Kaptanoglu E et al (2009) Use of pimecrolimus to prevent epidural fibrosis in a postlaminectomy rat model. J Neurosurg Spine 11:758–763
Cerqui A, Kim DH, Kim SH (2007) Surgical approaches to paraspinal nerve sheath tumors. Neurosurg Focus 22(6):E9
Chiou SM, Eggert HR, Laborde G, Seeger W (1989) Microsurgical unilateral approaches for spinal tumor surgery: eight years’ experience in 256 primary operated patients. Acta Neurochir 100:127–133
Conti P, Pansini G, Mouchaty H (2004) Spinal neurinomas: retrospective analysis and long-term outcome of 179 consecutively operated cases and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 61:35–44
Deutsch H, Haid RW, Rodts GE, Mummaneni PV (2003) Postlaminectomy cervical deformity. Neurosurg Focus 15(3):E5
De Jonge T, Slullitel H, Dubousset J et al (2005) Late-onset spinal deformities in children treated by laminectomy and radiation therapy for malignant tumors. Eur Spine J 14:765–771
Evans AE, Norkool P, Evans I et al (1991) Late effects of treatment for Wilms’ tumor. A report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group. Cancer 67:331–336
Fassett DR, Clark R, Brockmeyer DL, Schmidt MH (2006) Cervical spine deformity associated with resection of spinal cord tumors. Neurosurg Focus 20(2):E2
Fessler RG, O’Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Perez-Cruet MJ (2006) The development of minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurg Clin North Am 17:401–409
Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL (2003) Spinal instability and deformity due to neoplastic conditions. Neurosurg Focus 14(1):8
Guidetti B (1974) Removal of extramedullary benign spinal cord tumors. In: Krayenbuhl II, Brihaje J, Loew F (eds) Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 173–197
Inoue H, Ohmori K, Ishida Y (1996) Long-term follow-up review of suspension laminotomy for cervical compression myelopathy. J Neurosurg 85(5):817–823
Kahanovitz N, Viola K, Gallagher M (1994) Long-term strength assessment of postoperative discectomy patients. Spine 14(4):402–403
Kanaan I, Iqbal J, Sheikh B (1999) Osteoplastic laminotomy as a minimally invasive spine procedure. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 42(2):60–62
Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE et al (2000) Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 93(Suppl 2):199–204
Kato Y, Kaneko K, Kataoka H (2007) Cervical hemilaminoplasty: technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(4):296–301
Katsumi Y, Honma T, Nakamura T (1989) Analysis of cervical instability resulting from laminectomies for removal of spinal cord tumor. Spine 14:1171–1176
Klekamp J, Samii M (1989) Surgery of spinal nerve sheath tumors with special reference to neurofiromatosis. Neurosurgery 42(2):279–289
Koch Wiewrodt D, Wagner W, Perneczy A (2007) Unilateral multilevel interlaminar fenestration instead of laminectomy or hemilaminectomy: an alternative surgical approach to intraspinal space-occupying lesions. Neurosurg Spine 6:485–492
La Rocca H, Macnab I (1974) The laminectomy membrane. Studies in its evolution, characteristics, effects and prophylaxis in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56:545–550
Lonstein JE (1977) Post-laminectomy kyphosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:93–100
Lot G, George B (1997) Cervical neuromas with extradural components: surgical management in a series of 57 patients. Neurosurgery 41(4):813–822
Love JG (1966) Laminectomy for the removal of spinal cord tumors. J Neurosurg 25:116–121
Mikawa Y, Shikata J, Yamamuro T (1987) Spinal deformity and instability after multilevel cervical laminectomy. Spine 12:6–11
Nittner K (1976) Spinal meningiomas, neurinomas and neurofibromas and hourglass tumors. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn Gw (eds) Handbook of clinical neurology, vol 20. Tumors of the Spine and Spinal Cord. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 177–322
Ogilvie J (1985) Spine deformity following radiation therapy. In: Lonstein JE, Bradford DS, Winter RB et al (eds) Moe’s textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities, 3rd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 541–547
O’Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Fessler RG (2006) Minimally invasive approaches to vertebral column and spinal cord tumors. Neurosurg Clin North Am 17:491–506
Pompili A, Caroli F, Cattani F et al (2004) Unilateral limited laminectomy as the approach of choice for the removal of thoracolumbar neurofibromas. Spine 29(15):1698–1702
Raimondi AJ, Gutierrez FA, Di Rocco C (1976) Laminotomy and total reconstruction of the posterior spinal arch for spinal canal surgery in childhood. J Neurosurg 45:555–560
Ratliff JK, Cooper PR (2003) Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg 98(3 Suppl):230–238
Rohde V, Kuker W, Reinges MH, Gilsbach JM (2000) Microsurgical treatment of spontaneous and non-spontaneous spinal epidural haematomas: neurological outcome in relation to aetiology. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 142:787–793
Ross JS, Obuchowski N, Modic MT (1991) ME evaluation of epidural fibrosis: proposed grading system with intra- and interobserver variability. Neurol Res 21:S23–S26
Schwartz TH, McCormick PC (2004) Spinal cord tumors in adults. In: Winn HR (ed) Youmans neurological surgery, vol 4, 5th edn. WB Saunders, Philadephia, pp 4817–4834
Sciubba DM, Chaichana KL, Woodworth GF, McGirt M, Gokaslan ZL, Jallo GI (2008) Factors associated with cervical instability requiring fusion after cervical laminectomy for intradural tumor resection. J Neurosurg Spine 8:413–419
Seppala MT, Haltia MJJ, Sankila RJ, Jaaskelainen JE, Heiskanen O (1995) Long-term outcome after removal of spinal schwannomas: a clinicopathological study of 187 cases. J Neurosurg 83:621–626
Sim FH, Svien HJ, Bickel WH et al (1974) Swan-neck deformity following extensive cervical laminectomy. A review of twenty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:564–580
Tatsui CE, Martinez G, Li X, Pattany P, Levi AD (2006) Evaluation of DuraGenh in preventing peridural fibrosis in rabbits. J Neurosurg Spine 4:51–59
Thiex R, Thron A, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V (2005) Functional outcome after surgical treatment of spontaneous and nonspontaneous spinal subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg Spine 3:12–16
Thontrangan I, Le H, Park J, Kim DH (2004) Minimally invasive spinal surgery: a historical perspective. Neurosurg Focus 16(1):13
Tredway TL, Santiago P, Hrubes MR (2006) Minimally invasive resection of intradural extramedullary spinal neoplasms (2006) Neurosurgery 58[ONS Suppl 1]:ONS-52–ONS-58
Weber BR, Grob D, Dvorak J et al (1997) Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effects on the multifidus muscle. Spine 22(15):1765–1772
Yasuoka S, Peterson HA, MacCarty CS (1982) Incidence of spinal column deformity after multilevel laminectomy in children and adults. J Neurosurg 57:441–445
Yasargil MG, Tranmer BI, Adamson TE, Roth P (1991) Unilateral partial hemi laminectomy for the removal of extra- and intramedullary tumors and AVMs. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 18:113–132
Yeh JS, Sgouros S, Walsh AR, Hockley AD (2001) Spinal sagittal malalignment following surgery for primary intramedullary tumors in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 35(6):318–324
Conflict of interest
The author warrants that her contribution is original and that the research is valid and it is not influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. The author discloses all financial relationships that might bias their work. Potential conflicts do not exist.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dehcordi, S.R., Marzi, S., Ricci, A. et al. Less invasive approaches for the treatment of cervical schwannomas: our experience. Eur Spine J 21, 887–896 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2118-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2118-6