Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental impact assessment of a new nuclear power plant (NPP) based on atmospheric dispersion modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency’s short-range atmospheric dispersion model (AERMOD 12345) is a good candidate for radiological dose calculations to the general public and the environment. It advanced capability should provide better confidence in the accuracy of offsite dose and risk assessment. The code has been used to compute the scaling factors for air concentration and ground level deposition of fission products based on routine and hypothetical accident releases from the NPP site in Geregu, Nigeria (7°33′N, 6°41′E). All computations were within the 16 km emergency planing zone of a generic reactor design considered by the study. The scaling factors have been used to assess the potential environmental risk of the NPP using an integrated approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionizing radiation (D-ERICA). Obtained results should provide baseline information for decision making in terms of operation license provision for the pioneer NPP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abila N (2010) Biofuels adoption in Nigeria: a preliminary review of feedstock and fuel production potentials. Manag Environ Qual Int J 21(6):785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aduba O (2012) Nigeria to attain 4000 MW from nuclear power plants by 2030. Guardian Newspaper 18 July, 2012

  • Agu MN (2012) Preparation for environmental impact assessment for the first nuclear power plant. IAEA Technical meeting on environmental issues in new Nuclear Power Programs 20–23 March, Vienna, Austria

  • Akorede M, Hizam H, Ab Kadir M, Aris I, Buba S (2012) Mitigating the anthropogenic global warming in the electric power industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):2747–2761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyu AS, Ramli AT, Saleh MA (2013a) Nigeria electricity crisis: power generation capacity expansion and environmental ramifications. Energy 61:345–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyu AS, Ramli AT, Saleh MA (2013b) First nuclear power in Nigeria: an attempt to address the energy crisis? Int J Nucl Gov Econ Ecol 4(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford N, Brown J, Copplestone D, Garnier-Laplace J, Howard B, Larsson C, Oughton D, Pröhl G, Zinger I (2007) D-ERICA: an integrated approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising radiation. Description of purpose, methodology and application. EC contract number FI6R-CT-2004-508847. European Commission, Brussels

  • Caputo M, Giménez M, Schlamp M (2003) Intercomparison of atmospheric dispersion models. Atmos Environ 37(18):2435–2449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chino M, Nakayama H, Nagai H, Terada H, Katata G, Yamazawa H (2011) Preliminary estimation of release amounts of 131I and 137Cs accidentally discharged from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant into the atmosphere. J Nucl Sci Technol 48(7):1129–1134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cimorelli A, Perry S, Venkatram A, Weil J, Paine R, Wilson R, Lee R, Peters W, Brode R, Paumier J (2004) AERMOD: description of model formulation. US Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina

  • Desnoyers Y, Chilès J-P, Dubot D, Jeannée N, Idasiak J-M (2011) Geostatistics for radiological evaluation: study of structuring of extreme values. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(8):1031–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elogne SN, Hristopulos DT, Varouchakis E (2008) An application of Spartan spatial random fields in environmental mapping: focus on automatic mapping capabilities. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22(5):633–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, Ermolieva T, Ermoliev Y, Sun L (2009) Risk-adjusted approaches for planning sustainable agricultural development. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(4):441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JT (ed) (2011) Radiological releases and environmental monitoring at commercial nuclear power plants. In Tech

  • Hoeve JET, Jacobson MZ (2012) Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. Energy Environ Sci 5(9):8743–8757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homann SG (2011) HotSpot. Health Physics Codes for the PC Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory UCRL-MA-106315

  • IAEA (2002) Dispersion of radioactive material in air and water and consideration of population distribution in site evaluation for nuclear power plants. Safety Series No. NS-G-3.2. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  • IAEA (2011) Meteorological and hydrological hazards in site evaluation for nuclear Installations. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-18

  • ICRP (1982) Atmospheric dispersion models for potential accident consequence assessments at nuclear power plants: regulatory guide (RG) 1.145. Revision lUS NRC, Washington, DC

  • ICRP (2007) ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37(2.4):2

  • ICRP (1990) ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICPR 21(1–3)

  • Iwayemi A (2008) Nigeria’s dual energy problems: policy issues and challenges. Int Assoc Energy Econ 17–21

  • Jibiri N (2001) Assessment of health risk levels associated with terrestrial gamma radiation dose rates in Nigeria. Environ Int 27(1):21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jilani AB (2009) Atmospheric dispersion and consequence modeling of radiological emergencies. Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences

  • Kamada N, Saito O, Endo S, Kimura A, Shizuma K (2012) Radiation doses among residents living 37 km northwest of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. J Environ Radioact 110:84–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katata G, Terada H, Nagai H, Chino M (2012) Numerical reconstruction of high dose rate zones due to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. J Environ Radioact 111:2–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy-Darling J, Hoyt N, Murao K, Ross A (2008) The energy crisis of Nigeria: an overview and implications for the future. The University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandakar HA, Moritomi H (2013) Assessment of ambient mercury deposition fluxes by numerical air quality modeling. Air Qual Atmos Health 6(3):629–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristoferson L (1979) Energy and environment in East Africa: report from a workshop. Ambio 8:220–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson C-M (2008) An overview of the ERICA integrated approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants. J Environ Radioact 99(9):1364–1370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon C, Kelleher K, McGinnity P, Organo C, Smith K, Currivan L, Ryan T (2013) Proposed nuclear power plants in the UK—potential radiological implications for Ireland. Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland

  • Mutshinda CM, Antai I, O’Hara RB (2008) A probabilistic approach to exposure risk assessment. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22(4):441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabeshima K, Türkcan E, Ciftcioglu Ö (1993) Real-time nuclear power plant monitoring with adaptively trained neural network. Springer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabeshima K, Suzudo T, Suzuki K, Türkcan E (1998) Real-time nuclear power plant monitoring with neural network. J Nucl Sci Technol 35(2):93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Napier BA (2006) GENII version 2 users’ guide. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory report PNNL-14583, Rev, vol 3

  • Napier BA, Strenge DL, Ramsdell JV, Eslinger PW, Fosmire C (2004) GENII Version 2: Software Design Document. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

  • Nelson N, Kitchen K, Maryon R (2002) Assessment of routine atmospheric discharges from the Sellafield nuclear installation—Cumbria UK. Atmos Environ 36(19):3203–3215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall WJ (2004) Nuclear renaissance: technologies and policies for the future of nuclear power. Taylor and Francis, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Obadote D (2009) Energy crisis in Nigeria: technical issues and solutions. In: Power sector prayer conference June, 2009

  • Ojo E (2009) Manufacturers need 2,000 MW of electricity to stay afloat-man. BusinessDay Nigeria, Tuesday, 21 July 2009

  • Okafor E, Joe-Uzuegbu C (2010) Challenges to development of renewable energy for electric power sector in Nigeria. Int J Acad Res 2(2):211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry SG, Cimorelli AJ, Paine RJ, Brode RW, Weil JC, Venkatram A, Wilson RB, Lee RF, Peters WD (2005) AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part II: model performance against 17 field study databases. J Appl Meteorol 44(5):694–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambo A (2007) Alternative generation and renewable energy. Paper presented at the 2nd Power Business Leaders Summit, Ibom Gulf Resort, Akwa Ibom State 12th–14th December

  • Sambo AS, Garba B, Zarma IH, Gaji MM (2012) Electricity generation and the present challenges in the Nigerian power sector. J Energy Power Eng 6(7):1050–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K, Organo C, Somerville S, Hanley O, McMahon C (2012) Comparison of atmospheric dispersion model outputs and radioactivity measurements made in Ireland following the Fukushima nuclear emergency. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association Glasgow, 14–18 May 2012

  • Torrud J, Saetre P (2013) Assessment of long-term radiological effects on plants and animal from deep geological respiratory: no discernible impact detected. Ambio 42:506–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuner DB, Richard CCM, Schulze H, QEP PE (2007) In: Practical guide to atmospheric dispersion modelling. Trinity Consultant, Texas

  • Vujić J, Antić DP, Vukmirović Z (2012) Environmental impact and cost analysis of coal versus nuclear power: the US case. Energy 45(1):31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WNA (2011) Comparison of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various electricity generation sources. World Nuclear Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao R (2011) Atmospheric dispersion of radioactive materials in radiological risk assessment and emergency response. Prog Nucl Sci Technol 1:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • yLeóns SB (2011) Panel on safety, health and the environment: implications of nuclear power growth. Health Phys 100:12–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn H, Lim BI, Lee EY, Choi Y (2011) The impact of the risk environment and energy prices to the budget of Korean households. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(3):323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our sincere appreciation goes to the Malaysian Ministry of Higher education and the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for providing a research grant (Q.J130000.2526.03H67) from which part of this work was supported. My sincere appreciation goes to my wife, Nazifa Haruna Muhammad and my children Rah’mah and Ghazwan for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abubakar Sadiq Aliyu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aliyu, A.S., Ramli, A.T. & Saleh, M.A. Environmental impact assessment of a new nuclear power plant (NPP) based on atmospheric dispersion modeling. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28, 1897–1911 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0856-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0856-9

Keywords

Navigation