Skip to main content
Log in

Regression versus artificial neural networks: Predicting pile setup from empirical data

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Piles have been used as a deep foundation for both inland and offshore structures. After installation, pile capacity may increase with time. This time dependent capacity increase is known as setup, and was first mentioned in the literature in 1900 by Wendel. When accounted for accurately during the design stages, the integration of pile setup can lead to more cost-effective pile design as it will reduce pile length, pile section, and size of driving equipment. In this paper, Both Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) models were developed for predicting pile setup for three pile types (pipe, concrete, and H-pile) using 169 dynamic load tests obtained from the published literature and the authors’ files. In addition, the paper discusses the choice of variables that were examined to obtain the optimum model. Furthermore, the paper compares the predictions obtained by the developed MLR and the ANN models with those given by four traditional empirical formulae. It is concluded that the ANN model outperforms both the MLR model and the examined empirical formulae in predicting the measured pile setup. Finally, static load test data was used to further verify the developed models. It’s noted that the optimal ANN model overestimated pile capacity by 17% to 21% for the H-piles, and underestimated pile capacity by 12% to 17% for the pipe piles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antorena, J. M. and McDaniel, T. G. (1995). “Dynamic pile testing in soils exhibiting set-up.” Proceedings of the Deep Foundations Institute 20 th Annual Members Conference and Meeting, Charleston, South Carolina, pp. 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abe, S., Likins, G. E., and Morgano, C. M. (1990). “Three case studies on static and dynamic testing of piles.” Geotechnical News Magazine, Vol. 8, No. 4, Richmond, Canada, pp. 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Kiefa, M. A. (1998). “General regression neural networks for driven piles in cohesionless soils.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 12, pp. 1177–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson, G. (1998). “Long-term increase in shaft capacity of driven piles in sand.” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendana, R., Del Cano, A., and De la Cruz, M. P. (2008). “Contractor selection: Fuzzy-control approach.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, W. G. and Klingbeg, D. J. (2000). “Predicting uplift deflection from dynamic pile testing.” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Application of Stress-wave Theory to Piles, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W., Chow, Y. K., and Liu, L. F. (1995). “Neural network: An alternative to pile driving formulae.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikmen, I. and Birgonul, M. T. (2004). “Neural network model to support international market entry decisions.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp. 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dover, A. and Howard, R. (2002). “High capacity pipe piles at san francisco international airport.” Proceedings of the Deep Foundations Congress, Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausett, L. (1994). Fundamentals of neural networks: Architecture, algorithms, and applications. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellenius, B. H. (1999). “Using the pile driving analyzer.” Proceedings of the Pile Driving Contractors Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellenius, B. H. and Altaee, A. (2002). “Pile dynamics in geotechnical practice — six case histories.” Proceedings of the International Deep Foundation Congress, ASCE, Vol. 2, pp. 619–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellenius, B. H., Riker, R. E., O’Brien, A. J., and Tracy, G. R. (1989). “Dynamic and static testing in soil exhibiting set-up.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 7, pp. 984–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, I. and Kartam, N. (1994). “Neural networks in civil engineering: Principles and understanding.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, A. T. C. (1994). “Nonlinear modelling in geotechnical engineering using neural networks.” Australian Civil Engineering Transactions, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 293–297.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, A. T. C. (1995). “Empirical design in geotechnics using neural networks.” Geotechnique, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 709–714.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht-Nielson, R. (1990). Neurocomputing, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D. M. and Beddard, D. L. (1995). “Dynamic testing results, indicator pile test program, I-880, Oakland, California.” Proceedings of the Deep Foundations Institute 20th Annual Members Conference and Meeting, Charleston, South Carolina, pp. 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H. (1989). “Multilayer feed forward networks are universal approximators.” Neural Networks, Vol. 2, pp. 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein, M. H., Sharp, M. R., and Knight, W. F. (2002). “The use of superposition for evaluating pile capacity.” Proceedings of the Deep Foundations Congress, Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE, Vol. 1, No. 116, pp. 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongkoo, J. (2007). Fuzzy and neural network models for analyses of piles, PhD Thesis, North Carolina State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, L. I. and Decapite, K. (2011). Prediction of pile set-up for Ohio soils, Report No. 2011/3, U.S. Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komurka, V. E. (2004). “Incorporating set-up and support cost distributions into driven pile design.” Current Practices and Future Trends in Deep Foundations, Geotechnical Special Publications, ASCE/Geo-Institute, Vol. 125, pp.16–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. M. and Lee, J. H. (1996). “Prediction of pile bearing capacity using artificial neural networks.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. M., Kerrigan, J. A., and Wysockey, M. H. (1999). “Measured time effects for axial capacity of driven piling.” Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1663, Vol. 8, No. 15, pp. 1183–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, S. W. and Pitts, H. W. (1943). “A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Vol. 5, pp. 115–133.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nejad, F. P., Jaksa, M. B., Kakhi, M., and McCabe, B. A. (2009). “Prediction of pile settlement using artificial neural networks based on standard penetration test data.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 36, No. 7, pp. 1125–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. W. (2011). Pile setup, dynamic construction control, and load and resistance factor design of vertically-loaded steel H-Piles, PhD Thesis, Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelim, M. J., March, R., and Hussein, M. H. (1989). “Bearing capacity of piles in soils with time dependent characteristics.” Piling and Deep Foundations, Vol. 1, pp. 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Principe, J., Euliano, N., and Lefebvre, W. C. (1999). Neural and adaptive systems: Fundamentals through simulations, Wiley, New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahin, M. A., Maier, H. R., and Jaksa, M. B. (2002). “Predicting settlement of shallow foundations using artificial neural networks.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 9, pp. 785–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahin, M. A., Maier, H. R., and Jaksa, M. B. (2004). “Data division for developing neural networks applied to geotechnical engineering.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skov, R. and Denver, H. (1988). “Time-dependence of bearing capacity of piles.” Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Application of Stress-wave Theory to Piles, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 879–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez, R. (2008). “Parametric range estimating of building costs using regression models and bootstrap.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 12, pp. 1011–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez, R. and Rowings, J. E. (1998). “Construction labor productivity modeling with neural networks.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124, No. 6, pp. 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svinkin, M. R. (1995). “Soil damping in saturated sandy soils for determining capacity of piles by wave equation analysis.” Proceedings of the Deep Foundations Institute 20th Annual Members Conference and Meeting, pp. 200–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svinkin, M. R. (1996). “Setup and relaxation in glacial sand-discussion.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 4, pp. 319–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svinkin, M. R. and Skov, R. (2000). “Set-up effect of cohesive soils in pile capacity.” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Application of Stress-wave Theory to Piles, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svinkin, M. R., Morgano, C. M., and Morvant, M. (1994). “Pile capacity as a function of time in clayey and sandy soil.” Proceedings of the 5 th International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations, Bruges, Paper 1.11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R., Held, L., and Say, S. (2009). “Test pile program to determine axial capacity and pile setup for the biloxi bay bridge.” Deep Foundation Institute Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokar, S. A. and Johnson, P. A. (1999). “Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 232–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rana Imam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarawneh, B., Imam, R. Regression versus artificial neural networks: Predicting pile setup from empirical data. KSCE J Civ Eng 18, 1018–1027 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0072-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0072-7

Keywords

Navigation