Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of conservative treatment of cervical spine injuries

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conservative treatment still has an important role to play, despite the increasing possibilities of surgical treatment. Treatment starts at the site of trauma. Transportation and immobilisation in braces are discussed. Skeletal skull traction can be used for realignment and reduction, and eventually used in halo-vest treatment. The advantages and disadvantages of these different treatment options are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Botte JM, Garfin SR, Byrne TP, Woo SL, Nickel VL (1989) The halo skeletal fixator. Clin Orthop Relat Res 239:12–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dormans JP, Criscitiello AA, Drummond DS, Davidson RS (1995) Complications in children managed with immobilization in a halo vest. J Bone Joint Surg 77-A(9):1370–1373

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grant GA, Mirza SK, Chapman JR, Winn HR, Newell DW, Jones DT, Grady MS (1999) Risk of early closed reduction in cervical spine subluxation injuries. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 90:13–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson RM, Hart DL, Simmons EF, Ramsby GR, Southwick WO (1977) Cervical orthoses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 59-A:3

    Google Scholar 

  5. Letts M, Girouard L, Yeadon A (1997) Mechanical evaluation of four-versus eight pin halo fixation. J Pediatr Orthop 17:121–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Flanders AE, Balderston RA, Northrup BE, Cotler JM (1999) Magnetic resonance evaluation of the intervertebral disc, spinal ligaments, and spinal cord before and after closed traction reduction of cervical spine dislocations. Spine 15 24(12):1210–1217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Sint-Trudo, Diestersteenweg 100, 3800, Sint-Truiden, Belgium

    Philippe Lauweryns

  2. Department of Morphology, Hasselt University, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium

    Philippe Lauweryns

Authors
  1. Philippe Lauweryns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Lauweryns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauweryns, P. Role of conservative treatment of cervical spine injuries. Eur Spine J 19 (Suppl 1), 23–26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1116-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1116-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation