Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cervical pedicle screw placement: feasibility and accuracy of two new insertion techniques based on morphometric data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This morphometric and experimental study was designed to assess the dimensions and axes of the subaxial cervical pedicles and to compare the accuracy of two different techniques for subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using newly designed aiming devices. Transpedicular fixation is increasingly used for stabilizing the subaxial cervical spine. Development of the demanding technique is based on morphometric studies of the pedicle anatomy. Several surgical techniques have been developed and evaluated with respect to their feasibility and accuracy. The study was carried out on six conserved human cadavers (average age 85 years). Axes and dimensions of the pedicles C3–C7 (60 pedicles) were measured using multislice computed tomography (CT) images prior to surgery. Two groups consisting of 3 specimens and 30 pedicles each were established according to the screw placement technique. For surgical technique 1 (ST1) a para-articular mini-laminotomy was performed. Guidance of the drill through the pedicle with a handheld aiming device attached onto the medial aspect of the pedicle inside the spinal canal. Screw hole preparation monitored by lateral fluoroscopy. In surgical technique 2 (ST2) a more complex aiming device was used for screw holes drilling. It consists of a frame with a fully adjustable radiolucent arm for carrying the instruments necessary for placing the screws. The arm was angled according to the cervical pedicle axis as determined by the preoperative CT scans. Drilling was monitored by lateral fluoroscopy. In either technique 3.5 mm screws made of carbon fiber polyetheretherketone (CF-PEEK) were inserted. The use of the CF-PEEK screws allowed for precise postoperative CT-assessment since this material does not cause artifacts. Screw placement was qualified from ideal to unacceptable into four grades: I = screw centered in pedicle; IIa = perforation of pedicle wall less than one-fourth of the screw diameter; IIb = perforation more than one-fourth of the screw diameter without contact to neurovascular structures; III = screw more than one-fourth outside the pedicle with contact to neurovascular structures. Fifty-six pedicle screws could be evaluated according to the same CT protocol that was used preoperatively. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement did not reveal significant differences between techniques 1 and 2. A tendency towards less severe misplacements (grade III) was seen in ST2 (15% in ST2 vs. 23% in ST1) as well as a higher rate of screw positions graded IIa (62% in ST2 vs. 43% in ST1). C4 and C5 were identified to be the most critical vertebral levels with three malpositioned screws each. Because of the variability of cervical pedicles preoperative CT evaluation with multiplanar reconstructions of the pedicle anatomy is essential for transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine. Cadaver studies remain mandatory to develop safer and technically less demanding procedures. A similar study is projected to further develop the technique of CPS fixation with regard to safety and clinical practicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ICOTEC AG, Altstaetten, Switzerland

  2. Definition “lateral vertebral notch”: most medial part of the ridge of the pars interarticularis located on the lateral mass [23]

  3. Due to the fact that the PSA as measured in the CT reconstructions refers to the lower endplate of the individual vertebral body at every level, the direction of the respective lower endplate had to be determined by lateral fluoroscopy at first.

References

  1. Abumi K, Kaneda K (1997) Pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic lesions of the cervical spine. Spine 22(16):1853–1863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abumi K, Ito M, Taneichi H, Kaneda K (1994) Transpedicular screw fixation for traumatic lesions of the middle and lower cervical spine: description of the techniques and preliminary report. J Spinal Disord 7:19–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abumi K, Kaneda K, Shono Y, Fujiya M (1999) One-stage posterior decompression and reconstruction of the cervical spine by using pedicle screw fixation systems. J Neurosurg 90(1 Suppl):19–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abumi K, Takada T, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M (1999) Posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems. Spine 24(14):1425–1434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abumi K, Shono Y, Ito M, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Kaneda K (2000) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine 25(8):962–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Albert TJ, Klein GR, Joffe D, Vaccaros AR (1998) Use of cervicothoracic junction pedicle screws for reconstruction of complex cervical spine pathology. Spine 23:1596–1599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Albert TJ, Klein GR, Vaccaro AR (1999) Image-guided anterior cervical corpectomy. A feasibility study. Spine 24(8):826–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrey C, Cotton F, Jund J, Mertens P, Perrin G (2003) Transpedicular screwing of the seventh cervical vertebra: anatomical considerations and surgical technique. Surg Radiol Anat 25(5–6):354–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blauth M, Duschek R, Schmidt U (1994) Gerät zur Reposition und intraoperativen Lagerung instabiler Verletzungen der Halswirbelsäule. Operat Orthop Traumatol 6(4):285–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Borne GM, Bedou GL, Pinaudeau M (1984) Treatment of pedicular fractures of the axis. A clinical study and screw fixation technique. J Neurosurg 60(1):88–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bozbuga M, Ozturk A, Ari Z, Sahinoglu K, Bayraktar B, Cecen A (2004) Morphometric evaluation of subaxial cervical vertebrae for surgical application of transpedicular screw fixation.Spine 29(17):1876–1880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choueka J, Spivak JM, Kummer FJ, Steger T (1996) Flexion failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Influence of insertion technique and position. Spine 21(4):462–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Knight T, Yeasting RA (1997) Morphometric evaluation of lower cervical pedicle and its projection. Spine 22(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V (1993) Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine 18(15):2231–2238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fehlings MG, Cooper PR, Errico TJ (1994) Posterior plates in the management of cervical instability: long-term results in 44 patients. J Neurosurg 81(3):341–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hardy RW Jr (1995) The posterior surgical approach to the cervical spine. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 5(3):481–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heller JG, Carlson GD, Abitbol JJ, Garfin SR (1991) Anatomic comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques for screw placement in the lower cervical spine. Spine 16(10 Suppl):S552–S557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heller JG, Silcox DH III, Sutterlin CE III (1995) Complications of posterior cervical plating. Spine 20(22):2442–2448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeanneret B, Gebhard JS, Magerl F (1994) Transpedicular screw fixation of articular mass fracture-separation: results of an anatomical study and operative technique. J Spinal Disord 7(3):222–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, Hutton WC (1997) Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine 22(9):977–982

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamimura M, Ebara S, Itoh H, Tateiwa Y, Kinoshita T, Takaoka K (2000) Cervical pedicle screw insertion: assessment of safety and accuracy with computer-assisted image guidance. J Spinal Disord 13(3):218–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Karaikovic EE, Daubs MD, Madsen RW, Gaines RW Jr (1997) Morphologic characteristics of human cervical pedicles. Spine 22(5):493–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Karaikovic EE, Kunakornsawat S, Daubs MD, Madsen TW, Gaines RW Jr (2000) Surgical anatomy of the cervical pedicles: landmarks for posterior cervical pedicle entrance localization. J Spinal Disord 13(1):63–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Karaikovic EE, Yingsakmongkol W, Gaines RW Jr (2001) Accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement using the funnel technique. Spine 26(22):2456–2462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim HS, Heller JG, Hudgins PA, Fountain JA (2003) The accuracy of computed tomography in assessing cervical pedicle screw placement. Spine 28(21):2441–2446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Abumi K, McAfee PC (1994) Biomechanical analysis of cervical stabilization systems. An assessment of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine. Spine 19(22):2529–2539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Minami A (2003) Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg 99(3 Suppl):257–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kothe R, O’Holleran JD, Liu W, Panjabi MM (1996) Internal architecture of the thoracic pedicle. An anatomic study. Spine 21(3):264–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kothe R, Ruther W, Schneider E, Linke B (2004) Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. Spine 29(17):1869–1875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kowalski JM, Ludwig SC, Hutton WC, Heller JG (2000) Cervical spine pedicle screws: a biomechanical comparison of two insertion techniques. Spine 25(22):2865–2867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ (1999) Transpedicle screw fixation of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop 359:77–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ludwig SC, Kowalski JM, Edwards CC, Heller JG (2000) Cervical pedicle screws: comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine 25(20):2675–2681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA, Vaccaro AR, Foley KF, Albert TJ (2000) Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine 25(13):1655–1667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller RM, Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1996) Anatomic consideration of transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine. An analysis of two approaches. Spine 21(20):2317–2322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, Rothman SL, Widell EH Jr (1989) Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 14(4):367–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nolte LP, Zamorano L, Visarius H, Berlemann U et al (1995) Clinical evaluation of a system for precision enhancement in spine surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 10(6):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nolte LP, Zamorano LJ, Jiang Z, Wang Q, Langlotz F, Berlemann U (1995) Image-guided insertion of transpedicular screws. A laboratory set-up. Spine 20(4):497–500

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K (1991) Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 16(8):861–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Panjabi MM, Shin EK, Chen NC, Wang JL (2000) Internal morphology of human cervical pedicles. Spine 25(10):1197–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Reichle E, Sellenschloh K, Morlock M, Eggers C (2002) Placement of pedicle screws using different navigation systems. A laboratory trial with 12 spinal preparations. Orthopade 31(4):368–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Richter M, Mattes T, Cakir B (2004) Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine. Eur Spine J 13(1):50–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Roh JS, Teng AL, Rice JA et al (2004) In: 32nd annual meeting, C_Ped III. Cervical Spine Research Society (ed) Paper #16: Accurate pedicle screw placement using laser-guided fluoroscopy: the “Perfect Pedicle” technique, vol 16. Cervical Spine Research Society, Boston, p 69

  43. Roy-Camille R, Salient G, Mazel C (1989) Internal fixation of the unstable cervical spine by a posterior osteosynthesis with plates and screws. In: The Cervical Spine Research Society (Hrsg.) The cervical spine, 2nd edn. Aufl. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 390–403

  44. Roy-Camille R, Mazel C, Saillant G, Benazet JP (1991) Rationale and techniques of internal fixation in trauma of the cervical spine. In: Errico T, Bauer RD, Waugh T (eds) Spinal trauma. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 163–191

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sakamoto T, Neo M, Nakamura T (2004) Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle. Spine 29(22):2510–2514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shin EK, Panjabi MM, Chen NC, Wang JL (2000) The anatomic variability of human cervical pedicles: considerations for transpedicular screw fixation in the middle and lower cervical spine. Eur Spine J 9(1):61–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Stanescu S, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting R, Bailey AS, Jackson WT (1994) Morphometric evaluation of the cervico-thoracic junction. Practical considerations for posterior fixation of the spine. Spine 19(18):2082–2088

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sutterlin CE III, McAfee PC, Warden KE, Rey RM Jr, Farey ID (1988) A biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a bovine model. Static and cyclical loading. Spine 13(7):795–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ugur HC, Attar A, Uz A, Tekdemir I et al (2000) Surgical anatomic evaluation of the cervical pedicle and adjacent neural structures. Neurosurgery 47(5):1162–1168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Weinstein JN, Rydevik BL, Rauschning W (1992) Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop 284:34–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu R, Nadaud MC, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA (1995) Morphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the C2 pedicle axis. Spine 20(3):259–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Xu R, Kang A, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA (1999) Anatomic relation between the cervical pedicle and the adjacent neural structures. Spine 24(5):451–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Specimens for this study were provided by Prof. H. Maurer, Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria. Implants were provided by Icotec AG, Altstaetten, Switzerland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

    M. Reinhold & M. Blauth

  2. Department of Radiology I, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria

    M. Rieger

  3. St. Gallen, Switzerland

    F. Magerl

Authors
  1. M. Reinhold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Magerl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Rieger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Blauth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Reinhold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinhold, M., Magerl, F., Rieger, M. et al. Cervical pedicle screw placement: feasibility and accuracy of two new insertion techniques based on morphometric data. Eur Spine J 16, 47–56 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0104-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0104-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation