Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Harvesting local cylinder autograft from adjacent vertebral body for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique, operative feasibility and preliminary clinical results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autogenous iliac crest has long served as the gold standard for anterior lumbar arthrodesis although added morbidity results from the bone graft harvest. Therefore, femoral ring allograft, or cages, have been used to decrease the morbidity of iliac crest bone harvesting. More recently, an experimental study in the animal showed that harvesting local bone from the anterior vertebral body and replacing the void by a radio-opaque β-tricalcium phosphate plug was a valid concept. However, such a concept precludes theoretically the use of posterior pedicle screw fixation. At one institution a consecutive series of 21 patients underwent single- or multiple-level circumferential lumbar fusion with anterior cages and posterior pedicle screws. All cages were filled with cancellous bone harvested from the adjacent vertebral body, and the vertebral body defect was filled with a β-tricalcium phosphate plug. The indications for surgery were failed conservative treatment of a lumbar degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to report on the surgical technique, operative feasibility, safety, benefits, and drawbacks of this technique with our primary clinical experience. An independent researcher reviewed all data that had been collected prospectively from the onset of the study. The average age of the patients was 39.9 (26–57) years. Bone grafts were successfully harvested from 28 vertebral bodies in all but one patient whose anterior procedure was aborted due to difficulty in freeing the left common iliac vein. This case was converted to a transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF). There was no major vascular injury. Blood loss of the anterior procedure averaged 250 ml (50–350 ml). One tricalcium phosphate bone plug was broken during its insertion, and one endplate was broken because of wrong surgical technique, which did not affect the final outcome. One patient had a right lumbar plexopathy that was not related to this special technique. There was no retrograde ejaculation, infection or pseudoarthrosis. One patient experienced a deep venous thrombosis. At the last follow up (mean 28 months) all patients had a solid lumbar spine fusion. At the 6-month follow up, the pain as assessed on the visual analog scale (VAS) decreased from 6.9 to 4.5 (33% decrease), and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) reduced from 48.0 to 31.7 with a 34% reduction. However, at 2 years follow up there was a trend for increase in the ODI (35) and VAS (5). The data in this study suggest that harvesting a cylinder of autograft from the adjacent vertebral body is safe and efficient. Filling of the void defect with a β-tricalcium phosphate plug does not preclude the use of posterior pedicle screw stabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aebi M, Steffen T (2000) Synframe: a preliminary report. Eur Spine J 9(Suppl 1):S44–S50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, Shepherd L, Holtom P (2002) Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(5):716–720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS (1995) Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 20(9):1055–1060

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkus JK, Sandhu HS, Gornet MF, Longley MC (2005) Use of rhBMP-2 in combination with structural cortical allografts: clinical and radiographic outcomes in anterior lumbar spinal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(6):1205–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2001) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 27:1131–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaasbeek RD, Toonen HG, van Heerwaarden RJ, Buma P (2005) Mechanism of bone incorporation of beta-TCP bone substitute in open wedge tibial osteotomy in patients. Biomaterials 26(33):6713–6719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goulet JA, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL, Greenfield ML (1997) Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop 339:76–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harwood PJ, Giannoudis PV (2005) Application of bone morphogenetic proteins in orthopaedic practice: their efficacy and side effects. Expert Opin Drug Saf 4(1):75–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Janssen ME, Lam C (2001) Outcomes of allogenic cages in anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 10(Suppl 2):S158–S168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kozak JA, O’Brien JP (1990) Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. An independent analysis of a treatment for the disabled low-back pain patient. Spine 15(4):322–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar N, Wild A, Webb JK, Aebi M (2000) Hybrid computer-guided and minimally open surgery: anterior lumbar interbody fusion and translaminar screw fixation. Eur Spine J 9(Suppl 1):S71–S77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lord CF, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ (1988) Infection in bone allografts. Incidence, nature, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(3):369–376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pavlov PW, Meijers H, van Limbeek J, Jacobs WC, Lemmens JA, Obradov-Rajic M, de Kleuver M (2004) Good outcome and restoration of lordosis after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with additional posterior fixation. Spine 29(17):1893–1899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG, Hall JM, Polly DW Jr, Kuklo TR (2005) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. Spinal Disord Tech 18(4):337–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pradhan BB, Delamarter R, Patel V, Bae H, Dawson E. Can rhBMP-2 (InFuse) Enhance fusion rates in anterior lumbar interbody fusion using stand-alone femoral ring allografts? Presented at the Scoliosis Research Society Buenos Aeres 2004

  16. Sasso RC, LeHuec JC, Shaffrey C, Spine Interbody Research Group (2005) Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective patient satisfaction outcome assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S77–S81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steffen T, Downer P, Steiner B, Hehli M, Aebi M (2000) Minimally invasive bone harvesting tools. Eur Spine J 9(Suppl 1):S114–S118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steffen T, Stoll T, Arvinte T, Schenk RK (2001) Porous tricalcium phosphate and transforming growth factor used for anterior spine surgery. Eur Spine J 10(Suppl 2):S132–S140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sutherland AG, Raafat A, Yates P, Hutchison JD (1997) Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank. J Hosp Infect 35(3):215–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tay BB, Berven S (2002) Indications, techniques, and complications of lumbar interbody fusion. Semin Neurol 22(2):221–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Arlet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arlet, V., Jiang, L., Steffen, T. et al. Harvesting local cylinder autograft from adjacent vertebral body for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique, operative feasibility and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 15, 1352–1359 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0100-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0100-5

Keywords

Navigation