Abstract
Purpose
Spinal schwannomas often require laminectomy for gross total resection. However, laminectomy may not be necessary due to the unique anatomy of epidural schwannomas at the C1-2 level, even with the intradural part. This study aimed to determine the need for laminectomy by comparing factors between patients who underwent laminectomy and those who did not and to identify the benefits of not performing laminectomy.
Methods
Fifty patients with spinal epidural schwannoma confined to C1-C2 level were retrospectively collected and divided into groups based on whether laminectomy was intended and performed. In all cases where laminectomy was conducted, patients underwent laminoplasty using microplate-and-screws, which deviates from the conventional laminectomy approach. Tumor characteristics were compared, and a cut-off value for laminectomy was determined. Outcomes were compared between groups, and factors influencing laminectomy were identified. Postoperative changes in cervical curves were measured.
Results
The diameter of the intradural part of the tumor was significantly longer in the laminectomy performed group, with a 14.86 mm cut-off diameter requiring laminectomy. Recurrence rates did not differ significantly between groups. Surgery time was substantially longer for the laminectomy performed group. No significant changes were observed in Cobb's angles of Oc-C2, C1-C2, and Oc-C1 before and after surgery.
Conclusion
The study showed that the diameter of the intradural part of the tumor influenced the decision to perform laminectomy for removing epidural schwannomas at C1-C2. The cut-off value of the diameter of the intradural part of the tumor for the laminectomy was 14.86 mm. Not performing laminectomy can be a viable option with no significant differences in removal and complication rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- MRI :
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- M :
-
Male
- F :
-
Female
- BMI :
-
Body Mass Index
- ROC :
-
Receiver Operating Characteristic
- F/U :
-
Follow-up
- OP :
-
Operative
References
Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Imura S, Tomita K (1995) Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study. Int Orthop 19:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179972
Bartolomei JC, Crockard HA (2001) Bilateral posterolateral approach to mirror-image C-2 neurofibromas. Report of four cases. J Neurosurg 94:292–298. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2001.94.2.0292
Fehlings MG, Nater A, Zamorano JJ, Tetreault LA, Varga PP, Gokaslan ZL, Boriani S, Fisher CG, Rhines L, Bettegowda C, Kawahara N, Chou D (2016) Risk Factors for Recurrence of Surgically Treated Conventional Spinal Schwannomas: Analysis of 169 Patients From a Multicenter International Database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:390–398. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001232
George B, Lot G (1995) Neurinomas of the first two cervical nerve roots: a series of 42 cases. J Neurosurg 82:917–923. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.82.6.0917
Heller JG, Edwards CC 2nd, Murakami H, Rodts GE (2001) Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1330–1336. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200106150-00013
Jung KW, Park KH, Ha J, Lee SH, Won YJ, Yoo H (2015) Incidence of primary spinal cord, spinal meninges, and cauda equina tumors in Korea, 2006–2010. Cancer Res Treat 47:166–172. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.017
Krishnan P, Behari S, Banerji D, Mehrotra N, Chhabra DK, Jain VK (2004) Surgical approach to C1–C2 nerve sheath tumors. Neurol India 52:319–324
Lee SH, Son DW, Lee JS, Kim DH, Sung SK, Lee SW, Song GS (2018) Differences in Cervical Sagittal Alignment Changes in Patients Undergoing Laminoplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Neurospine 15:91–100. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1834864.432
Lonstein JE (1977) Post-laminectomy kyphosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 93–100
Lot G, George B (1997) Cervical neuromas with extradural components: surgical management in a series of 57 patients. Neurosurgery 41:813–820; discussion 820–812. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199710000-00010
Maeda T, Arizono T, Saito T, Iwamoto Y (2002) Cervical alignment, range of motion, and instability after cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200208000-00016
Pritz MB (1991) Evaluation and treatment of intradural tumours located anterior to the cervicomedullary junction by a lateral suboccipital approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 113:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402118
Riesenburger RI, Klimo P Jr, Yao KC (2011) A fourth atlantoaxial joint: an initial description. Spine J 11:e6-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.02.016
Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee JH, Lee SH, Lim YJ, Kim JS (2007) Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E656-660. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158c573
Sun I, Pamir MN (2017) Non-Syndromic Spinal Schwannomas: A Novel Classification. Front Neurol 8:318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00318
Tish S, Habboub G, Lang M, Ostrom QT, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Recinos PF, Kshettry VR (2019) The epidemiology of spinal schwannoma in the United States between 2006 and 2014. J Neurosurg Spine 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.10.SPINE191025
Yuan W, Zhu Y, Liu X, Zhu H, Zhou X, Zhou R, Cui C, Li J (2015) Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 134:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.004
Welling B, Park YK, Al-Mefty O (1988) Primary extramedullary tumors of the craniovertebral junction. Surgery of Craniovertebral Junction 1st Ed:240–242
Funding
This study did not receive any funding or financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The Institutional Review Board approved the study (IRB Number: H-2303–144-1416). The study adhered to the guidelines specified in the Declaration of Helsinki, and the manuscript followed the STROBE checklist.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, TS., Yuh, W.T., Han, J. et al. Is laminectomy necessary for C1-C2 epidural schwannomas?. Acta Neurochir 165, 3065–3076 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05707-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05707-2