Abstract
Transpedicular screw fixation has been accepted worldwide since Harrington et al. first placed pedicle screws through the isthmus. In vivo and in vitro studies indicated that pedicle screw insertion accuracy could be significantly improved with image-assisted systems compared with conventional approaches. The O-arm is a new generation intraoperative imaging system designed without compromise to address the needs of a modern OR like no other system currently available. The aim of our study was to check the accuracy of O-arm based and S7-navigated pedicle screw implants in comparison to free-hand technique described by Roy-Camille at the lumbar and sacral spine using CT scans. The material of this study was divided into two groups, free-hand group (group I) (30 patients; 152 screws) and O-arm group (37 patients; 187 screws). The patients were operated upon from January to September 2009. Screw implantation was performed during PLIF or TLIF mainly for spondylolisthesis, osteochondritis and post-laminectomy syndrome. The accuracy rate in our work was 94.1% in the free-hand group compared to 99% in the O-arm navigated group. Thus it was concluded that free-hand technique will only be safe and accurate when it is in the hands of an experienced surgeon and the accuracy of screw placement with O-arm can reach 100%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 25:606–614
Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J, Malms J, Steinbeck J, Blasius S (1996) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 21:1320–1324
Choi WW, Green BA, Levi AD (2000) Computer assisted fluoroscopic targeting system for pedicle screw insertion. Neurosurgery 47:872–878
Fu TS, Wong CB, Tsai TT, Liang YC, Chen LH, Chen WJ (2008) Pedicle screw insertion: computed tomography versus fluoroscopic image guidance. Int Orthop 32:517–521
Harrington PR, Tullos HS (1969) Reduction of severe spondylolisthesis in children. South Med J 62:1–7
Karatoprak O, Unay K, Tezer M, Ozturk C, Aydogan M, Mirzanli C (2008) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Int Orthop 32:523–528
Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235–240
Laine T, Makitalo K, Schlenzka D, Tallroth K, Poussa M, Alho A (1997) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J 6:402–405
Laine T, Schlenzka D, Makitalo K, Tallroth K, Nolte LP, Visarius H (1997) Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer assisted surgery. A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine 22:1254–1258
Learch TJ, Massie JB, Pathria MN, Ahlgren BA, Garfin SR (2004) Assessment of pedicle screw placement utilizing conventional radiography and computed tomography: a proposed systematic approach to improve accuracy of interpretation. Spine 29:767–773
Lee TC, Yang LC, Liliang PC, Su TM, Rau CS, Chen HJ (2004) Single versus separate registration for computer assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement. Spine 29:1585–1589
Lim MR, Girardi FP, Zoon SC, Huang RC, Cammisa FP (2005) Accuracy of computerized frameless stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spines. Spine 30:1793–1898
Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittel L, Coulomb M, Lavallee S, Sautot P (1998) Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:39–48
Merloz P, Troccaz J, Vouillat H, Vasile C, Tonetti J, Eid A, Plaweski S (2007) Fluoroscopy based navigation system in spine surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 221(7):813–820
Nottmeier EW, Seemer W, Young PM (2009) Placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using three-dimensional image guidance: experience in a large patient cohort. J Neurosurg Spine 10:33–39
Roy-Camille R (1970) Osteosynthesis du rachis dorsal, lombaire et lombo-sacre par plaques metalliques vissees dans les pedicules vertebraux et les apophyses articulaires. Presse Med 578:1447
Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Berteaux D, Salgado V (1976) Osteosynthesis of thoraco-lumbar spine fractures with metal plates screwed through the vertebral pedicles. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 15:2–16
Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C (1986) Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:7–17
Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Nakamura H, Katayama Y, Imagama S, Ito Z, Ishiguro N (2008) Segmental pedicle screwing for idiopathic scoliosis using computer-assisted surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:181–186
Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ, Cho KH, Oh JH (1994) Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 18:341–346
Tian NF, Xu HZ (2009) Image guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 33:895–903
Wendl K, von Recum J, Wentzensen A, Gruetzner PA (2003) Iso-C (3 D-assisted) navigated implantation of pedicle screws in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Unfallchirug 106:907–913
Wiesner L, Kothe R, Ruther W (1999) Anatomic evaluation of two different techniques for the percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine. Spine 24:1599–1603
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silbermann, J., Riese, F., Allam, Y. et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 20, 875–881 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1683-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1683-4