Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar herniated disc is influenced by the level of concomitant preoperative low back pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decompression surgery is a common and generally successful treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, clinical practice raises some concern that the presence of concomitant low back pain (LBP) may have a negative influence on the overall outcome of treatment. This prospective study sought to examine on how the relative severity of LBP influences the outcome of decompression surgery for LDH. The SSE Spine Tango System was used to acquire the data from 308 patients. Inclusion criteria were LDH, first-time surgery, maximum 1 affected level, and decompression as the only procedure. Before and 12 months after surgery, patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI; includes 0–10 leg/buttock pain (LP) and LBP scales); at 12 months, global outcome was rated on a Likert scale and dichotomised into “good” and “poor” groups. In the “good” outcome group, mean baseline LP was 2.8 (SD 3.1) points higher than LBP; in the “poor” group, the corresponding value was 1.1 (SD 2.9) (p < 0.001 between groups). Significantly fewer patients with back pain as their “main problem” had a good outcome (69% good) when compared with those who reported leg/buttock pain (84% good) as the main problem (p = 0.04). In multivariate regression analyses (controlling for age, gender, co-morbidity), baseline LBP intensity was a significant predictor of the 12-month COMI score, and of the global outcome (each p < 0.05) (higher LBP, worse outcome). In conclusion, patients with more back pain showed significantly worse outcomes after decompression surgery for LDH. This finding fits with general clinical experience, but has rarely been quantified in the many predictor studies conducted to date. Consideration of the severity of concomitant LBP in LDH may assist in establishing realistic patient expectations before the surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Awad JN, Moskovich R (2006) Lumbar disc herniations: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:183–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barth M, Diepers M, Weiss C, Thome C (2008) Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benoist M (2002) The natural history of lumbar disc herniation and radiculopathy. Joint Bone Spine 69:155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chin KR, Tomlinson DT, Auerbach JD, Shatsky JB, Deirmengian CA (2008) Success of lumbar microdiscectomy in patients with Modic changes and low-back pain: a prospective pilot study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Evers AW (2006) A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 15:527–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jansson KA, Nemeth G, Granath F, Jonsson B, Blomqvist P (2005) Health-related quality of life in patients before and after surgery for a herniated lumbar disc. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:959–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jonsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, Stromqvist B (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 22:2938–2944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Junge A, Frohlich M, Ahrens S, Hasenbring M, Sandler A, Grob D, Dvorak J (1996) Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years’ follow up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1056–1064 (discussion 1064–1065)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kagaya H, Takahashi H, Sugawara K, Kuroda T, Takahama M, Haro H, Maekawa S, Hamada Y, Epstein NE, Hood DC (2005) Quality of life assessment before and after lumbar disc surgery. J Orthop Sci 10:486–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleinstuck FS, Grob D, Lattig F, Bartanusz V, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, O’Riordan D, Mannion AF (2009) The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1198–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kosteljanetz M, Espersen JO, Halaburt H, Miletic T (1984) Predictive value of clinical and surgical findings in patients with lumbago-sciatica. A prospective study (Part I). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 73:67–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Magnaes B (1999) Surgical treatment of low back pain. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 119:1773–1777

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mannion AF, Elfering A (2006) Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S93–S108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D (2009) Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1590–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück F, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 1. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18:367–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsui H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Kitagawa H, Nakamura H, Tsuji H (1997) Clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of compressed lumbar nerve roots. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2100–2105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer HM (2005) The delayed OP-indications for surgery of lumbar disc herniations. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:287–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nykvist F, Alaranta H, Hurme M, Karppi SL (1991) Clinical findings as outcome predictors in rehabilitation of patients with sciatica. Int J Rehabil Res 14:131–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pearson AM, Blood EA, Frymoyer JW, Herkowitz H, Abdu WA, Woodward R, Longley M, Emery SE, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Weinstein JN (2008) SPORT lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and back pain: does treatment, location, or morphology matter? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:428–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Peul WC, Arts MP, Brand R, Koes BW (2009) Timing of surgery for sciatica: subgroup analysis alongside a randomized trial. Eur Spine J 18:538–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Postacchini F, Giannicola G, Cinotti G (2002) Recovery of motor deficits after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1040–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rothoerl RD, Woertgen C, Brawanski A (2002) When should conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation be ceased and surgery considered? Neurosurg Rev 25:162–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saal JA (1996) Natural history and nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2S–9S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wai EK, Howse K, Pollock JW, Dornan H, Vexler L, Dagenais S (2009) The reliability of determining “leg dominant pain”. Spine J 9:447–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Waris E, Eskelin M, Hermunen H, Kiviluoto O, Paajanen H (2007) Disc degeneration in low back pain: a 17-year follow-up study using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:681–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T, Deyo RA (2006) Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA 296:2451–2459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J (2008) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2789–2800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:652–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland

    F. S. Kleinstueck, T. Fekete, D. Jeszenszky, A. F. Mannion, D. Grob, F. Lattig, U. Mutter & F. Porchet

Authors
  1. F. S. Kleinstueck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Fekete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Jeszenszky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. F. Mannion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Grob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Lattig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. U. Mutter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. F. Porchet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. S. Kleinstueck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinstueck, F.S., Fekete, T., Jeszenszky, D. et al. The outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar herniated disc is influenced by the level of concomitant preoperative low back pain. Eur Spine J 20, 1166–1173 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1670-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1670-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation