Skip to main content
Log in

An artificial neural network approach for under-reamed piles subjected to uplift forces in dry sand

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is about under-reamed pile subjected to uplift forces. They are known to be very effective especially against uplift forces. The objective is to develop a simple design formula based on an optimized artificial neural network (ANN) predictive approach model. This formula can calculate the ultimate uplift capacity of under-reamed piles (Pul) embedded in dry cohesionless soil with excellent accuracy. The new generated ANN model was developed by taking into account the key factors such as under-reamed base diameter, angle of enlarged base to the vertical axis, shaft diameter, and embedment ratio. The proposed approach shows excellent agreement with a mean absolute error (MAE) less than 0.262, which is better than previous theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nazir R, Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M, Tourtiz A (2015) Appraisal of reliable skin friction variation in a bored pile. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering 168(1):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mosquera ZSZ, Tsuha CDC, Schiavon JA, Thorel L (2015) Discussion of “field investigation of the axial resistance of helical piles in dense sand”. Can Geotech J 52(8):1190–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Milad F, Kamal T, Nader H, Erman O (2015) New method for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of driven piles by using flap number. KSCE J Civ Eng 19(3):611–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arulmoli K, Martin GR, Gasparro MG, Shahrestani S, Buzzoni G (2004) Design of pile foundations for liquefaction-induced lateral spread displacements. Amer Soc Civil Engineers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Borel S, Xv I (2001) The design of piled-raft foundations under lateral load. A a Balkema Publishers, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tomlinson M, Woodward J (2008) Pile design and construction practice “5th edition”. Taylor and Francis Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris DE, Madabhushi GSP (2015) Uplift capacity of an under-reamed pile foundation. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering 168(6):526–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao N, Geng HX, Ma K, Li KN (2011) Elastic-plastic analysis on damaged multi-tower isolation structure with an enlarged base. In: Zhao JY (ed) Advances in civil engineering, pts 1–6. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Stafa-Zurich, pp 2550–2554

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sego DC, Biggar KW, Wong G (2003) Enlarged base (belled) piles for use in ice or ice-rich permafrost. J Cold Reg Eng 17(2):68–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grigoryan AA, Chinenkov YA (1990) Bearing capacity and settlements of bored piles with enlarged bases in collapsible soils. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bartholomew RF (1977) Enlarged base piles form an important class. Structural Engineer 55(12):A7–A7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nazir R, Moayedi H, Pratikso A, Mosallanezhad M (2015) The uplift load capacity of an enlarged base pier embedded in dry sand. Arab J Geosci 8(9):7285–7296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nazir R, Chuan HS, Niroumand H, Kassim KA (2014) Performance of single vertical helical anchor embedded in dry sand. Measurement 49:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakr M (2015) Relationship between installation torque and axial capacities of helical piles in cohesionless soils. J Perform Constr Facil 29(6):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsuha CDC, Aoki N (2010) Relationship between installation torque and uplift capacity of deep helical piles in sand. Can Geotech J 47(6):635–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Briançon L, Simon B (2011) Performance of pile-supported embankment over soft soil: full-scale experiment. J Geotech Geoenviron 138(4):551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Honda T, Hirai Y, Sato E (2011) Uplift capacity of belled and multi-belled piles in dense sand. Soils Found 51(3):483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chae D, Cho W, Na HY (2012) Uplift capacity of belled pile in weathered sandstones. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering 22(4):297–305

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yao WJ, Chen SP (2014) Elastic-plastic analytical solutions of deformation of uplift belled pile. Teh Vjesn 21(6):1201–1211

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin JG, Hsu SY, Lin SS (2015) The new method to evaluate the uplift capacity of belled piles in sandy soil. J Mar Sci Technol-Taiwan 23(4):523–533

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmadi H, Hajialilue-Bonab M (2012) Experimental and analytical investigations on bearing capacity of strip footing in reinforced sand backfills and flexible retaining wall. Acta Geotech 7(4):357–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Horpibulsuk S, Niramitkornburee A (2010) Pullout resistance of bearing reinforcement embedded in sand. Soils Found 50(2):215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. El Sawwaf M, Nazir A (2006) The effect of soil reinforcement on pullout resistance of an existing vertical anchor plate in sand. Comput Geotech 33(3):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tafreshi SNM, Javadi S, Dawson AR (2014) Influence of geocell reinforcement on uplift response of belled piles. Acta Geotech 9(3):513–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Suman S, Das SK, Mohanty R (2016) Prediction of friction capacity of driven piles in clay using artificial intelligence techniques. Int J Geotech Eng 10(5):469–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Momeni E, Nazir R, Armaghani DJ, Maizir H (2015) Application of artificial neural network for predicting shaft and tip resistances of concrete piles. Earth Sci Res J 19(1):85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shahin MA (2016) State-of-the-art review of some artificial intelligence applications in pile foundations. Geosci Front 7(1):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shahin MA (2014) Artificial intelligence for modeling load-settlement response of axially loaded bored piles. Crc Press-Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Kordjazi A, Nejad FP, Jaksa MB (2014) Prediction of ultimate axial load-carrying capacity of piles using a support vector machine based on CPT data. Comput Geotech 55:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Baziar MH, Kashkooli A, Saeedi-Azizkandi A (2012) Prediction of pile shaft resistance using cone penetration tests (CPTs). Comput Geotech 45:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alkroosh I, Nikraz H (2014) Predicting pile dynamic capacity via application of an evolutionary algorithm. Soils Found 54(2):233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang CH, Yang SQ, Zhang JG, Xie JH, Zhang JL (2010) The numerical simulation of low strain dynamic response for foundation piles and the application for defect diagnosis by artificial neural networks. Science Press Beijing, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tarawneh B, Imam R (2014) Regression versus artificial neural networks: predicting pile setup from empirical data. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(4):1018–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanna AM, Morcous G, Helmy M (2004) Efficiency of pile groups installed in cohesionless soil using artificial neural networks. Can Geotech J 41(6):1241–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nejad FP, Jaksa MB, Kakhi M, McCabe BA (2009) Prediction of pile settlement using artificial neural networks based on standard penetration test data. Comput Geotech 36(7):1125–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liang BL, Gao Y, Zhu L, Lv GB, Li X (2005) Prediction of pile displacement using PSO algorithm and artificial neural networks. China Univ Geosciences Press, Wuhan

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rahman M, Wang J, Deng W, Carter J (2001) A neural network model for the uplift capacity of suction caissons. Comput Geotech 28(4):269–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ardalan H, Eslami A, Nariman-Zadeh N (2009) Piles shaft capacity from CPT and CPTu data by polynomial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Comput Geotech 36(4):616–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alavi AH, Aminian P, Gandomi AH, Esmaeili MA (2011) Genetic-based modeling of uplift capacity of suction caissons. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):12608–12618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheng M-Y, Cao M-T, Tran D-H (2014) A hybrid fuzzy inference model based on RBFNN and artificial bee colony for predicting the uplift capacity of suction caissons. Autom Constr 41:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hagan M, Demuth H, Beale M (1996) Neural network design. PWS Pub, Boston ISBN 7-111-10841-8

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fierro R, Lewis F (1999) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. IEEE Trans Syst Man, Cybern 29(6):649–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Moayedi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moayedi, H., Rezaei, A. An artificial neural network approach for under-reamed piles subjected to uplift forces in dry sand. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 327–336 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2990-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2990-z

Keywords

Navigation