Abstract
Although Schmorl’s nodes (SNs) are a common phenomenon in the normal adult population, their prevalence is controversial and etiology still debatable. The objective was to establish the spatial distribution of SNs along the spine in order to reveal its pathophysiology. In this study, we examined 240 human skeleton spines (T4-L5) (from the Hamann–Todd Osteological Collection) for the presence and location of SNs. To determine the exact position of SNs, each vertebral body surface was divided into 13 zones and 3 areas (anterior, middle, posterior). Our results show that SNs appeared more frequently in the T7-L1 region. The total number of SNs found in our sample was 511: 193 (37.7%) were located on the superior surface and 318 (62.3%) on the inferior surface of the vertebral body. SNs were more commonly found in the middle part of the vertebral body (63.7%). No association was found between the SNs location along the spine and gender, ethnicity and age. This study suggests that the frequency distribution of SNs varies with vertebra location and surface. The results do not lend support to the traumatic or disease explanation of the phenomenon. SNs occurrences are probably associated with the vertebra development process during early life, the nucleus pulposus pressing the weakest part of the end plate in addition to the various strains on the vertebrae and the intervertebral disc along the spine during spinal movements (especially torsional movements).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McFadden KD, Taylor JR (1989) End-plate lesions of the lumbar spine. Spine 14:867–869
Resnick D, Niwayama G (1978) Intervertebral disc herniations: cartilaginous (Schmorl’s) nodes. Radiology 126:57–65
Hamanishi C, Kawabata T, Yosii T, Tanaka S (1994) Schmorl’s nodes on magnetic resonance imaging. Their incidence and clinical relevance. Spine 19:450–453
Wu HT, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME (2006) Edematous Schmorl’s nodes on thoracolumbar MR imaging: characteristic patterns and changes over time. Skeletal Radiol 35:212–219
Stäbler A, Bellan M, Weiss M, Gärtner C, Brossmann J, Reiser MF (1997) MR imaging of enhancing intraosseous disk herniation (Schmorl’s nodes). Am J Roentgenol 168:933–938
Faccia KJ, Williams RC (2008) Schmorl’s nodes: clinical significance and implications for the bioarcheological record. Int J Osteoarchaeol 18:28–44
Hilton RC, Ball J, Benn RT (1976) Vertebral end-plate lesions (Schmorl’s nodes) in the dorsolumbar spine. Ann Rheum Dis 35:127–132
Saluja G, Fitzpatrick K, Bruce M, Cross J (1986) Schmorl’s nodes (intervertebral herniations of intervertebral disc tissue) in two historic British populations. J Anat 145:87–96
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurements of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Schmorl G, Junghanns H (1971) The Human Spine in Health and Disease (2nd American edition translated and edited by Besemann EF). Grune and Stratton, New York
Hansson T, Roos B (1983) The amount of bone mineral and Schmorl’s nodes in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 8:266–271
Frymoyer JW, Newberg A, Pope MH, Wilder DG, Clements J, MacPherson B (1984) Spine radiographs in patients with low-back pain. An epidemiological study in men. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1048–1055
Dar G, Peleg S, Masharawi M, Steinberg N, May H, Hershkovitz I (2009) Demographical aspects of Schmorl’s nodes—a skeletal study. Spine 34:E312–E315
Pfirrmann CW, Resnick D (2001) Schmorl nodes of the thoracic and lumbar spine: radiographic-pathologic study of prevalence, characterization, and correlation with degenerative changes of 1, 650 spinal levels in 100 cadavers. Radiology 219:368–374
Williams FM, Manek NJ, Sambrook PN, Spector TD, Macgregor AJ (2007) Schmorl’s nodes: common, highly heritable, and related to lumbar disc disease. Arthritis Rheum 57:855–860
Owsley DW, Orser CE Jr, Mann RW, Moore-Jansen PH, Montgomery RL (1987) Demography and pathology of an urban slave population from New Orleans. Am J Phys Anthropol 74:185–197
Edwards WT, Zheng Y, Ferrara LA, Yuan HA (2001) Structural features and thickness of the vertebral cortex in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 26:218–225
Kapandji AI (2008) The Physiology of the Joints. vol III. The vertebral column, pelvic girdle and head, 6th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York
Duan Y, Seeman E, Turner CH (2001) The biomechanical basis of vertebral body fragility in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 16:2276–2283
Cvijetić S, McCloskey E, Korsić M (2000) Vertebral osteophytosis and vertebral deformities in an elderly population sample. Wien Klin Wochenschr 112(9):407–412
Gray H (1995) Gray’s anatomy, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York
Moore K, Persuad T (2003) The developing human: clinically oriented embryology, 7th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
Hongo M, Abe E, Shimada Y, Murai H, Ishikawa N, Sato K (1994) Surface strain distribution on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae under axial compression. The role in burst fractures. Spine 24:1197–1202
Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF (2001) Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine 26:889–896
Gracovetsky S, Farfan H (1986) The optimum spine. Spine 11:543–573
Gregersen GG, Lucas DB (1967) An in vivo study of the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:247–262
Tribus CB (1998) Scheuermann’s kyphosis in adolescents and adults: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6:36–43
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Prof. Bruce Latimer, Mr. Lyman Jellema from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, Ohio, for their support and assistance in using the invaluable Hamann-Todd osteological collection; to Mrs. Phyllis Curchack Kornspan for her editorial services; The Dan David Foundation, The Tassia and Dr. Joseph Meychan Chair of History and Philosophy of Medicine, and the Israel Science Foundation for their financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dar, G., Masharawi, Y., Peleg, S. et al. Schmorl’s nodes distribution in the human spine and its possible etiology. Eur Spine J 19, 670–675 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1238-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1238-8