Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systematic review with meta-analysis: loss of response and requirement of anti-TNFα dose intensification in Crohn’s disease

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To review the frequency with which anti-TNF-α loses its effect and dose “intensification” is required for Crohn’s disease (CD) treatment.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies. Raw data from studies meeting inclusion criteria were pooled for effect estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed for exploration of heterogeneity regarding all outcomes.

Results

Eighty-six eligible studies were included. Estimates of loss of response (LOR) incidence ranged from 8 to 71%. The random effects pooled incidence of LOR with a median follow-up of 1-year was 33% (95% CI 29–38, 55 studies, n = 6135). The effect estimate based on data from patients with infliximab was 33% (95% CI 27-40), 30% (95% CI 22–39) for adalimumab, and 41% (95% CI 30–53) for certolizumabpegol. Overall, the mean percentage of patients’ LOR to anti-TNFs was 38.5%. The annual risk for LOR was 20.9% per patient-year. The random-effects pooled rate of need for dose intensification with a median follow-up of 1 year was 34% (95% CI 28–41, 38 studies, n = 10,690). The effect estimate for infliximab was 38% (95% CI 28–50), 36% (95% CI 30–43) for adalimumab, and 2% (95% CI 2–3) for certolizumab-pegol. The mean percentage of patients who needed an anti-TNF dose escalation was 23% with an annual risk of 18.5% per patient-year. There was no evidence of publication bias for incidence of LOR but not for the dose intensification (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Overall, around one-third of CD patients experience a LOR and required dose intensification in primary anti-TNF-α responders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Maintenance infliximab for Crohn’s disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1541–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, et al. Adalimumab for maintenance of clinical response and remission in patients with Crohn’s disease: the CHARM trial. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:52–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schreiber S, Khaliq-Kareemi M, Lawrance IC, et al. Maintenance therapy with certolizumab pegol for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:239–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S, et al. Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1398–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lichtenstein GR, Yan S, Bala M, et al. Infliximab maintenance treatment reduces hospitalizations, surgeries, and procedures in fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:862–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Allez M, Karmiris K, Louis E, et al. Report of the ECCO pathogenesis workshop on anti-TNF therapy failures in inflammatory bowel diseases: definitions, frequency and pharmacological aspects. J Crohns Colitis. 2010;4:355–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Marano C, et al. Subcutaneous golimumab maintains clinical response in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(96–109):e1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman MF, Tukey JW. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Stat. 1950:607–611.

  12. Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1927;22(158):209–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ Br Med J. 2003;327:557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fleiss JL. The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 1993;2:121–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson SG, Higgins JP. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med. 2002;21:1559–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwarzer G. Meta: An R package for meta-analysis. SpherWave: an R package for analyzing scattered spherical data by Spherical Wavelets 2007:40.

  19. Rutgeerts P, D’Haens G, Targan S, et al. Efficacy and safety of retreatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody (infliximab) to maintain remission in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:761–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hommes DW, van de Heisteeg BH, van der Spek M, et al. Infliximab treatment for Crohn’s disease: one-year experience in a Dutch academic hospital. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002;8:81–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farrell RJ, Alsahli M, Jeen YT, et al. Intravenous hydrocortisone premedication reduces antibodies to infliximab in Crohn’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:917–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, et al. Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:876–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Candon S, Mosca A, Ruemmele F, et al. Clinical and biological consequences of immunization to infliximab in pediatric Crohn’s disease. Clin Immunol. 2006;118:11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Corman S, Issa M, Beaulieu DB, et al. Escalation of infliximab maintenance therapy in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:S470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hyams J, Crandall W, Kugathasan S, et al. Induction and maintenance infliximab therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease in children. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:863–73 (quiz 1165–1166).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ainsworth MA, Bendtzen K, Brynskov J. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha binding capacity and anti-infliximab antibodies measured by fluid-phase radioimmunoassays as predictors of clinical efficacy of infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:944–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Ridder L, Rings EH, Damen GM, et al. Infliximab dependency in pediatric Crohn’s disease: long-term follow-up of an unselected cohort. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:353–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gonzaga JE, Issa M, Skaros S, et al. W1255 Durability of infliximab in Crohn’s disease patients treated with maintenance infusions beyond one year. Gastroenterology. 2008;A-134:A-665–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gonzalez-Lama Y, Lopez-San Roman A, Marin-Jimenez I, et al. Open-label infliximab therapy in Crohn’s disease: a long-term multicenter study of efficacy, safety and predictors of response. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;31:421–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Milestone AN, Bullas DC, Hart AL, et al. M1146 Long-term outcome and adverse events in Crohn’s disease patients treated with infliximab at a single tertiary referral center over 9 years. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:A-348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rudolph SJ, Weinberg DI, McCabe RP. Long-term durability of Crohn’s disease treatment with infliximab. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1033–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Teshima CW, Thompson AF, Dhanoa LS, et al. W1243 Concomitant use of immunosuppressive therapy in an outpatient IBD subspecialty clinic results in rates of response higher than those seen in the infliximab randomized controlled trials. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:A-663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vera Mendoza I, Calvo M, De la Revilla J, et al. P098 Long-term infliximab in Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis Suppl. 2008;2:34–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, et al. Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1383–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Goldner DL, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Gee MS, et al. Clinical and radiological response to anti-TNF alpha treatment for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease in one institution in pediatric patients. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:S-508–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Steenholdt C, Bendtzen K, Brynskov J, et al. Cut-off levels and diagnostic accuracy of infliximab trough levels and anti-infliximab antibodies in Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:310–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Imaeda H, Andoh A, Fujiyama Y. Development of a new immunoassay for the accurate determination of anti-infliximab antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:136–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Ballet V, et al. Switch to adalimumab in patients with Crohn’s disease controlled by maintenance infliximab: prospective randomised SWITCH trial. Gut. 2012;61:229–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Brandse JF, Peters CP, Gecse KB, et al. Effects of infliximab retreatment after consecutive discontinuation of infliximab and adalimumab in refractory Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cornillie F, Hanauer SB, Diamond RH, et al. Postinduction serum infliximab trough level and decrease of C-reactive protein level are associated with durable sustained response to infliximab: a retrospective analysis of the ACCENT I trial. Gut. 2014;63:1721–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hibi T, Sakuraba A, Watanabe M, et al. C-reactive protein is an indicator of serum infliximab level in predicting loss of response in patients with Crohn’s disease. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:254–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Laclotte C, Bigard MA. Adalimumab maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease with intolerance or lost response to infliximab: an open-label study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:675–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sandborn WJ, Hanauer SB, Rutgeerts P, et al. Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of Crohn’s disease: results of the CLASSIC II trial. Gut. 2007;56:1232–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Seiderer J, Brand S, Dambacher J, et al. Adalimumab in patients with Crohn’s disease—safety and efficacy in an open-label single centre study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:787–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Karmiris K, Paintaud G, Degenne D, et al. P021 Adalimumab trough serum levels and clinical response in a single-center cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients: can trough serum levels serve as a predictor for future loss of response? J Crohns Colitis Suppl. 2008;2:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lopez Palacios N, Mendoza JL, Taxonera C. Adalimumab induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. An open-label study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2008;100:676–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Panaccione R, Sandborn WJ, D’Haens G, et al. 920 Adalimumab maintains long-term remission in moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease after infliximab failure: 1-year follow-up of gain trial. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:A-133–4.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bortlik M, Duricova D, Komarek V, et al. W1225 Adalimumab in a clinical practice—experience with human anti TNF-α therapy in tertiary clinical center. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:A-682.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Karmiris K, Paintaud G, Noman M, et al. Influence of trough serum levels and immunogenicity on long-term outcome of adalimumab therapy in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1628–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Oussalah A, Babouri A, Chevaux JB, et al. Adalimumab for Crohn’s disease with intolerance or lost response to infliximab: a 3-year single-centre experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:416–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chaparro M, Panes J, García V, et al. W1275 Long-Term Durability of Response to Adalimumab Treatment in Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:S-689.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Russo E, O’Donnell S, Dearden J, et al. W1312 Long-term efficacy of the second biologic in the management of Crohn’s disease. A retrospective survey on an English-Irish cohort. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:S-697.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Russo EA, Iacucci M, Lindsay JO, et al. Survey on the use of adalimumab as maintenance therapy in Crohn’s disease in England and Ireland. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22:334–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Swoger JM, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, et al. Adalimumab for Crohn’s disease in clinical practice at Mayo clinic: the first 118 patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:1912–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sprakes MB, Hamlin PJ, Warren L, et al. Adalimumab as second line anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy for Crohn’s disease: a single centre experience. J Crohns Colitis. 2011;5:324–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Molnar T, Farkas K, Nyari T, et al. Frequency and predictors of loss of response to infliximab or adalimumab in Crohn’s disease after one-year treatment period—a single center experience. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2012;21:265–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Assa A, Hartman C, Weiss B, et al. Long-term outcome of tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonist’s treatment in pediatric Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:369–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cozijnsen M, Duif V, Kokke F, et al. Adalimumab therapy in children with Crohn disease previously treated with infliximab. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60:205–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Stoinov S, et al. Certolizumab pegol for the treatment of Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:228–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. D’Haens G, Mitchev K, Sandborn WJ. T1126 Response and remission at 18 months of certolizumab pegol in patients with active Crohn’s disease is not influenced by rapidity and magnitude of induction: an analysis of PRECISE 2 and 3. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:489.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S, D’Haens GR, et al. 143 Welcome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing certolizumab pegol 400 Mg every 2 weeks with every 4 weeks for maintenance of response and remission in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease with secondary failure to infliximab. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:A-27.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lichtenstein G, Thomsen OO, Schreiber S, et al. S1040 Long-term remission with certolizumab pegol in Crohn’s Disease: efficacy over 4 years in patients with no prior TNF-α inhibitor exposure (PRECiSE 3 Study). Gastroenterology. 2010;138:S-165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Sandborn WJ, Abreu MT, D’Haens G, et al. Certolizumab pegol in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease and secondary failure to infliximab. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(688–695):e2.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sandborn WJ, Schreiber S, Hanauer SB, et al. Reinduction with certolizumab pegol in patients with relapsed Crohn’s disease: results from the PRECiSE 4 study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(696–702):e1.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mocciaro F, Renna S, Orlando A, et al. P.1.125: certolizumab pegol in patients with Crohn’s disease: a long term update of compassionate use. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43(Supplement 3):S189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sandborn WJ, Lee SD, Randall C, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol in the treatment of Crohn’s disease: 7-year results from the PRECiSE 3 study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40:903–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Regueiro M, Siemanowski B, Kip KE, et al. Infliximab dose intensification in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1093–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Schnitzler F, Fidder H, Ferrante M, et al. Long-term outcome of treatment with infliximab in 614 patients with Crohn’s disease: results from a single-centre cohort. Gut. 2009;58:492–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lam MC, Lee T, Atkinson K, et al. Time of infliximab therapy initiation and dose escalation in Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:214–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Taxonera C, Olivares D, Mendoza JL, et al. Need for infliximab dose intensification in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9170–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Sandborn WJ, Hanauer S, Loftus EV Jr, et al. An open-label study of the human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody adalimumab in subjects with prior loss of response or intolerance to infliximab for Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1984–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Papadakis KA, Shaye OA, Vasiliauskas EA, et al. Safety and efficacy of adalimumab (D2E7) in Crohn’s disease patients with an attenuated response to infliximab. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:75–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ho GT, Smith L, Aitken S, et al. The use of adalimumab in the management of refractory Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:308–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sheridan JA KD, Slattery E. Adalimumab in Crohn’s disease. Gut 2008;Suppl 2:A2564.

  75. West RL, Zelinkova Z, Wolbink GJ, et al. Immunogenicity negatively influences the outcome of adalimumab treatment in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28(9):1122–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Cohen RD, Lewis JR, Turner H, et al. W1093 Predictors and timing of adalimumab (ADA) dose escalation in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Gastroenterology. 2009;136:A-652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ho GT, Mowat A, Potts L, et al. Efficacy and complications of adalimumab treatment for medically-refractory Crohn’s disease: analysis of nationwide experience in Scotland (2004–2008). Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:527–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Kemp K, Dibb M, Makin A, et al. 2 year follow-up of adalimumab therapy in patients with Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2009;3:S27–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Lees C, Ali A, Thompson A, et al. The safety profile of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease in clinical practice: analysis of 620 patient-years follow-up. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:286–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Loftus Jr E, Pan X, Zurawski P. Dosage pattern of adalimumab in real-world clinical practice and predictors of dosage increase in patients with Crohn’s disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 2009;5.

  81. Swaminath A, Ullman T, Rosen M, et al. Early clinical experience with adalimumab in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with infliximab-treated and naïve patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29(3):273–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Bultman E, West RL, van Liere-Baron A, et al. W1335 Previous non-response to infliximab predicts early dose-escalation in adalimumab treated Crohn’s disease patients. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:S-701–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Nichita C, Stelle M, Vavricka S, et al. Clinical experience with adalimumab in a multicenter Swiss cohort of patients with Crohn’s disease. Digestion. 2010;81:78–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Panaccione R, Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, et al. Adalimumab sustains clinical remission and overall clinical benefit after 2 years of therapy for Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:1296–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Wolf DC, Wolf CH. W1325 Persistency equals efficacy in adalimumab patients: preliminary report of a large single site experience. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:S-699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Cordero Ruiz P, Castro Marquez C, Mendez Rufian V, et al. Efficacy of adalimumab in patients with Crohn’s disease and failure to infliximab therapy: a clinical series. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103:294–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Fortea-Ormaechea JI, González-Lama Y, Casis B, et al. Adalimumab is effective in long-term real life clinical practice in both luminal and perianal Crohn’s disease. The Madrid experience. Gastroenterología y Hepatología. 2011;34:443–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Issa M, Zadvornova Y, Naik AS, et al. High rates of escalation and termination of adalimumab therapy and patients exposed to infliximab. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:588.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Kiss LS, Szamosi T, Molnar T, et al. Early clinical remission and normalisation of CRP are the strongest predictors of efficacy, mucosal healing and dose escalation during the first year of adalimumab therapy in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:911–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Sandborn WJ, Colombel JF, Lomax KG, et al. Achievement of early deep remission is associated with lower rates of weekly dosing for adalimumab-treated patients with Crohn’s disease: data from EXTEND. Gut. 2011;60:A136–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Bultman E, de Haar C, van Liere-Baron A, et al. Predictors of dose escalation of adalimumab in a prospective cohort of Crohn’s disease patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:335–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Cohen RD, Lewis JR, Turner H, et al. Predictors of adalimumab dose escalation in patients with Crohn’s disease at a tertiary referral center. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Baert F, Glorieus E, Reenaers C, et al. Adalimumab dose escalation and dose de-escalation success rate and predictors in a large national cohort of Crohn’s patients. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:154–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Hyams J, Walters TD, Crandall W, et al. Safety and efficacy of maintenance infliximab therapy for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease in children: rEACH open-label extension. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27:651–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Ben-Bassat O, Iacono A, Irwin SP, et al. Tu1327a Golimumab for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Anti-TNF Refaractory Crohn’s Disease: Open Label Experience. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:S-804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Ma C, Huang V, Fedorak DK, et al. Crohn’s disease outpatients treated with adalimumab have an earlier secondary loss of response and requirement for dose escalation compared to infliximab: a real life cohort study. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:1454–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Allez M, Vermeire S, Mozziconacci N, et al. The efficacy and safety of a third anti-TNF monoclonal antibody in Crohn’s disease after failure of two other anti-TNF antibodies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:92–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Rubin DT, Sederman R. T1324 Administrative claims data analysis of certolizumab pegol in Crohn’s disease PTS demonstrates low rates of dose escalation and high compliance and persistency. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:S-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Naik AS, Qumseya B, Ananthakrishnan AN, et al. W1102 Anti-TNF therapy for Crohn’s disease: predictors of dose escalation and early discontinuation by 1 year of therapy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:654.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Rubin DT, Sederman R. 959 Maintenance of response to biologic therapy in Crohn’s disease is improved with “early use” v. “step up” treatment using health claims data. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:A-146.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Plevy S, Lu M, Yu A, et al. Observational study of treatment patterns in patients newly initiated with adalimumab or infliximab therapy for Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:S479.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P. The potential for disease modification in Crohn’s disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:79–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Gisbert JP, Panes J. Loss of response and requirement of infliximab dose intensification in Crohn’s disease: a review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:760–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Billioud V, Sandborn WJ, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Loss of response and need for adalimumab dose intensification in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:674–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Chao J, Mulani P. What is the rate of loss of response to infliximab therapy in Crohn’s disease? Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2353–4 (author reply 2354–2355).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Kopylov U, Al-Taweel T, Yaghoobi M, et al. Adalimumab monotherapy versus combination therapy with immunomodulators in patients with Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:1632–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Moore C, Corbett G, Moss AC. Systematic review and meta-analysis: serum infliximab levels during maintenance therapy and outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2016.

  108. Strik AS, Bots SJ, D’Haens G, et al. Optimization of anti-TNF therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9:429–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Panaccione R, Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, et al. Adalimumab maintains remission of Crohn’s disease after up to 4 years of treatment: data from CHARM and ADHERE. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38(10):1236–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and wrote the manuscript: Yun Qiu, Bai-li Chen; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Ren Mao, Sheng-hong Zhang, Yao He, Zhi-rong Zeng, and Shomron Ben-Horin; study concept and design, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, statistical analysis, and study supervision: Min-hu Chen. All authors discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-hu Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Financial support

This study was financially supported in part by National Key Clinical Department in Ministry of Public Health, China (No. 303004269002) and Scientific Project of Guangzhou, China (No. 2011YZ-00004).

Additional information

Yun Qiu and Bai-li Chen contributed equally to this paper.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

535_2017_1324_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 1. Assessment of quality of randomized controlled trials using Cochrane risk of bias tool (TIFF 591 kb)

535_2017_1324_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Supplementary Table 1. Assessment of quality of observational studies using Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) (DOCX 19 kb)

535_2017_1324_MOESM3_ESM.docx

Supplementary Table 2. Summary of subgroup analysis of anti-TNFs dose intensification among primary responders (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, Y., Chen, Bl., Mao, R. et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: loss of response and requirement of anti-TNFα dose intensification in Crohn’s disease. J Gastroenterol 52, 535–554 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1324-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1324-3

Keywords

Navigation