Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Safety, effectiveness and predictors for early reoperation in therapeutic and prophylactic vertebroplasty: short-term results of a prospective case series of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Vertebroplasty (VP) is a cost-efficient alternative to kyphoplasty; however, regarding safety and vertebral body (VB) height restoration, it is considered inferior. We assessed the safety and efficacy of VP in alleviating pain, improving quality of life (QoL) and restoring alignment.

Methods

In a prospective monocenter case series from May 2007 until July 2008, there were 1,408 vertebroplasties performed during 319 interventions in 306 patients with traumatic, lytic and osteoporotic fractures. The 249 interventions in 233 patients performed because of osteoporotic vertebral fractures were analyzed regarding demographics, treatment and radiographic details, pain alleviation (VAS), QoL improvement (NASS and EQ-5D), complications and predictors for new fractures requiring a reoperation.

Results

The osteoporotic patient sample consisted of 76.7% (179) females with a median age of 80 years. A total of 54 males had a median age of 77 years. On average, there were 1.8 VBs fractured and 5 VBs treated. The preoperative pain was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) and decreased from 54.9 to 40.4 pts after 2 months and 31.2 pts after 6 months. Accordingly, the QoL on the EQ-5D measure (−0.6 to 1) improved from 0.35 pts before surgery to 0.56 pts after 2 and to 0.68 pts after 6 months. The preoperative Beck Index (anterior height/posterior height) improved from a mean of 0.64 preoperative to 0.76 postoperative, remained stable at 2 months and slightly deteriorated to 0.72 at 6 months postoperatively. There were cement leakages in 26% of the fractured VBs and in 1.4% of the prophylactically cemented VBs; there were symptoms in 4.3%, and most of them were temporary hypotension and one pulmonary cement embolism that remained asymptomatic. The univariate regression model revealed a tendency for a reduced risk for new or refractures on radiographs (OR = 2.61, 95% CI 0.92–7.38, p = 0.12) and reoperations (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 0.94–8.949, p = 0.1) when prophylactic augmentation was performed. The final multivariate regression model revealed male patients to have an about three times higher refracture risk (radiographic) (OR = 2.78, p = 0.02) at 6 months after surgery. Patients with a lumbar index fracture had an about three to five times higher refracture/reoperation risk than patients with a thoracic (OR = 0.33/0.35, p = 0.009/0.01) or thoracolumbar (OR = 0.32/0.22, p = 0.099/0.01) index fracture.

Conclusion

If routinely used, VP is a safe and efficacious treatment option for osteoporotic vertebral fractures with regard to pain relief and improvement of the QoL. Even segmental realignment can be partially achieved with proper patient positioning. Certain patient or fracture characteristics increase the risk for early radiographic refractures or new fractures, or a reoperation; a consequent prophylactic augmentation showed protective tendencies, but the study was underpowered for a final conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zethraeus N, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Kanis JA, Jonsson B (2008) The cost-effectiveness of the treatment of high risk women with osteoporosis, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 19:819–827. doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0511-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Borgstrom F, Sobocki P, Strom O, Jonsson B (2007) The societal burden of osteoporosis in Sweden. Bone 40:1602–1609. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.02.027

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 26:1511–1515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lau E, Ong K, Kurtz S, Schmier J, Edidin A (2008) Mortality following the diagnosis of a vertebral compression fracture in the Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1479–1486. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heini PF (2005) The current treatment—a survey of osteoporotic fracture treatment. Osteoporotic spine fractures: the spine surgeon’s perspective. Osteoporos Int 16 Suppl 2:S85–S92. doi:10.1007/s00198-004-1723-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roder C, El-Kerdi A, Eggli S, Aebi M (2004) A centralized total joint replacement registry using web-based technologies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2077–2079 (discussion 2079–2080). pii: 86/9/2077

  7. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148. doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650080915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fribourg D, Tang C, Sra P, Delamarter R, Bae H (2004) Incidence of subsequent vertebral fracture after kyphoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2270–2276 discussion 2277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiras J, Depriester C, Weill A, Sola-Martinez MT, Deramond H (1997) Percutaneous vertebral surgery. Technics and indications. J Neuroradiol 24:45–59. pii: MDOI-JN-06-1997-24-1-0150-9861-101019-ART73

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P, Le Gars D (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Technique, indications, and results. Radiol Clin North Am 36:533–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM (2000) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 25:923–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N, Flipo RM, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P, Delcambre B (1999) Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study. J Rheumatol 26:2222–2228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cyteval C, Sarrabere MP, Roux JO, Thomas E, Jorgensen C, Blotman F, Sany J, Taourel P (1999) Acute osteoporotic vertebral collapse: open study on percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement in 20 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1685–1690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, Hardy N, Deramond H, Fardellone P (2000) Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:1410–1414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahn Y, Lee JH, Lee HY, Lee SH, Keem SH (2008) Predictive factors for subsequent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 9:129–136. doi:10.3171/SPI/2008/9/8/129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin WC, Cheng TT, Lee YC, Wang TN, Cheng YF, Lui CC, Yu CY (2008) New vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty: retrospective analysis of risk factors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:225–231. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2007.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB, Licata A, Benhamou L, Geusens P, Flowers K, Stracke H, Seeman E (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323. pii: joc02244

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lindsay R, Burge RT, Strauss DM (2005) One year outcomes and costs following a vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:78–85. doi:10.1007/s00198-004-1646-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Berlemann U (2006) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine 31:1983–2001. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000229254.89952.6b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McKiernan F, Jensen R, Faciszewski T (2003) The dynamic mobility of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:24–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, Venmans A, van Rooij WJ, Schoemaker MC, Juttmann JR, Lo TH, Verhaar HJ, van der Graaf Y, van Everdingen KJ, Muller AF, Elgersma OE, Halkema DR, Fransen H, Janssens X, Buskens E, Mali WP (2010) Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 376:1085–1092. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Francis RM, Aspray TJ, Hide G, Sutcliffe AM, Wilkinson P (2008) Back pain in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 19:895–903. doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0530-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gill JB, Kuper M, Chin PC, Zhang Y, Schutt R Jr (2007) Comparing pain reduction following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Physician 10:583–590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eck JC, Nachtigall D, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (2008) Comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the literature. Spine J 8:488–497. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kasperk C, Hillmeier J, Noldge G, Grafe IA, Dafonseca K, Raupp D, Bardenheuer H, Libicher M, Liegibel UM, Sommer U, Hilscher U, Pyerin W, Vetter M, Meinzer HP, Meeder PJ, Taylor RS, Nawroth P (2005) Treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. J Bone Miner Res 20:604–612. doi:10.1359/JBMR.041203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Voormolen MH, Mali WP, Lohle PN, Fransen H, Lampmann LE, van der Graaf Y, Juttmann JR, Jansssens X, Verhaar HJ (2007) Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with optimal pain medication treatment: short-term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The VERTOS study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:555–560. pii: 28/3/555

    Google Scholar 

  27. Edidin AA, Ong KL, Lau E, Kurtz SM (2011) Mortality risk for operated and non-operated vertebral fracture patients in the medicare population. J Bone Miner Res. doi:10.1002/jbmr.353

  28. Roder C, Bach B, Berry DJ, Eggli S, Langenhahn R, Busato A (2010) Obesity, age, sex, diagnosis, and fixation mode differently affect early cup failure in total hip arthroplasty: a matched case–control study of 4420 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1954–1963. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roder C, Parvizi J, Eggli S, Berry DJ, Muller ME, Busato A (2003) Demographic factors affecting long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res:62–73. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000096812.78689.f0

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thankfully acknowledge the sponsoring of the study by a generous grant from AOSpine International and their framework program on fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone (FFOB).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Service Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Peter Diel, Lorenz Freiburghaus, Christoph Röder, Lorin Michael Benneker & Paul Ferdinand Heini

  2. Osteoporosis Policlinic Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Albrecht Popp

  3. Institute for Evaluative Research in Medicine, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014, Bern, Switzerland

    Peter Diel, Christoph Röder & Gosia Perler

Authors
  1. Peter Diel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenz Freiburghaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christoph Röder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lorin Michael Benneker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Albrecht Popp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gosia Perler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Paul Ferdinand Heini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Röder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diel, P., Freiburghaus, L., Röder, C. et al. Safety, effectiveness and predictors for early reoperation in therapeutic and prophylactic vertebroplasty: short-term results of a prospective case series of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J 21 (Suppl 6), 792–799 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1989-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1989-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation