Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disorders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with cage alone (ACDF-C) is associated with a significant incidence of subsidence, local kyphosis, and migration. The use of concurrent plate augmentation may decrease the incidence of these complications while improving the fusion rate. The purpose of the study is to present our results with ACDF with cage and plate augmentation (ACDF-CPA) and to compare these results to previous reports of outcomes following ACDF-C. We evaluated the radiologic and clinical parameters of 83 patients (266 fusion sites) who had an ACDF-CPA between March 2002 and May 2006. Radiologic parameters included fusion rate, fusion time, fusion type, site of pseudoarthrosis and rate and degree of subsidence. Clinical parameters included complications and overall outcomes assessed with Robinson’s criteria; 79 of 83 patients showed bony fusion (95.1%) at last follow-up postoperatively, and there was no significant difference in fusion rate between the number of fusion levels. Type I (pseudoarthrosis) was noticed in 9 patients (12 fusion sites), type II in 14 (19 fusion sites), and type III in 60 (235 fusion sites). Five type I and all type II fusions converged into type III by the last follow-up; 76 of 83 patients (91.6%) experienced good clinical outcomes. Pseudoarthrosis occurred more commonly in more proximal locations, and the subsidence rate was significantly greater in two-level fusions when compared with single-level fusions (P = 0.046). There were four metal-related complications. Plate augmentation in one- or two-level anterior cervical fusions for degenerative cervical spine disorders may improve fusion rates and reduce subsidence and complication rates, resulting in improved clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Celik SE, Kara A, Celik S (2007) A comparison of changes over time in cervical foraminal height after tricortical iliac graft or polyetheretherketone cage placement following anterior discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 6:10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Demircan MN, Kutlay AM, Colak A, Kaya S, Tekin T, Kibici K, Ungoren K (2007) Multilevel cervical fusion without plates, screws or autogenous iliac crest bone graft. J Clin Neurosci 14:723–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shad A, Leach JC, Teddy PJ, Cadoux-Hudson TA (2005) Use of the Solis cage and local autologous bone graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: early technical experience. J Neurosurg Spine 2:116–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie Y, Chopin D, Hardouin P, Lu J (2006) Clinical, radiological and histological study of the failure of cervical interbody fusions with bone substitutes. Eur Spine J 15:1196–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buttermann GR (2008) Prospective nonrandomized comparison of an allograft with bone morphogenic protein versus an iliac-crest autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J 8:426–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao JC, Niu CC, Chen WJ, Chen LH (2008) Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with cancellous allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Int Orthop 32:643–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC (2004) Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages. Surg Neurol 62:378–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho DY, Liau WR, Lee WY, Liu JT, Chiu CL, Sheu PC (2002) Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease. Neurosurgery 51:1343–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gercek E, Arlet V, Delisie J, Marchesi D (2003) Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning. Eur Spine J 12:513–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulkarni AG, Hee HT, Wong HK (2007) Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence. Spine J 7:205–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SH, Seok KS, Lee JH et al (2009) Outcome analysis of single level anterior cervical fusion using interbody PEEK cage with autologous bone graft. J Korean Orthop Assoc 44:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Valvruch, Rune H, Davood J et al (2002) A prospective randomized comparison between the Cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine. Spine 27:1694–1701

  13. Mastrolnardi L, Ducati A, Ferrante L (2006) Anterior cervical fusion with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Preliminary observation in 36 consecutive cases with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meier U, Kemmesies D (2004) Experiences with six different intervertebral disc spacers for spondylodesis of the cervical spine. Orthopade 33:1290–1299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barsa P, Suchomel P (2007) Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion. Eur Spine J 16:1395–1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmieder K, Wolzik-Grossmann M, Pechlivanis I, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Harders A (2006) Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervial interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg Spine 4:447–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim KS, Yang TK, Lee JC (2005) The Radiologic changes in the bone fusion site after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using carbon cages impacted with laminar bone chips: follow-up study over more than 4 years. Spine 30:655–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson RA, Smith GW (1955) Anterolateral cervical disk removal and interbody fusion for cervical disk syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 96:223–224

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine 27:2453–2458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Jonbergen HP, Spruit M, Anderson PG, Pavlov PW (2005) Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence. Spine J 5:645–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Song KJ, Lee KB (2006) A preliminary study of the use of cage and plating for single-segment fusion in degenerative cervical spine disease. J Clin Neurosci 13:181–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Emery SE, Bolesta MJ, Banks MA, Jones PK (1994) Robinson anterior cervical fusion comparison of the standard and modified techniques. Spine 19:660–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang JC, McDonough PW, Kanim LE, Endow KK, Delamarter RB (2001) Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 26:643–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Papadopoulos EC, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Synnott K, Cammisa FP (2006) Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: radiographic and clinical results. Spine 8:897–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS (1995) Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity: a statistical evaluation. Spine 20:1055–1060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Keller EE, Triplett WW (1987) Iliac bone graft: review of 60 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:11–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Summers BN, Eisenstein SM (1989) Donor site pain from the ilium: a complication of lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 71:677–680

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pitzen T, Kiefer R, Munchen D, Barbier D, Reith W, Steudel WI (2006) Filling a cervical spine cage with local autograft: change of bone density and assessment of bony fusion. Zentralbl Neurochir 67:8–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea

    Kyung-Jin Song, Gyu-Hyung Kim & Ji-Hoon Song

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Cyrus E. Taghavi & Margaret S. Hsu

  3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, 154, Samdo-2 Dong, Jeju-shi, Jeju-do, South Korea

    Kwang-Bok Lee

Authors
  1. Kyung-Jin Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cyrus E. Taghavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Margaret S. Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kwang-Bok Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gyu-Hyung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ji-Hoon Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang-Bok Lee.

Additional information

This study was performed by the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Jeju National University Research Council (IRB-2008-29).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, KJ., Taghavi, C.E., Hsu, M.S. et al. Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disorders. Eur Spine J 19, 1677–1683 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1283-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1283-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation