Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of a novel, simple nutrition screening tool for adult oncology inpatients and the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) against the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Oncology inpatients are at high risk of malnutrition. Identification of at risk patients by nutrition screening requires a practical and easy to use tool. In this study, we have compared a simple, novel nutrition screening tool designed for an oncology inpatient setting and the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) against the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA).

Methods

This was an observational study to compare assessment of nutritional status by PG-SGA with nutrition screening using the Royal Marsden Nutrition Screening Tool (RMNST) and the MST. Patients were recruited from a single tertiary cancer centre.

Results

One hundred and twenty-six oncology inpatients underwent a full nutritional assessment and nutrition screening. The PG-SGA tool identified 90 (71 %) patients as malnourished or at risk and 36 (29 %) patients as well-nourished. The RMNST had a sensitivity of 93 % and a specificity of 53 %, and the MST had a sensitivity of 66 % and a specificity of 83 %. Predictive value (ROC AUC) of both screening tools was excellent at 0.84 and 0.83 for RMNST and MST, respectively.

Conclusions

This study identified a high prevalence of malnutrition in the population with 71 % of patients being identified as malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. The RMNST had an excellent sensitivity for identifying patients who were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition in the inpatient setting although it had a poor specificity. The MST had a poorer sensitivity of 66 %. We would recommend that the RMNST is trialled in other oncology inpatient settings and also in the outpatient setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Segura A et al (2005) An epidemiological evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition in Spanish paitents with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. Clin Nutr 24(5):801–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanchez-Lara K et al (2012) Gastrointestinal symptoms and weight loss in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Br J Nutr 109(5):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bozzetti F (2009) Screening the nutritional status in oncology: a preliminary report on 1,000 outpatients. Support Care Cancer 17:279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ravasco P et al (2005) Impact of nutrition on outcome: a prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Head Neck 27(8):659–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bovio G et al (2009) Upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with advanced cancer: relationship to nutritional and performance status. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 17(10):1317–1324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khalid U et al (2007) Symptoms and weight loss in patients with gastrointestinal and lung cancer at presentation. Support Care Cancer 15:39–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Andreyev H et al (1998) Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies? Eur J Cancer 34(4):503–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bozzetti F et al (2007) Postoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer patients: the joint role of the nutritional status and the nutritional support. Clin Nutr 26:698–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross PJ et al (2004) Do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancers? Br J Cancer 90(10):1905–1911

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ravasco P et al (2005) Dietary counseling improves patient outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in colorectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23(7):1431–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amaral TF et al (2008) An evaluation of three nutritional screening tools in a Portuguese oncology centre. J Hum Nutr Diet 21:575–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Correia MI, Waitzberg DL (2003) The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr 22(3):235–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brotherton A et al (2011) Malnutrition is dangerous: the importance of effective nutritional screening and nutritional care. Clinical Risk 17(4):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. NICE. Cost saving guidance. 2013; Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/usingguidance/benefitsofimplementation/costsavingguidance.jsp

  15. Isenring EA, Capra S, Bauer JD (2004) Nutrition intervention is beneficial in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the gastrointestinal or head and neck area. Br J Cancer 91(3):447–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ottery FD (1996) Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology. Nutrition 12(1):S15–S19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Detsky A et al (1987) What is subjective Global Assessment of Nutritional Status? J Parenter Enter Nutr 11(1):8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer J, Capra S (2003) Comparison of a malnutrition screening tool with subjective global assessment in hospitalised patients with cancer - sensitivity and specificity. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 12(3):257–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Read JA et al (2005) Nutritional assessment in cancer: comparing the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) with the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PGSGA). Nutr Cancer 53(1):51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Young AM et al (2013) Malnutrition screening tools: comparison against two validated nutrition assessment methods in older medical inpatients. Nutrition 29(1):101–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Green SM, Watson R (2005) Nutritional screening and assessment tools for use by nurses: literature review. J Adv Nurs 50(1):69–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leuenberger M, Kurmann S, Stanga Z (2010) Nutritional screening tools in daily clinical practice: the focus on cancer. Support Care Cancer 18(Suppl 2):S17–S27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care. Nutrition support in adults Oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition. February 2006. London

  24. Kondrup J et al (2003) ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 22(4):415–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huhmann MB, August DA (2008) Review of American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) clinical guidelines for nutrition support in cancer patients: nutrition screening and assessment. Nutr Clin Pract 23(2):182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferguson M et al (1999) Validation of a malnutrition screening tool for patients receiving radiotherapy. Australas Radiol 43(3):325–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Isenring E et al (2006) Validity of the malnutrition screening tool as an effective predictor of nutritional risk in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 14(11):1152–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Raja R et al (2008) Nurses’ views and practices regarding use of validated nutrition screening tools. Aust J Adv Nurs 26(1):26–33

    Google Scholar 

  29. Porter J et al (2009) Exploring issues influencing the use of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool by nurses in two Australian hospitals. J Hum Nutr Diet 22(3):203–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen X, Ang E, Bte Nasir N (2012) Nutritional screening among patients with cancer in an acute care hospital: a best practice implementation project. Int J Evid Based Healthc 10(4):377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ottery, F., Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. In: The clinical guide to oncology nutrition, ed. McCallum PD. and C. Polisena. 2000, Chicago: The American Dietetic Association. 11-23.

  32. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey

  33. BAPEN. Nutrition screening survey in the UK in 2008. Hospitals, care homes and mental health units. A report by the BAPEN. 2009; Available from: http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/nsw/nsw_report2008-09.pdf

  34. Isenring EA et al (2012) Beyond malnutrition screening: appropriate methods to guide nutrition care for aged care residents. J Acad Nutr Diet 112(3):376–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gabrielson DK et al (2013) Use of an abridged scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (abPG-SGA) as a nutritional screening tool for cancer patients in an outpatient setting. Nutr Cancer 65(2):234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M (2002) Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 56(8):779–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim JY et al (2011) Development and validation of a nutrition screening tool for hospitalized cancer patients. Clin Nutr 30(6):724–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bapen. Nutrition screening survey in the UK and Republic of Ireland in 2011 A Report by the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN). 2011; Available from: http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/nsw/nsw-2011-report.pdf

  39. Kyle UG et al (2006) Comparison of tools for nutritional assessment and screening at hospital admission: a population study. Clin Nutr 25(3):409–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Boleo-Tome C et al (2012) Validation of Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) in cancer. Br J Nutr 108(2):343–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sarhill N et al (2003) Evaluation of nutritional status in advanced metastatic cancer. Support Care Cancer 11:652–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jeejeebhoy KN (2000) Nutritional assessment. Nutrition 16(7–8):585–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Geurden B et al (2012) Self-reported body weight and height on admission to hospital: a reliable method in multi-professional evidence-based nutritional care? Int J Nurs Pract 18(5):509–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Steenson J, Vivanti A, Isenring E (2013) Inter-rater reliability of the Subjective Global Assessment: a systematic literature review. Nutrition 29(1):350–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Barbosa-Silva MC, Barros AJ (2006) Indications and limitations of the use of subjective global assessment in clinical practice: an update. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 9(3):263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. van Bokhorst-De Van Der Schueren MAE et al (2013) Nutrition screening tools: Does one size fit all? A systematic review of screening tools for the hospital setting. Clin Nutr 33(1):39–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No funding is declared although we acknowledge support from the NIHR RM/ICR Biomedical Research Centre.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, Sutton, UK

    Clare Shaw, Catherine Fleuret, Jennifer M. Pickard, Gayle Black & Linda Wedlake

  2. Research and Development, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, Sutton, UK

    Kabir Mohammed

Authors
  1. Clare Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine Fleuret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer M. Pickard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kabir Mohammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gayle Black
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Linda Wedlake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare Shaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaw, C., Fleuret, C., Pickard, J.M. et al. Comparison of a novel, simple nutrition screening tool for adult oncology inpatients and the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) against the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). Support Care Cancer 23, 47–54 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2319-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2319-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation